1. Determination of causes of post-operative dysphagia after anti-reflux surgery based on intra-operative planimetry.
- Author
-
Al Asadi H, Najah H, Li Y, Marshall T, Salehi N, Turaga A, Finnerty BM, Fahey TJ 3rd, and Zarnegar R
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Aged, Robotic Surgical Procedures adverse effects, Robotic Surgical Procedures methods, Fundoplication adverse effects, Fundoplication methods, Adult, Electric Impedance, Deglutition Disorders etiology, Manometry methods, Postoperative Complications etiology, Postoperative Complications prevention & control, Gastroesophageal Reflux
- Abstract
Introduction: Dysphagia after anti-reflux surgery (ARS) is one of the most common indications for re-operative anti-reflux surgery and a leading cause of patient dissatisfaction. Unfortunately, the factors affecting its development are poorly understood. We investigated the correlation between pre-operative manometric and the intra-operative impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) measurements and development of post-operative dysphagia., Methods: A review of patients who underwent index robotic ARS in our institution. Patients who underwent pre-operative manometry and intra-operative EndoFLIP™ were included in our study. Dysphagia was assessed pre-operatively and at 3-month after surgery., Results: Fifty-five patients (26.9%) reported post-operative dysphagia, and 34 (16.6%) reported new or worsening dysphagia. On pre-operative manometry, patients with post-operative dysphagia had a lower distal contractile integral [868.7 (IQR 402.2-1447) mmHg s cm vs 1207 (IQR 612.1-2111) mmHg s cm, p = 0.006) and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure [14.7 IQR (8.9-23.6) mmHg vs 20.7 IQR (10.2-32.6) mmHg, p = 0.01] compared to those without post-operative dysphagia. They were also found to have higher pre-operative cross-sectional surface area (CSA) [83 IQR (44.5-112) mm
2 vs 66 IQR (42-93) mm2 , p = 0.02], and distensibility index (DI) [4.2 IQR (2.2-5.5) mm2 /mmHg vs 2.9 IQR (1.6-4.6) mm2 /mmHg, p = 0.003] compared to patients without post-operative dysphagia. Additionally, the decrease in CSA [- 34 (- 18.5, - 74.5) mm2 vs - 26.5 (- 10.5, - 53.7) mm2 , p = 0.03] and DI [- 2.3 (- 1.2, - 3.7) mm2 /mmHg vs - 1.6 (- 0.7, - 3.3) mm2 /mmHg, p = 0.03] measurements were greater in patients with post-operative dysphagia., Conclusion: Patients who developed dysphagia post-operatively had poorer pre-operative motility and a greater change in LES characteristics intra-operatively. This finding suggests the utility of pre-operative manometry and intra-operative EndoFLIP in identifying patients at risk of developing dysphagia post-operatively., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF