Search

The Revised upper limb module (RULM) has been increasingly used in clinical trials and in clinical settings. The aim of this study was to use the 'shift analysis' to assess the patterns of lost or gained abilities for each item on the RULM in an untreated cohort, stratified by SMA type, age, SMN2 copy number, and motor functional status. The analysis was performed on 222 12-month paired assessments from 129 individuals (115 assessment from type II and 107 from type III) who had at least two assessments at yearly intervals. There was a loss of one or more activities in 54% in type II and in 29% type III. A gain of one or more activities was found in 42% type II and in 22% type III. There were concomitant gains and losses in 27% in SMA II and in 9% in SMA III. Our results, measuring the number of abilities that are lost or gained, provide an additional method of detecting changes that can be used for the interpretation of the longitudinal data collected in treated SMA individuals., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Giorgia Coratti reports personal fees from BIOGEN S.R.L. ITALIA, ROCHE, GENESIS PHARMA, NOVARTIS, Biologix, outside the submitted work. Dr Coratti is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Roberto de Sanctis reports personal fees from BIOGEN S.R.L. ITALIA, ROCHE and NOVARTIS outside the submitted work. Dr De Sanctis is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Maria C Pera reports personal fees from ROCHE outside the submitted work. Dr Pera is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Jacqueline Montes reports personal fees from BIOGEN S.R.L. and ROCHE, outside the submitted work. Dr Montes is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Amy Pasternak reports grants from SMA FOUNDATION, during the conduct of the study. Dr Pasternak is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Allan M Glanzman received travel/lodging and compensation from Biogen to serve on an advisory board, received licensing fees from Children's Hospital of Philadelphia for the CHOP-INTEND motor scale, institutional support from NOVARTIS, Biogen and Roche for trial training and/or outcome measure review, and personal compensation from ATOM International (Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Catabasis Pharmaceuticals, ReveraGen Biopharma) for trial training; Aspa Theraputics for outcomes consulting; and Audentes Therapeutics for outcome review. Dr Glanman is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Sally Dunaway Young reports grants from Stanford Univesity and Columbia University, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Biogen, Roche/Genentech, Scholar Rock, Cure SMA, grants from SMA Foundation, outside the submitted work. Dr Dunaway Young is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Marika Pane reports personal fees from BIOGEN S.R.L., PTC, NOVARTIS, SAREPTA, outside the submitted work. Dr Pane is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Mariacristina Scoto was CO-PI for SMA REACH UK, during the conduct of the study; received personal fees from ROCHE as PI (jewelfish) and member of advisory board, outside the submitted work. Dr Scoto is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Sonia Messina reports personal fees from BIOGEN S.R.L., NOVARTIS, PTC THERAPEUTICS, SANTHERA, outside the submitted work. Dr Messina is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Adele D'Amico reports personal fees from BIOGEN S.R.L., SAREPTA, NOVARTIS, outside the submitted work. Dr D'Amico is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Emilio Albamonte reports personal fees from BIOGEN S.R.L. outside the submitted work. Dr Albamonte is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Francesca Bovis reports personal fees from BIOGEN outside the submitted work. Basil T Darras reports personal fees from Biogen, NOVARTIS, Roche, Pfizer, Sarepta, PTC, outside the submitted work. Dr Darras is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Enrico Bertini reports personal fees from BIOGEN S.R.L., NOVARTIS, ROCHE, outside the submitted work. Dr Bertini is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Dr Bertini was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health with Current Research funds, Ministry of Health and by Ricerca Finalizzata RF-2019-12370334. Valeria A Sansone reports personal fees from BIOGEN S.R.L, NOVARTIS, SANTHERA, SAREPTA, PTC, outside the submitted work. Dr Sansone is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); John Day reports personal fees from NOVARTIS, ROCHE, BIOGEN S.R.L., Novartis, outside the submitted work. Dr Day is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Francesco Muntoni reports grants from Biogen, grants from Biogen, personal fees from Biogen, grants from NOVARTIS, personal fees from NOVARTIS, personal fees from Roche, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Pfizer, grants from Sarepta, personal fees from Sarepta, personal fees from PTC, outside the submitted work. Dr Muntoni is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Dr Muntoni institutions receive registry funding (SMA REACH UK) from Biogen, Roche and Novartis; he also declares compensation for educational activities and advisory boards with Roche and Novartis; Darryl C. De Vivo reports personal fees from NOVARTIS, ROCHE, BIOGEN S.R.L., Cytokinetics Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. Dr De Vivo is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Giovanni Baranello reports personal fees from NOVARTIS, ROCHE, BIOGEN S.R.L., Novartis, outside the submitted work. Dr Baranello is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Richard Finkel reports personal fees from NOVARTIS, ROCHE, BIOGEN S.R.L., Novartis, outside the submitted work. Dr Finkel is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Eugenio Mercuri reports personal fees from NOVARTIS, ROCHE, BIOGEN S.R.L., PTC THERAPEUTICS, SAREPTA, SANTHERA, SCHOLAR ROCK, outside the submitted work. Dr Mercuri is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Annemarie Rohwer, Irene Mizzoni, Simone Morando, Evelin Milev, Michela Catteruccia, Noemi Brolatti, Francesca Salmin, Matthew Civitello, Maria Sframeli, Zarazuela Zolkipli-Cunningham, Michio Hirano, Tina Duong, are affiliated with an institution that receives funding from BIOGEN, ROCHE and NOVARTIS for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR),, (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: We describe outcomes following onasemnogene abeparvovec monotherapy for patients with ≥four survival motor neuron 2 (SMN2) gene copies in RESTORE, a noninterventional spinal muscular atrophy patient registry., Methods: We evaluated baseline characteristics, motor milestone achievement, post-treatment motor function, use of ventilatory/nutritional support, and adverse events as of December 22, 2022., Results: At data cutoff, 19 patients in RESTORE had ≥four SMN2 copies and were treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec monotherapy (n=12 [63.2%] four copies; n=7 [36.8%] >four copies). All patients were identified by newborn screening and were reported as asymptomatic at diagnosis. Median age at onasemnogene abeparvovec administration was 3.0 months. Median time from treatment to last recorded visit was 15.4 months, with a range of post-treatment follow-up of 0.03-39.4 months. All 12 children who were assessed for motor development achieved new milestones, including standing alone (n=2) and walking alone (n=5). Five children reported one or more treatment-emergent adverse events (one Grade 3 or greater). No deaths or use of ventilatory/nutritional support were reported., Conclusions: Real-world findings from the RESTORE registry indicate that patients with ≥four SMN2 gene copies treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec monotherapy demonstrated improvements in motor function. Adverse events experienced by these patients were consistent with previously reported findings., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest EFT received personal compensation for consultancy from Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Biogen, Biologiz, Cytokinetics, Novartis, and Roche, and research funding from Biogen/Ionis and Roche. SQ-R has participated in clinical trials sponsored by Roche, Novartis and Biogen, and has received speaker and/or consulting fees from Biogen, Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc. (AveXis), Sanofi, UCB, and Roche. She has received research support from the European Commission, INSERM-Health Ministry, and the Association Française des Myopathies (AFM). She is the scientific coordinator of the Registre SMA FRANCE for the French neuromuscular network (FILNEMUS) (http://filnemus.fr) and coordinator of the Garches-Necker-Creteil Health Care Provider for the European Reference Network for Rare Neuromuscular Diseases (ERN EURO-NMD). LS has received personal compensation from Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Biogen, Inc., Cytokinetics, Scholar Rock, Biohaven, Akros Pharma, Roche, and Illumina, and research funding from Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Biogen, Dynacure, and Roche. JAP has received clinical trial funding from AveXis/Novartis, Biogen, PTC Therapeutics, Sarepta Therapeutics, Biohaven, Genentech, and Scholar Rock, and served as advisor/consultant for AveXis, Biogen, Genentech, and Scholar Rock. SA is a site principal investigator for clinical trials of Biogen, Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., and Roche; has participated on advisory boards for Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc./Novartis, and Roche; received speaker's fees from Biogen, Novartis, and Roche; and received a research grant from Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc. AL has served on advisory boards for AveXis and Biogen and received research funding from Novartis and Genentech. RSF has received personal compensation for advisory board/data safety monitoring board participation from Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Biogen, Catabasis, Ionis, ReveraGen, Roche/Genentech, and Scholar Rock; editorial fees from Elsevier for co-editing a neurology textbook; license fees from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; and research funding from Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Biogen, Catabasis, ReveraGen, Roche/Genentech, and Scholar Rock., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Dominant missense mutations of the calcium-permeable cation channel TRPV4 cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) type 2C and two forms of distal spinal muscular atrophy. These conditions are collectively referred to as TRPV4-related neuromuscular disease and share features of motor greater than sensory dysfunction and frequent vocal fold weakness. Pathogenic variants lead to gain of ion channel function that can be rescued by TRPV4 antagonists in cellular and animal models. As small molecule TRPV4 antagonists have proven safe in trials for other disease indications, channel inhibition is a promising therapeutic strategy for TRPV4 patients. However, the current knowledge of the clinical features and natural history of TRPV4-related neuromuscular disease is insufficient to enable rational clinical trial design. To address these issues, we developed a TRPV4 patient database and administered a TRPV4-specific patient questionnaire. Here, we report demographic and clinical information, including CMT examination scores (CMTES), from 68 patients with known pathogenic TRPV4 variants, 40 of whom also completed the TRPV4 patient questionnaire. TRPV4 patients showed a bimodal age of onset, with the largest peak occurring in the first 2 years of life. Compared to CMT1A patients, TRPV4 patients showed distinct symptoms and signs, manifesting more ambulatory difficulties and more frequent involvement of proximal arm and leg muscles. Although patients reported fewer sensory symptoms, sensory dysfunction was often detected clinically. Many patients were affected by vocal fold weakness (55%) and shortness of breath (55%), and 11% required ventilatory support. Skeletal abnormalities were common, including scoliosis (64%), arthrogryposis (33%), and foot deformities. Strikingly, patients with infantile onset of disease showed less sensory involvement and less progression of symptoms. These results highlight distinctive clinical features in TRPV4 patients, including motor-predominant disease, proximal arm and leg weakness, severe ambulatory difficulties, vocal fold weakness, respiratory dysfunction, and skeletal involvement. In addition, patients with infantile onset of disease appeared to have a distinct phenotype with less apparent disease progression based on CMTES. These collective observations indicate that clinical trial design for TRPV4-related neuromuscular disease should include outcome measures that reliably capture non-length dependent motor dysfunction, vocal fold weakness, and respiratory disease., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Objectives: Nusinersen has shown significant functional motor benefit in the milder types of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Less is known on the respiratory outcomes in patients with nusinersen-treated SMA. The aim of this study was to describe changes in respiratory function in pediatric patients with SMA type 2 and 3 on regular treatment with nusinersen within the iSMAc international cohort and to compare their trajectory with the natural history (NH) data published by the consortium in 2020., Methods: This is a 5-year retrospective observational study of pediatric SMA type 2 and nonambulant type 3 (age ≤18 years) treated with nusinersen. The primary objective was to compare the slopes of decline in forced vital capacity % predicted (FVC% pred.), FVC, and age when FVC dropped below 60% between the treated patients and a control group from the natural history cohort. Data on peak cough flow and the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and cough assist were collected., Results: Data were available for 69 treated patients, 53 were SMA type 2 and 16 type 3. The mean (SD) age at first injection was 8.5 (3.2) and 9.7 (3.7) years, respectively. The median (interquartile range) treatment duration was 1 (0.7; 1.9) and 1.2 (0.9; 1.9) years, respectively. At the time of the first nusinersen injection, 24 of 52 (46%) patients with SMA type 2 and 2 of 16 (13%) patients with SMA type 3 were on NIV. Forty-three of 53 (81%) and 4 of 16 (25%) patients used cough device. FVC% pred. in treated patients with SMA type 2 declined annually by 2.3% vs 3.9% in NH ( p = 0.08) and in treated patients with type 3 by 2.6% vs 3.4% NH ( p = 0.59). Patients treated reached FVC <60% later than untreated (12.1 vs 10 years, p = 0.05). A higher percentage of treated vs untreated patients maintained FVC% pred. equal/above their baseline after 12 (65% vs 36%) and 24 (50% vs 24%) months, respectively. NIV use among treated did not significantly change throughout 1-year follow-up., Discussion: This study included the largest real-world cohort of pediatric patients with milder SMA types. The results suggest a positive role of nusinersen in delaying the respiratory decline in patients treated longer than 1 year when compared with natural history. Larger cohorts and longer observation are planned., Classification of Evidence: This study provided Class III evidence that nusinersen slows progression for patients with SMA types 2 and 3 compared with a natural history cohort., Competing Interests: F. Trucco reports participation to Scientific Advisory Boards for Roche UK and teaching initiatives for Biogen, Avexis, Roche, and BREAS. D. Ridout, I. Hughes, Z. Zolkipli-Cunningham, and M. Main report no disclosures. M. Scoto reports participation in Scientific Advisory Boards and teaching initiatives for Avexis, Biogen, and Roche. She is involved as an investigator in clinical trials from Avexis, Biogen, and Roche. In addition, she is the co-principal investigator of the SMA REACH UK clinical network, partially funded by Biogen and Roche. F. Muntoni reports participation in Scientific Advisory Boards and teaching initiatives for Biogen, Roche, and Novartis. He is member of the Rare Disease Scientific Advisory Board for Pfizer. He is involved as an investigator in clinical trials from Novartis, Biogen, and Roche. In addition, he is the principal investigator of the SMA REACH UK clinical network, partially funded by Biogen and Roche. E. Mercuri reports participation in Scientific Advisory Boards and teaching initiatives for Biogen, Roche, Scholar Rock, and Novartis. He is involved as an investigator in clinical trials from Novartis, Biogen, Scholar Rock, and Roche. In addition, he is the principal investigator of the Italian registry participating in iSMAc, partially funded by Biogen, Roche, and Novartis. R. Finkel reports participation in Medical and Scientific Advisory Boards on SMA topics with Novartis, Biogen, Ionis, Roche, Cure SMA, SMA Europe, SMA REACH UK, SMA Foundation, and MDA. Finkel participates as an investigator in SMA-related clinical trials sponsored or supported by Novartis, Biogen, Ionis, Roche, and Scholar Rock. Dr. D. De Vivo reports participation as a consultant in Medical and Scientific Advisory Boards and as an investigator with Novartis, Biogen, Ionis, Roche, PTC, Santhera, Scholar Rock, Sanofi, GliaPharm, Fulcrum Therapeutics, Sarepta, NS Pharma, SMA Foundation, Cure SMA, DoD, NIH, Glut1 Deficiency Foundation, and Hope for Children Research Foundation. B. Darras has served as an ad hoc Scientific Advisory Board member for Novartis, Biogen, Cytokinetics, Vertex, Genentech, Roche, and Sarepta; Steering Committee chair for Roche; and Data Safety Monitoring Board member for Amicus Inc. He has no financial interests in these companies. He has received research support from the NIH/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the Slaney Family Fund for SMA, the Spinal Muscular Atrophy Foundation, CureSMA, and Working on Walking Fund and has received grants from Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, for the ENDEAR, CHERISH, CS2/CS12 studies; from Biogen for CS11; and from Cytokinetics, Sarepta Pharmaceuticals, PTC Therapeutics, Fibrogen, and Summit. O. Mayer reports participation in Advisory Boards for Roche, Biogen, and PTC Therapeutics. He is participating in SMA REACH and iSMAC, partially funded by Biogen. C. Bruno reports participation in Scientific Advisory Boards on SMA topics with Novartis, Biogen, and Roche and participates as a principal investigator in SMA-related clinical trials sponsored by Novartis, Biogen, Ionis, and Roche. S. Messina reports participation in Scientific Advisory Boards and teaching initiatives for Novartis, Biogen, and Roche. She is involved as an investigator in clinical trials from Novartis, Biogen, Scholar Rock, and Roche. M. Pane reports participation in Scientific Advisory Boards and teaching initiatives for Novartis and Biogen. V.A. Sansone provides intellectual support in Advisory Boards and teaching activities for Biogen, Santhera, Sarepta, PTC, Dyne, Triplet, and Novartis. A. D'Amico reports participation in Scientific Advisory Board for Novartis, Roche, and Novartis and teaching initiatives for Biogen. She is also involved as an investigator in clinical trials from Novartis, Biogen, and Roche. In addition, she is an investigator of the Italian registry participating in iSMAc, partially funded by Biogen. E.S. Bertini reports participation in Scientific Advisory Boards for Novartis, Roche, Novartis, and PTC and teaching initiatives for Biogen. He is also involved as an investigator in clinical trials from Novartis, Biogen, Roche, and Novartis. In addition, he is an investigator of the Italian registry participating in iSMAc, partially funded by Biogen. C. Marini-Bettolo reports participation in Scientific Advisory Boards and teaching initiatives for Novartis, Biogen, and Roche. She is involved as an investigator in clinical trials from Novartis. In addition, she is principal investigator for the UK SMA patient registry funded by SMA UK. A. Childs reports participation in Advisory Boards for Novartis, Roche, Biogen, Santhera, and PTC Therapeutics. She is principal investigator for clinical trials supported by Sarepta, Santhera, and PTC Therapeutics. She is participating in SMA REACH and iSMAC, partially funded by Biogen. M. Ong reports participation in Advisory Boards or received consultation fees for Novartis, Roche, Biogen, and CSL Behring. She is participating in SMA REACH and iSMAC, partially funded by Biogen. Dr. A. Mayhew reports participation in Scientific Advisory Boards and teaching initiatives for Biogen and Roche. She is involved as an evaluator at site and acts as an independent consultant to train evaluators in clinical trials from Novartis, Biogen, and Roche. In addition, she is the principal investigator at Newcastle for the SMA REACH UK clinical network, partially funded by Biogen and by SMA UK. J. Montes reports participation as a consultant and on Scientific Advisory Boards for Biogen, Ionis, Roche, and Scholar Rock. G. Coratti reports consultant activities for Novartis, Biogen, Roche, Biologix, and Genesis Pharma. She is involved as a clinical evaluator in clinical trials from Novartis, Biogen, Scholar Rock, and Roche. R. De Sanctis reports consultant activities for Biogen and Roche. He is involved as a clinical evaluator in clinical trials from Novartis, Biogen, Scholar Rock, and Roche. L. Servais reports consultancy/board attendance/lectures for Novartis, Biogen, Roche, Scholar Rock, and BioHaven. A. Majumdar reports participation in Advisory Boards for Novartis, Roche, Biogen, Santhera, and PTC Therapeutics. He is principal investigator for clinical trials supported by Wave Therapeutics. He is participating in SMA REACH and iSMAC, partially funded by Biogen. D. Parasuraman reports participation in Advisory Boards for Roche, Biogen, Sarepta and has had support from PTC Therapeutics. He is principal investigator for clinical trials supported by Roche. He is participating in SMA REACH and iSMAC, partially funded by Biogen. V. Gowda reports participation in Advisory Boards or received consultation fees for Novartis, Roche, Biogen, PTC therapeutics, Wave Life Sciences, Pfizer, and Sarepta Therapeutics. She is participating in SMA REACH and iSMAC, partially funded by Biogen. FT, CB, EB, AD, EM, and MP are members of the ERN NMD (European Reference Networks). Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp., (© 2024 American Academy of Neurology.)

Introduction/aims: NURTURE (NCT02386553) is an open-label study of nusinersen in children (two SMN2 copies, n = 15; three SMN2 copies, n = 10) who initiated treatment in the presymptomatic stage of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). A prior analysis after ~3 y showed benefits on survival, respiratory outcomes, motor milestone achievement, and a favorable safety profile. An additional 2 y of follow-up (data cut: February 15, 2021) are reported., Methods: The primary endpoint is time to death or respiratory intervention (≥6 h/day continuously for ≥7 days or tracheostomy). Secondary outcomes include overall survival, motor function, and safety., Results: Median age of children was 4.9 (3.8-5.5) y at last visit. No children have discontinued the study or treatment. All were alive. No additional children utilized respiratory intervention (defined per primary endpoint) since the prior data cut. Children with three SMN2 copies achieved all World Health Organization (WHO) motor milestones, with all but one milestone in one child within normal developmental timeframes. All 15 children with two SMN2 copies achieved sitting without support, 14/15 walking with assistance, and 13/15 walking alone. Mean Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded total scores showed continued improvement. Subgroups with two SMN2 copies, minimum baseline compound muscle action potential amplitude ≥2 mV, and no baseline areflexia had better motor and nonmotor outcomes versus all children with two SMN2 copies., Discussion: These results demonstrate the value of early treatment, durability of treatment effect, and favorable safety profile after ~5 y of nusinersen treatment. Inclusion/exclusion criteria and baseline characteristics should be considered when interpreting presymptomatic SMA trial data., (© 2023 The Authors. Muscle & Nerve published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The natural history of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is well understood, with progressive muscle weakness resulting in declines in function. The development of contractures is common and negatively impacts function. Clinically, joint hypermobility (JH) is observed but is poorly described, and its relationship with function is unknown. Methods : Lower-limb ROM (range of motion) assessments of extension and flexion at the hip, knee, and ankle were performed. ROMs exceeding the published norms were included in the analysis. The functional assessments performed included the six-minute walk test (6 MWT) and the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded (HFMSE). Results: Of the 143 participants, 86% ( n = 123) had at least one ROM measure that was hypermobile, and 22% ( n = 32) had three or more. The HFMSE scores were inversely correlated with hip extension JH (r = -0.60, p = 0.21; n = 6) and positively correlated with knee flexion JH (r = 0.24, p = 0.02, n = 89). There was a moderate, inverse relationship between the 6 MWT distance and ankle plantar flexion JH (r = -0.73, p = 0.002; n = 15). Conclusions: JH was identified in nearly all participants in at least one joint in this study. Hip extension, knee flexion and ankle plantar flexion JH was associated with function. A further understanding of the trajectory of lower-limb joint ROM is needed to improve future rehabilitation strategies.

Background and Objectives: Vamorolone is a dissociative agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor that has shown similar efficacy and reduced safety concerns in comparison with prednisone in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). This study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of vamorolone over 48 weeks and to study crossover participants (prednisone to vamorolone; placebo to vamorolone)., Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and prednisone-controlled clinical trial of 2 doses of vamorolone was conducted in participants with DMD, in the ages from 4 years to younger than 7 years at baseline. The interventions were 2 mg/kg/d of vamorolone and 6 mg/kg/d of vamorolone for 48 weeks (period 1: 24 weeks + period 2: 24 weeks) and 0.75 mg/kg/d of prednisone and placebo for the first 24 weeks (before crossover). Efficacy was evaluated through gross motor outcomes and safety through adverse events, growth velocity, body mass index (BMI), and bone turnover biomarkers. This analysis focused on period 2., Results: A total of 121 participants with DMD were randomized. Vamorolone at a dose of 6 mg/kg/d showed maintenance of improvement for all motor outcomes to week 48 (e.g., for primary outcome, time to stand from supine [TTSTAND] velocity, week 24 least squares mean [LSM] [SE] 0.052 [0.0130] rises/s vs week 48 LSM [SE] 0.0446 [0.0138]). After 48 weeks, vamorolone at a dose of 2 mg/kg/d showed similar improvements as 6 mg/kg/d for North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) (vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d-vamorolone 2 mg/kg/d LSM [SE] 0.49 [1.14]; 95% CI -1.80 to 2.78, p = 0.67), but less improvement for other motor outcomes. The placebo to vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d group showed rapid improvements after 20 weeks of treatment approaching benefit seen with 48-week 6 mg/kg/d of vamorolone treatment for TTSTAND, time to run/walk 10 m, and NSAA. There was significant improvement in linear growth after crossover in the prednisone to vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d group, and rapid reversal of prednisone-induced decline in bone turnover biomarkers in both crossover groups. There was an increase in BMI after 24 weeks of treatment that then stabilized for both vamorolone groups., Discussion: Improvements of motor outcomes seen with 6 mg/kg/d of vamorolone at 24 weeks of treatment were maintained to 48 weeks of treatment. Vamorolone at a dose of 6 mg/kg/d showed better maintenance of effect compared with vamorolone at a dose of 2 mg/kg/d for most (3/5) motor outcomes. Bone morbidities of prednisone (stunting of growth and declines in serum bone biomarkers) were reversed when treatment transitioned to vamorolone., Trial Registration Information: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03439670., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that for boys with DMD, the efficacy of vamorolone at a dose of 6 mg/kg/d was maintained over 48 weeks.

Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disorder characterised by progressive motor function decline. Motor function is assessed using several functional outcome measures including the Revised Hammersmith Scale (RHS)., Objective: In this study, we present longitudinal trajectories for the RHS in an international cohort of 149 untreated paediatric SMA 2 and 3 patients (across 531 assessments collected between March 2015 and July 2019)., Methods: We contextualise these trajectories using both the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) and Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM). At baseline, this cohort included 50% females and 15% of patients had undergone spinal fusion surgery. Patient trajectories were modelled using a natural cubic spline with age, sex, and random effects for each patient., Results: RHS and HFMSE scores show similar trends over time in this cohort not receiving disease modifying therapies. The results confirm the strong correlation between the RHS and RULM previously observed in SMA types 2 and 3a. Scoliosis surgery is associated with a reduction of 3 points in the RHS, 4.5 points in the HFMSE for the SMA 2 population, and a reduction of 11.8 points in the RHS, and 13.4 points in the HFMSE for the SMA 3a populations. When comparing the RHS and RULM, there is a lower correlation in the type 3a's than the type 2 patients. In the SMA 2 population, there is no significant difference between the sexes in either the RHS or HFMSE trajectories. There is no significant difference in the RULM trajectory in the SMA 2 or 3a participants by sex., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the RHS could be used in conjunction with other functional measures such as the RULM to holistically detect SMA disease progression. This will assist with fully understanding changes that occur with treatments, further defining trajectories and therapy outcomes.

Background: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and related dystrophinopathies are neuromuscular conditions with great unmet medical needs that require the development of effective medical treatments., Objective: To aid sponsors in clinical development of drugs and therapeutic biological products for treating DMD across the disease spectrum by integrating advancements, patient registries, natural history studies, and more into a comprehensive guidance., Methods: This guidance emerged from collaboration between the FDA, the Duchenne community, and industry stakeholders. It entailed a structured approach, involving multiple committees and boards. From its inception in 2014, the guidance underwent revisions incorporating insights from gene therapy studies, cardiac function research, and innovative clinical trial designs., Results: The guidance provides a deeper understanding of DMD and its variants, focusing on patient engagement, diagnostic criteria, natural history, biomarkers, and clinical trials. It underscores patient-focused drug development, the significance of dystrophin as a biomarker, and the pivotal role of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing disease progression. Additionally, the guidance addresses cardiomyopathy's prominence in DMD and the burgeoning field of gene therapy., Conclusions: The updated guidance offers a comprehensive understanding of DMD, emphasizing patient-centric approaches, innovative trial designs, and the importance of biomarkers. The focus on cardiomyopathy and gene therapy signifies the evolving realm of DMD research. It acts as a crucial roadmap for sponsors, potentially leading to improved treatments for DMD.

Background: The CHOP-INTEND is an established outcome measure used to assess motor function in young and weak SMA patients previously validated in type I infants older than 3 months., Objective: The aim of our study was to assess the maturation of the CHOP-INTEND scores in a group of healthy infants, establishing which items of the scale can be reliably used in individuals younger than 3 months., Methods: This is a prospective observational study. The whole cohort was divided into 5 age groups. Each of the 16 CHOP-INTEND items was analyzed looking at the frequency distribution of the scores in each age subgroup. An item was considered developmentally appropriate when > 85% of the infants achieved a full score., Results: our study includes 61 assessments collected < 2 weeks, 25 at 2-4 weeks, 20 at 5-8 weeks, 25 at 9-12 weeks and 20 at 13-17 weeks. Eight of the 16 items were developmentally appropriate already in the first week and another by the end of the first month. The remaining 7 items had more variable responses in the first three months and full scores were consistently achieved only after the third month., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the CHOP-INTEND can be used before the age of 3 months, but the results should be interpreted with caution, considering which items are developmentally appropriate at the time of testing. This will also help to establish whether the changes observed following early treatments are a sign of efficacy or at least partly reflect maturational aspects.

Background: Long-term, real-world effectiveness and safety data of disease-modifying treatments for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) are important for assessing outcomes and providing information for a larger number and broader range of SMA patients than included in clinical trials., Objective: We sought to describe patients with SMA treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec monotherapy in the real-world setting., Methods: RESTORE is a prospective, multicenter, multinational, observational registry that captures data from a variety of sources., Results: Recruitment started in September 2018. As of May 23, 2022, data were available for 168 patients treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec monotherapy. Median (IQR) age at initial SMA diagnosis was 1 (0-6) month and at onasemnogene abeparvovec infusion was 3 (1-10) months. Eighty patients (47.6%) had two and 70 (41.7%) had three copies of SMN2, and 98 (58.3%) were identified by newborn screening. Infants identified by newborn screening had a lower age at final assessment (mean age 11.5 months) and greater mean final (SD) CHOP INTEND score (57.0 [10.0] points) compared with clinically diagnosed patients (23.1 months; 52.1 [8.0] points). All patients maintained/achieved motor milestones. 48.5% (n = 81/167) experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (AE), and 31/167 patients (18.6%) experienced at least one serious AE, of which 8/31 were considered treatment-related., Conclusion: These real-world outcomes support findings from the interventional trial program and demonstrate effectiveness of onasemnogene abeparvovec over a large patient population, which was consistent with initial clinical data and published 5-year follow-up data. Observed AEs were consistent with the established safety profile of onasemnogene abeparvovec.

We sought to devise a rational, systematic approach for defining/grouping survival motor neuron-targeted disease-modifying treatment (DMT) scenarios. The proposed classification is primarily based on a two-part differentiation: initial DMT, and persistence/discontinuation of subsequent DMT(s). Treatment categories were identified: monotherapy add-on, transient add-on, combination with onasemnogene abeparvovec, bridging to onasemnogene abeparvovec, and switching to onasemnogene abeparvovec. We validated this approach by applying the classification to the 443 patients currently in the RESTORE registry and explored the demographics of these different groups of patients. This work forms the basis to explore the safety and efficacy profile of the different combinations of DMT in SMA., (© 2023 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) due to GJB1 variants (CMTX1) is the second most common form of CMT. It is an X-linked disorder characterized by progressive sensory and motor neuropathy with males affected more severely than females. Many reported GJB1 variants remain classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). In this large, international, multicentre study we prospectively collected demographic, clinical and genetic data on patients with CMT associated with GJB1 variants. Pathogenicity for each variant was defined using adapted American College of Medical Genetics criteria. Baseline and longitudinal analyses were conducted to study genotype-phenotype correlations, to calculate longitudinal change using the CMT Examination Score (CMTES), to compare males versus females, and pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants versus VUS. We present 387 patients from 295 families harbouring 154 variants in GJB1. Of these, 319 patients (82.4%) were deemed to have P/LP variants, 65 had VUS (16.8%) and three benign variants (0.8%; excluded from analysis); an increased proportion of patients with P/LP variants compared with using ClinVar's classification (74.6%). Male patients (166/319, 52.0%, P/LP only) were more severely affected at baseline. Baseline measures in patients with P/LP variants and VUS showed no significant differences, and regression analysis suggested the disease groups were near identical at baseline. Genotype-phenotype analysis suggested c.-17G>A produces the most severe phenotype of the five most common variants, and missense variants in the intracellular domain are less severe than other domains. Progression of disease was seen with increasing CMTES over time up to 8 years follow-up. Standard response mean (SRM), a measure of outcome responsiveness, peaked at 3 years with moderate responsiveness [change in CMTES (ΔCMTES) = 1.3 ± 2.6, P = 0.00016, SRM = 0.50]. Males and females progressed similarly up to 8 years, but baseline regression analysis suggested that over a longer period, females progress more slowly. Progression was most pronounced for mild phenotypes (CMTES = 0-7; 3-year ΔCMTES = 2.3 ± 2.5, P = 0.001, SRM = 0.90). Enhanced variant interpretation has yielded an increased proportion of GJB1 variants classified as P/LP and will aid future variant interpretation in this gene. Baseline and longitudinal analysis of this large cohort of CMTX1 patients describes the natural history of the disease including the rate of progression; CMTES showed moderate responsiveness for the whole group at 3 years and higher responsiveness for the mild group at 3, 4 and 5 years. These results have implications for patient selection for upcoming clinical trials., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

Recessive SH3TC2 variants cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4C (CMT4C). CMT4C is typically a sensorimotor demyelinating polyneuropathy, marked by early onset spinal deformities, but its clinical characteristics and severity are quite variable. Clear relationships between pathogenic variants and the spectrum of disease manifestations are to date lacking. Gene replacement therapy has been shown to ameliorate the phenotype in a mouse model of CMT4C, emphasizing the need for natural history studies to inform clinical trial readiness. Data, including both genetic information and clinical characteristics, were compiled from the longitudinal, prospective dataset of the Inherited Neuropathy Consortium, a member of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (INC-RDCRN). The Charcot Marie Tooth Neuropathy Score (CMTNS), Examination Score (CMTES) and the Rasch-weighted CMTES (CMTES-R) were used to describe symptoms, neurological examinations and neurophysiological characteristics. Standardized response means were calculated at yearly intervals and a mixed model for repeated measures was used to estimate the change in CMTES and CMTES-R over time. Fifty-six individuals (59% female), median age 27 years (range 2-67 years) with homozygous or compound heterozygous variants in SH3TC2 were identified, including 34 unique variants, 14 of which have not previously been published. Twenty-eight participants had longitudinal data available. While there was no significant difference in the CMTES in those with protein truncating versus non-protein truncating variants, there were significant differences in the mean ulnar nerve compound muscle action potential amplitude, the mean radial sensory nerve action potential amplitude, and in the prevalence of scoliosis, suggesting the possibility of a milder phenotype in individuals with one or two non-protein-truncating variants. Overall, the mean value of the CMTES was 13, reflecting moderate clinical severity. There was a high rate of scoliosis (81%), scoliosis surgery (36%), and walking difficulty (94%) among study participants. The CMTES and CMTES-R appeared moderately responsive to change over extended follow-up, demonstrating a standardized response mean of 0.81 standard deviation units or 0.71 standard deviation units, respectively, over 3 years. Our analysis represents the largest cross-sectional and only longitudinal study to date, of the clinical phenotype of both adults and children with CMT4C. With the promise of upcoming genetic treatments, these data will further define the natural history of the disease and inform study design in preparation for clinical trials., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

What Is Known and Objective: There is limited information on acceptability of solid dosage forms by young patients with neuromuscular disorders such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Capsule size selection and ability to swallow the NF-κB inhibitor edasalonexent were assessed in males 4-7 years of age with DMD enrolled in clinical trials for a new therapeutic., Methods: The Phase 3 PolarisDMD randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 131 patients from 8 countries. The Phase 2 MoveDMD trial enrolled 31 patients in the United States. As part of enrolment criteria, these trials assessed the ability to swallow softgel 100 mg (~10 mm) or 250 mg (~15 mm) capsules formulated with a phosphatidylcholine-containing coating. Supportive strategies included pill-swallowing techniques and aids., Results: Most (97%; 175/181) patients screened were able to swallow capsules. In Phase 2 and 3, respectively, 77% (24/31) and 61% (80/131) of enrolled patients selected the larger capsule and among those selecting the smaller capsule, most transitioned to the larger capsule. There were no obvious geographical differences in ability to swallow capsules and size selection was not correlated with age. Compliance was high (92%-98%) through 52 weeks of dosing with no discontinuations due to capsule burden., What Is New and Conclusion: Swallowing of capsules was not a barrier for drug administration in young patients with DMD. Capsule formulations may be an acceptable alternative to liquid formulations for children as young as 4 years of age., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on disease progression over 2 years in children with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT)., Methods: BMI was classified in 242 participants aged 3-20 years with CMT enrolled in the Inherited Neuropathy Consortium, using the International Obesity Task Force (based on adult BMI values, kg/m 2 ) criteria. Groups were categorized as severely underweight (BMI <17 kg/m 2 ), underweight (BMI ≥17 to <18.5 kg/m 2 ), healthy weight (BMI ≥18.5 to <25 kg/m 2 ), overweight (BMI ≥25 to <30 kg/m 2 ), and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 ). Disease severity was assessed using the CMT Pediatric Scale (CMTPedS), a clinical outcome assessment of disability (0-44 points, mild to severe)., Results: At baseline, compared with individuals being of a healthy weight (mean CMTPedS 15.48, SD 9.22), children who were severely underweight (mean CMTPedS difference 9.03, 95% CI 0.94-17.12; p = 0.02), underweight (mean CMTPedS difference 5.97, 95% CI 0.62-11.31; p = 0.02), or obese (mean CMTPedS difference 7.96, 95% CI 1.03-14.88; p = 0.015) exhibited greater disability. At 2 years, compared with individuals being of a healthy weight (mean CMTPedS 17.53, SD 9.41), children who were severely underweight exhibited greater disability (mean CMTPedS difference 9.27, 95% CI 0.90-17.64; p = 0.02). Over the 2-year periods, the mean CMTPedS for the whole sample deteriorated by 1.72 points (95% CI 1.09-2.38; p < 0.001), with severely underweight children progressing at the fastest rate (mean CMTPedS change of 2.3, 95% CI 1.53-6.13; p = 0.21). In children who did not have a change in BMI categories over 2 years (69% of sample), CMTPedS scores deteriorated faster in those who were severely underweight (mean CMTPedS change 6.40 points, 95% CI 2.42-10.38; p = 0.01) than those of healthy weight (mean CMTPedS change 1.79 points, 95% CI 0.93-2.69; p < 0.001). For children who changed BMI categories (31% of sample), CMTPedS scores deteriorated faster in children who became overweight/obese (mean CMTPedS change 2.76 points, 95% CI 0.11-5.41; p = 0.031)., Discussion: Children with CMT who were severely underweight, underweight, or obese exhibited greater disability at baseline. Over the 2-year period in those whose BMI remained stable, severely underweight children deteriorated at the fastest rate. For children who changed BMI categories over the 2 years, CMTPedS scores deteriorated faster in children who became overweight/obese. Interventions that maintain or improve BMI toward healthy weight may reduce disability in children with CMT., (© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.)

Nusinersen has been shown to improve or stabilize motor function in individuals with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). We evaluated baseline scoliosis severity and motor function in nusinersen-treated non-ambulatory children with later-onset SMA. Post hoc analyses were conducted on 95 children initiating nusinersen treatment in the CHERISH study or SHINE long-term extension trial. Participants were categorized by baseline Cobb angle (first nusinersen dose): ≤10°, >10° to ≤20°, and >20° to <40° (no/mild/moderate scoliosis, respectively). Outcome measures included the Hammersmith Functional Motor Score-Expanded (HFMSE) and the Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM). Regression analysis determined the relationships between baseline scoliosis severity and later motor function. For children with no, mild, and moderate scoliosis, the mean increase in HFMSE from baseline to Day 930 was 6.0, 3.9, and 0.7 points, and in RULM was 6.1, 4.6, and 2.3 points. In the linear model, a 10° increase in baseline Cobb angle was significantly associated with a -1.4 (95% CI -2.6, -0.2) point decrease in HFMSE ( p = 0.02) and a -1.2 (95% CI -2.1, -0.4) point decrease in RULM ( p = 0.006) at Day 930. Treatment with nusinersen was associated with improvements/stabilization in motor function in all groups, with greater response in those with no/mild scoliosis at baseline.

Heritable neurological disorders provide insights into disease mechanisms that permit development of novel therapeutic approaches including antisense oligonucleotides, RNA interference, and gene replacement. Many neurogenetic diseases are rare and slowly progressive making it challenging to measure disease progression within short time frames. We share our experience developing clinical outcome assessments and disease biomarkers in the inherited peripheral neuropathies. We posit that carefully developed biomarkers from imaging, plasma, or skin can predict meaningful progression in functional and patient reported outcome assessments such that clinical trials of less than 2 years will be feasible for these rare and ultra-rare disorders. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:906-910., (© 2023 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Background: Utrophin, a dystrophin homolog, is consistently upregulated in muscles of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and is believed to partially compensate for the lack of dystrophin in dystrophic muscle. Even though several animal studies support the idea that utrophin can modulate DMD disease severity, human clinical data are scarce., Methods: We describe a patient with the largest reported in-frame deletion in the DMD gene, including exons 10-60 and thus encompassing the entire rod domain., Findings: The patient presented with an unusually early and severe progressive weakness, initially suggesting congenital muscular dystrophy. Immunostaining of his muscle biopsy showed that the mutant protein was able to localize at the sarcolemma and stabilize the dystrophin-associated complex. Strikingly, utrophin protein was absent from the sarcolemmal membrane despite the upregulation of utrophin mRNA., Conclusions: Our results suggest that the internally deleted and dysfunctional dystrophin lacking the entire rod domain may exert a dominant-negative effect by preventing upregulated utrophin protein from reaching the sarcolemmal membrane and thus blocking its partial rescue of muscle function. This unique case may set a lower size limit for similar constructs in potential gene therapy approaches., Funding: This work was supported by a grant from MDA USA (MDA3896) and by grant number R01AR051999 from NIAMS/NIH to C.G.B., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences' virtual 2021 conference on gene-targeted therapies (GTTs) encouraged multidisciplinary dialogue on a wide range of GTT topic areas. Each of three parallel working groups included social scientists and clinical scientists, and the three major sessions included a presentation on economic issues related to their focus area. These experts also coordinated their efforts across the three groups. The economics-related presentations covered three areas with some overlap: (1) value assessment, uncertainty, and dynamic efficiency; (2) affordability, pricing, and financing; and (3) evidence generation, coverage, and access. This article provides a synopsis of three presentations, some of their key recommendations, and an update on related developments in the past year. The key high-level findings are that GTTs present unique data and policy challenges, and that existing regulatory, health technology assessment, as well as payment and financing systems will need to adapt. But these adjustments can build on our existing foundation of regulatory and incentive systems for innovation, and much can be done to accelerate progress in GTTs. Given the substantial unmet medical need that exists for these oft-neglected patients suffering from rare diseases, it would be a tragedy to not leverage these exciting scientific advances in GTTs., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Genomic and gene-targeted therapies hold great promise in addressing the global issue of rare diseases. To achieve this promise, however, it is critical the twin goals of equity in access to testing and diagnosis, and equity in access to therapy be considered early in the life cycle of development and implementation. Rare disease researchers and clinicians must simultaneously recognize the life-altering potential of early diagnosis and administration of gene-targeted therapeutics while acknowledging that not everyone who experiences a rare disease and needs these therapies will be able to afford or access them. Achieving equity in the development of and access to gene-targeted therapies will not only require innovations in research, clinical, regulatory, and reimbursement frameworks, but will also necessitate increased attention to the ethical, legal, and social implications when establishing research paradigms and the translation of research results into novel interventions for rare genetic diseases. This article highlights and discusses the growing importance and recognition of health equity across the spectrum of rare disease research and care delivery., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Recent advancements in gene-targeted therapies have highlighted the critical role data sharing plays in successful translational drug development for people with rare diseases. To scale these efforts, we need to systematize these sharing principles, creating opportunities for more rapid, efficient, and scalable drug discovery/testing including long-term and transparent assessment of clinical safety and efficacy. A number of challenges will need to be addressed, including the logistical difficulties of studying rare diseases affecting individuals who may be scattered across the globe, scientific, technical, regulatory, and ethical complexities of data collection, and harmonization and integration across multiple platforms and contexts. The NCATS/NIH Gene-Targeted Therapies: Early Diagnosis and Equitable Delivery meeting series held during June 2021 included data sharing models that address these issues and framed discussions of areas that require improvement. This article describes these discussions and provides a series of considerations for future data sharing., (© 2023 The Authors. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: The paucity of longitudinal natural history studies in MPZ neuropathy remains a barrier to clinical trials. We have completed a longitudinal natural history study in patients with MPZ neuropathies across 13 sites of the Inherited Neuropathies Consortium., Methods: Change in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Examination Score (CMTES) and Rasch modified CMTES (CMTES-R) were evaluated using longitudinal regression over a 5-year period in subjects with MPZ neuropathy. Data from 139 patients with MPZ neuropathy were examined., Results: The average baseline CMTES and CMTES-R were 10.84 (standard deviation [SD] = 6.0, range = 0-28) and 14.60 (SD = 7.56, range = 0-32), respectively. A mixed regression model showed significant change in CMTES at years 2-5 (mean change from baseline of 0.87 points at 2 years, p = 0.008). Subgroup analysis revealed greater change in CMTES at 2 years in subjects with axonal as compared to demyelinating neuropathy (mean change of 1.30 points [p = 0.016] vs 0.06 points [p = 0.889]). Patients with a moderate baseline neuropathy severity also showed more notable change, by estimate, than those with mild or severe neuropathy (mean 2-year change of 1.14 for baseline CMTES 8-14 [p = 0.025] vs -0.03 for baseline CMTES 0-7 [p = 0.958] and 0.25 for baseline CMTES ≥ 15 [p = 0.6897]). The progression in patients harboring specific MPZ mutations was highly variable., Interpretation: CMTES is sensitive to change over time in adult patients with axonal but not demyelinating forms of MPZ neuropathy. Change in CMTES was greatest in patients with moderate baseline disease severity. These findings will inform future clinical trials of MPZ neuropathies. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:563-576., (© 2022 American Neurological Association.)

The Revised Hammersmith Scale (RHS) is a 36-item ordinal scale developed using clinical expertise and sound psychometrics to investigate motor function in participants with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). In this study, we investigate median change in the RHS score up to two years in paediatric SMA 2 and 3 participants and contextualise it to the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded (HFMSE). These change scores were considered by SMA type, motor function, and baseline RHS score. We consider a new transitional group, spanning crawlers, standers, and walkers-with-assistance, and analyse that alongside non-sitters, sitters, and walkers. The transitional group exhibit the most definitive change score trend, with an average 1-year decline of 3 points. In the weakest patients, we are most able to detect positive change in the RHS in the under-5 age group, whereas in the stronger patients, we are most able to detect decline in the RHS in the 8-13 age group. The RHS has a reduced floor effect compared to the HFMSE, although we show that the RHS should be used in conjunction with the RULM for participants scoring less than 20 points on the RHS. The timed items in the RHS have high between-participant variability, so participants with the same RHS total can be differentiated by their timed test items.

Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disorder arising from biallelic non-functional survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) genes with variable copies of partially functional SMN2 gene. Intrathecal onasemnogene abeparvovec administration, at fixed, low doses, may enable treatment of heavier patients ineligible for weight-based intravenous dosing., Objective: STRONG (NCT03381729) assessed the safety/tolerability and efficacy of intrathecal onasemnogene abeparvovec for sitting, nonambulatory SMA patients., Methods: Sitting, nonambulatory SMA patients (biallelic SMN1 loss, three SMN2 copies, aged 6-<60 months) received a single dose of intrathecal onasemnogene abeparvovec. Patients were enrolled sequentially into one of three (low, medium, and high) dose cohorts and stratified into two groups by age at dosing: younger (6-<24 months) and older (24-<60 months). Primary endpoints included safety/tolerability, independent standing ≥3 seconds (younger group), and change in Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) from baseline (older group) compared with historic controls., Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled and completed the study (medium dose, n = 25). All patients had one or more treatment-emergent adverse events, with one serious and related to treatment (transaminase elevations). No deaths were reported. One of 13 patients (7.7%) in the younger group treated with the medium dose achieved independent standing. At Month 12 for the older group receiving the medium dose, change from baseline in HFMSE was significantly improved compared with the SMA historic control population (P < 0.01)., Conclusions: Intrathecal onasemnogene abeparvovec was safe and well-tolerated. Older patients treated with the medium dose demonstrated increases in HFMSE score greater than commonly observed in natural history.

Background: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling indicates that the higher dose of nusinersen may be associated with a clinically meaningful increase in efficacy above that seen with the 12-mg approved dose., Objective: Here we describe both the design of DEVOTE (NCT04089566), a 3-part clinical study evaluating safety, tolerability, and efficacy of higher dose of nusinersen, and results from the initial Part A., Methods: DEVOTE Part A evaluates safety and tolerability of a higher nusinersen dose; Part B assesses efficacy in a randomized, double-blind design; and Part C assesses safety and tolerability of participants transitioning from the 12-mg dose to higher doses., Results: In the completed Part A of DEVOTE, all 6 enrolled participants aged 6.1-12.6 years have completed the study. Four participants experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), the majority of which were mild. Common TEAEs of headache, pain, chills, vomiting, and paresthesia were considered related to the lumbar puncture procedure. There were no safety concerns regarding clinical or laboratory parameters. Nusinersen levels in the cerebrospinal fluid were within the range of modeled predictions for higher dose of nusinersen. While Part A was not designed for assessing efficacy, most participants showed stabilization or improvement in motor function. Parts B and C of DEVOTE are ongoing., Conclusions: The findings from Part A of the DEVOTE study support further development of higher dose of nusinersen.

Importance: Corticosteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely prescribed but long-term use shows adverse effects that detract from patient quality of life., Objective: To determine if vamorolone, a structurally unique dissociative steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, is able to retain efficacy while reducing safety concerns with use in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD)., Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-blind, placebo- and prednisone-controlled 24-week clinical trial, conducted from June 29, 2018, to February 24, 2021, with 24 weeks of follow-up. This was a multicenter study (33 referral centers in 11 countries) and included boys 4 to younger than 7 years of age with genetically confirmed DMD not previously treated with corticosteroids., Interventions: The study included 4 groups: placebo; prednisone, 0.75 mg/kg per day; vamorolone, 2 mg/kg per day; and vamorolone, 6 mg/kg per day., Main Outcomes and Measures: Study outcomes monitored (1) efficacy, which included motor outcomes (primary: time to stand from supine velocity in the vamorolone, 6 mg/kg per day, group vs placebo; secondary: time to stand from supine velocity [vamorolone, 2 mg/kg per day], 6-minute walk distance, time to run/walk 10 m [vamorolone, 2 and 6 mg/kg per day]; exploratory: NorthStar Ambulatory Assessment, time to climb 4 stairs) and (2) safety, which included growth, bone biomarkers, and a corticotropin (ACTH)-challenge test., Results: Among the 133 boys with DMD enrolled in the study (mean [SD] age, 5.4 [0.9] years), 121 were randomly assigned to treatment groups, and 114 completed the 24-week treatment period. The trial met the primary end point for change from baseline to week 24 time to stand velocity for vamorolone, 6 mg/kg per day (least-squares mean [SE] velocity, 0.05 [0.01] m/s vs placebo -0.01 [0.01] m/s; 95% CI, 0.02-0.10; P = .002) and the first 4 sequential secondary end points: time to stand velocity, vamorolone, 2 mg/kg per day, vs placebo; 6-minute walk test, vamorolone, 6 mg/kg per day, vs placebo; 6-minute walk test, vamorolone, 2 mg/kg per day, vs placebo; and time to run/walk 10 m velocity, vamorolone, 6 mg/kg per day, vs placebo. Height percentile declined in prednisone-treated (not vamorolone-treated) participants (change from baseline [SD]: prednisone, -1.88 [8.81] percentile vs vamorolone, 6 mg/kg per day, +3.86 [6.16] percentile; P = .02). Bone turnover markers declined with prednisone but not with vamorolone. Boys with DMD at baseline showed low ACTH-stimulated cortisol and high incidence of adrenal insufficiency. All 3 treatment groups led to increased adrenal insufficiency., Conclusions and Relevance: In this pivotal randomized clinical trial, vamorolone was shown to be effective and safe in the treatment of boys with DMD over a 24-week treatment period. Vamorolone may be a safer alternative than prednisone in this disease, in which long-term corticosteroid use is the standard of care., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03439670.

This phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, hypothesis-generating study evaluated the effects of oral reldesemtiv, a fast skeletal muscle troponin activator, in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Patients ≥ 12 years of age with type II, III, or IV SMA were randomized into 2 sequential, ascending reldesemtiv dosing cohorts (cohort 1: 150 mg bid or placebo [2:1]; cohort 2: 450 mg bid or placebo [2:1]). The primary objective was to determine potential pharmacodynamic effects of reldesemtiv on 8 outcome measures in SMA, including 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP). Changes from baseline to weeks 4 and 8 were determined. Pharmacokinetics and safety were also evaluated. Patients were randomized to reldesemtiv 150 mg, 450 mg, or placebo (24, 20, and 26, respectively). The change from baseline in 6MWD was greater for reldesemtiv 450 mg than for placebo at weeks 4 and 8 (least squares [LS] mean difference, 35.6 m [p = 0.0037] and 24.9 m [p = 0.058], respectively). Changes from baseline in MEP at week 8 on reldesemtiv 150 and 450 mg were significantly greater than those on placebo (LS mean differences, 11.7 [p = 0.038] and 13.2 cm H 2 O [p = 0.03], respectively). For 6MWD and MEP, significant changes from placebo were seen in the highest reldesemtiv peak plasma concentration quartile (C max  > 3.29 μg/mL; LS mean differences, 43.3 m [p = 0.010] and 28.8 cm H 2 O [p = 0.0002], respectively). Both dose levels of reldesemtiv were well tolerated. Results suggest reldesemtiv may offer clinical benefit and support evaluation in larger SMA patient populations., (© 2021. The Author(s).)