Search

The transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) drives metabolic reprogramming in gliomas (GLs) under hypoxic conditions, promoting glycolysis for tumor development. Evofosfamide (EVO) releases a DNA-alkylating agent within hypoxic regions, indicating that it may serve as a hypoxia-targeted therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the glycolytic metabolism and antitumor effects of EVO in a canine GL model. Our clinical data showed that overall survival was significantly decreased in GL dog patients with higher HIF-1α expression compared to that of those with lower HIF-1α expression, and there was a positive correlation between HIF-1α and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1) expression, suggesting that glycolytic activity under hypoxia conditions may contribute to poor outcomes in canine GL. Our glycolysis assay tests showed that the glycolytic ATP level was higher than the mitochondrial ATP level in three types of canine GL cell lines by activating the HIF-1 signal pathway under hypoxia conditions, resulting in an overall increase in total cellular ATP production. However, treatment with EVO inhibited the glycolytic ATP level in the GL cell lines under hypoxia conditions by targeting HIF-1α-positive cells, leading to decrease in total cellular ATP production. Our in vivo tests showed that EVO significantly reduced tumor development compared to controls and temozolomide in murine GL models. A metabolic analysis demonstrated that EVO effectively suppressed glycolytic metabolism by eliminating HIF-1α-positive cells, suggesting that it may restore metabolism in canine GLs. The evidence presented here supports the favorable preclinical evaluation of EVO as a potential improvement in cancer metabolism.

The goal of this study is to develop a mathematical model that captures the interaction between evofosfamide, immunotherapy, and the hypoxic landscape of the tumor in the treatment of tumors. Recently, we showed that evofosfamide, a hypoxia-activated prodrug, can synergistically improve treatment outcomes when combined with immunotherapy, while evofosfamide alone showed no effects in an in vivo syngeneic model of colorectal cancer. However, the mechanisms behind the interaction between the tumor microenvironment in the context of oxygenation (hypoxic, normoxic), immunotherapy, and tumor cells are not fully understood. To begin to understand this issue, we develop a system of ordinary differential equations to simulate the growth and decline of tumors and their vascularization (oxygenation) in response to treatment with evofosfamide and immunotherapy (6 combinations of scenarios). The model is calibrated to data from in vivo experiments on mice implanted with colon adenocarcinoma cells and longitudinally imaged with [18F]-fluoromisonidazole ([18F]FMISO) positron emission tomography (PET) to quantify hypoxia. The results show that evofosfamide is able to rescue the immune response and sensitize hypoxic tumors to immunotherapy. In the hypoxic scenario, evofosfamide reduces tumor burden by $ 45.07 \pm 2.55 $%, compared to immunotherapy alone, as measured by tumor volume. The model accurately predicts the temporal evolution of five different treatment scenarios, including control, hypoxic tumors that received immunotherapy, normoxic tumors that received immunotherapy, evofosfamide alone, and hypoxic tumors that received combination immunotherapy and evofosfamide. The average concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between predicted and observed tumor volume is $ 0.86 \pm 0.05 $. Interestingly, the model values to fit those five treatment arms was unable to accurately predict the response of normoxic tumors to combination evofosfamide and immunotherapy (CCC = $ -0.064 \pm 0.003 $). However, guided by the sensitivity analysis to rank the most influential parameters on the tumor volume, we found that increasing the tumor death rate due to immunotherapy by a factor of $ 18.6 \pm 9.3 $ increases CCC of $ 0.981 \pm 0.001 $. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to mathematically predict and describe the increased efficacy of immunotherapy following evofosfamide.

Glioblastomas (GBM) are the most common and aggressive form of primary malignant brain tumor in the adult population, and, despite modern therapies, patients often develop recurrent disease, and the disease remains incurable with median survival below 2 years. Resistance to bevacizumab is driven by hypoxia in the tumor and evofosfamide is a hypoxia-activated prodrug, which we tested in a phase 2, dual center (University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio and Dana Farber Cancer Institute) clinical trial after bevacizumab failure. Tumor hypoxic volume was quantified by 18F-misonidazole PET. To identify circulating metabolic biomarkers of tumor hypoxia in patients, we used a high-resolution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based approach to profile blood metabolites and their specific enantiomeric forms using untargeted approaches. Moreover, to evaluate early response to treatment, we characterized changes in circulating metabolite levels during treatment with combined bevacizumab and evofosfamide in recurrent GBM after bevacizumab failure. Gamma aminobutyric acid, and glutamic acid as well as its enantiomeric form D-glutamic acid all inversely correlated with tumor hypoxia. Intermediates of the serine synthesis pathway, which is known to be modulated by hypoxia, also correlated with tumor hypoxia (phosphoserine and serine). Moreover, following treatment, lactic acid was modulated by treatment, likely in response to a hypoxia mediated modulation of oxidative vs glycolytic metabolism. In summary, although our results require further validation in larger patients’ cohorts, we have identified candidate metabolic biomarkers that could evaluate the extent of tumor hypoxia and predict the benefit of combined bevacizumab and evofosfamide treatment in GBM following bevacizumab failure.

Abstract Background Quantitative imaging can facilitate patient stratification in clinical trials. The hypoxia-activated prodrug evofosfamide recently failed a phase III trial in pancreatic cancer. However, the study did not attempt to select for patients with hypoxic tumors. We tested the ability of 18F-fluoromisonidazole to predict evofosfamide uptake in an orthotopic xenograft model (BxPC3). Methods Two forms of evofosfamide were used: (1) labeled on the active moiety (3H) and (2) on the hypoxia targeting nitroimidazole group (14C). Tumor uptake of evofosfamide and 18F-fluoromisonidazole was counted ex vivo. Autoradiography of 14C and 18F coupled with pimonidazole immunohistochemistry revealed the spatial distributions of prodrug, radiotracer, and hypoxia. Results There was significant individual variation in 18F-fluoromisonidazole uptake, and a significant correlation between normalized 18F-fluoromisonidazole and both 3H-labeled and 14C-labeled evofosfamide. 18F-fluoromisonidazole and 14C-evofosfamide both localized in hypoxic regions as identified by pimonidazole. Conclusion 18F-fluoromisonidazole predicts evofosfamide uptake in a preclinical pancreatic tumor model.

Aims: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) form hypovascular and hypoxic tumors, which are difficult to treat with current chemotherapy regimens. Gemcitabine (GEM) is often used as a first-line treatment for PDACs but has issues with chemoresistance and penetration in the interior of the tumor. Evofosfamide, a hypoxia-activated prodrug, has been shown to be effective in combination with GEM, although the mechanism of each drug on the other has not been established. We used mouse xenografts from two cell lines (MIA Paca-2 and SU.86.86) with different tumor microenvironmental characteristics to probe the action of each drug on the other. Results: GEM treatment enhanced survival times in mice with SU.86.86 leg xenografts (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.35, p = 0.03) but had no effect on MIA Paca-2 mice (HR = 0.91, 95% confidence interval = 0.37–2.25, p = 0.84). Conversely, evofosfamide did not improve survival times in SU.86.86 mice to a statistically significant degree (HR = 0.57, p = 0.22). Electron paramagnetic resonance imaging showed that oxygenation worsened in MIA Paca-2 tumors when treated with GEM, providing a direct mechanism for the activation of the hypoxia-activated prodrug evofosfamide by GEM. Sublethal amounts of either treatment enhanced the toxicity of other treatment in vitro in SU.86.86 but not in MIA Paca-2. By the biomarker γH2AX, combination treatment increased the number of double-stranded DNA lesions in vitro for SU.86.86 but not MIA Paca-2. Innovation and Conclusion: The synergy between GEM and evofosfamide appears to stem from the dual action of GEMs effect on tumor vasculature and inhibition by GEM of the homologous recombination DNA repair process. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 39, 432–444. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Evofosfamide (Evo or TH302) is a hypoxia-activated prodrug which is reduced leading to the release of alkylating agent bromo-isophosphoramide mustard, which has shown safety and signals of efficacy in a prior phase 1 study in recurrent glioblastoma. We performed a dual center single-arm Phase II study to expand on the safety and efficacy of Evo plus bevacizumab in bevacizumab refractory glioblastoma. 33 patients with bevacizumab refractory GBM received Evo 670 mg/m2 in combination with Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks. Assessments included adverse events, response, and survival. Median age of patients was 47 (range 19–76) and 24 (69%) were male. At the time of study entry, 9 (26%) had ongoing corticosteroid use. ECOG performance status was 0 or 1 in 83% of patients. Patients were mostly heavily pretreated with 77% have three or more prior regimens. A total of 12 patients (36%) suffered grade 3–4 drug associated adverse event (AE); no grade 5 AE were reported. Of the 33 evaluable patients, best response was PR in 3 (9%), SD in 14 (43%), and PD in 16 (48%) with responses confirmed by a second reviewer. Median time to progression of disease was 53 days (95% CI 42–113) and Median time to death was 129 days (95% CI 86–199 days). Progression free survival at 4 months (PFS-4) on Evo-Bev was 31%, which was a statistically significant improvement over the historical rate of 3%. The median overall survival of patients receiving Evo-Bevacizumab was 4.6 months (95% CI 2.9–6.6). The progression free survival of patients on Evo-Bevacizumab met the primary endpoint of progression free survival at 4 months of 31%, although the clinical significance of this may be limited. Given the patient population and Phase II design, these clinical outcomes will need further validation.

The goal of this study is to develop a mathematical model that captures the interaction between evofosfamide, immunotherapy, and the hypoxic landscape of the tumor in the treatment of tumors. Recently, we showed that evofosfamide, a hypoxia-activated prodrug, can synergistically improve treatment outcomes when combined with immunotherapy, while evofosfamide alone showed no effects in an in vivo syngeneic model of colorectal cancer. However, the mechanisms behind the interaction between the tumor microenvironment in the context of oxygenation (hypoxic, normoxic), immunotherapy, and tumor cells are not fully understood. To begin to understand this issue, we develop a system of ordinary differential equations to simulate the growth and decline of tumors and their vascularization (oxygenation) in response to treatment with evofosfamide and immunotherapy (6 combinations of scenarios). The model is calibrated to data from in vivo experiments on mice implanted with colon adenocarcinoma cells and longitudinally imaged with [ 18 F]-fluoromisonidazole ([ 18 F]FMISO) positron emission tomography (PET) to quantify hypoxia. The results show that evofosfamide is able to rescue the immune response and sensitize hypoxic tumors to immunotherapy. In the hypoxic scenario, evofosfamide reduces tumor burden by $ 45.07 \pm 2.55 $%, compared to immunotherapy alone, as measured by tumor volume. The model accurately predicts the temporal evolution of five different treatment scenarios, including control, hypoxic tumors that received immunotherapy, normoxic tumors that received immunotherapy, evofosfamide alone, and hypoxic tumors that received combination immunotherapy and evofosfamide. The average concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between predicted and observed tumor volume is $ 0.86 \pm 0.05 $. Interestingly, the model values to fit those five treatment arms was unable to accurately predict the response of normoxic tumors to combination evofosfamide and immunotherapy (CCC = $ -0.064 \pm 0.003 $). However, guided by the sensitivity analysis to rank the most influential parameters on the tumor volume, we found that increasing the tumor death rate due to immunotherapy by a factor of $ 18.6 \pm 9.3 $ increases CCC of $ 0.981 \pm 0.001 $. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to mathematically predict and describe the increased efficacy of immunotherapy following evofosfamide.

Tumor hypoxia contributes to resistance to anticancer therapies. Hypoxia-activated prodrugs (HAPs) selectively target hypoxic cells and their activity can extend to well-oxygenated areas of tumors via diffusion of active metabolites. This type of bystander effect has been suggested to be responsible for the single agent activity of the clinical-stage HAP evofosfamide (TH-302) but direct evidence is lacking. To dissect the contribution of bystander effects to TH-302 activity, we implemented a Green's function pharmacokinetic (PK) model to simulate the spatial distribution of O2, TH-302 and its cytotoxic metabolites, bromo-isophosphoramide mustard (Br-IPM) and its dichloro derivative isophosphoramide mustard (IPM), in two digitized tumor microvascular networks. The model was parameterized from literature and experimentally, including measurement of diffusion coefficients of TH-302 and its metabolites in multicellular layer cultures. The latter studies demonstrate that Br-IPM and IPM cannot diffuse significantly from the cells in which they are generated, although evidence was obtained for diffusion of the hydroxylamine metabolite of TH-302. The spatially resolved PK model was linked to a pharmacodynamic (PD) model that describes cell killing probability at each point in the tumor microregion as a function of Br-IPM and IPM exposure. The resulting PK/PD model accurately predicted previously reported monotherapy activity of TH-302 in H460 tumors, without invoking a bystander effect, demonstrating that the notable single agent activity of TH-302 in tumors can be accounted for by significant bioreductive activation of TH-302 even in oxic regions, driven by the high plasma concentrations achievable with this well-tolerated prodrug.

Tumour hypoxia is a marker of poor prognosis and failure of chemoradiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), providing a strategy for therapeutic intervention in this setting. To evaluate the utility of the hypoxia-activated prodrug evofosfamide (TH-302) in HNSCC, we established ten early passage patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of HNSCC that were characterised by their histopathology, hypoxia status, gene expression, and sensitivity to evofosfamide. All PDX models closely resembled the histology of the patient tumours they were derived from. Pimonidazole-positive tumour hypoxic fractions ranged from 1.7−7.9% in line with reported HNSCC clinical values, while mRNA expression of the Toustrup hypoxia gene signature showed close correlations between PDX and matched patient tumours, together suggesting the PDX models may accurately model clinical tumour hypoxia. Evofosfamide as a single agent (50 mg/kg IP, qd × 5 for three weeks) demonstrated antitumour efficacy that was variable across the PDX models, ranging from complete regressions in one p16-positive PDX model to lack of significant activity in the three most resistant models. Despite all PDX models showing evidence of tumour hypoxia, and hypoxia being essential for activation of evofosfamide, the antitumour activity of evofosfamide only weakly correlated with tumour hypoxia status determined by pimonidazole immunohistochemistry. Other candidate evofosfamide sensitivity genes—MKI67, POR, and SLFN11—did not strongly influence evofosfamide sensitivity in univariate analyses, although a weak significant relationship with MKI67 was observed, while SLFN11 expression was lost in PDX tumours. Overall, these data confirm that evofosfamide has antitumour activity in clinically-relevant PDX tumour models of HNSCC and support further clinical evaluation of this drug in HNSCC patients. Further research is required to identify those factors that, alongside hypoxia, can influence sensitivity to evofosfamide and could act as predictive biomarkers to support its use in precision medicine therapy of HNSCC.

Antiangiogenic therapy has shown promising results in preclinical and clinical trials. However, tumor cells acquire resistance to this therapy by gaining ability to survive and proliferate under hypoxia induced by antiangiogenic therapy. Combining antiangiogenic therapy with hypoxia-activated prodrugs can overcome this limitation. Here, we have tested the combination of antiangiogenic drug sunitinib in combination with hypoxia-activated prodrug evofosfamide in neuroblastoma. In vitro, neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-BE(2) was 40-folds sensitive to evofosfamide under hypoxia compared to normoxia. In IV metastatic model, evofosfamide significantly increased mice survival compared to the vehicle (P=.02). In SK-N-BE(2) subcutaneous xenograft model, we tested two different treatment regimens using 30 mg/kg sunitinib and 50 mg/kg evofosfamide. Here, sunitinib therapy when started along with evofosfamide treatment showed higher efficacy compared to single agents in subcutaneous SK-N-BE(2) xenograft model, whereas sunitinib when started 7 days after evofosfamide treatment did not have any advantage compared to treatment with either single agent. Immunofluorescence of tumor sections revealed higher number of apoptotic cells and hypoxic areas compared to either single agent when both treatments were started together. Treatment with 80 mg/kg sunitinib with 50 mg/kg evofosfamide was significantly superior to single agents in both xenograft and metastatic models. This study confirms the preclinical efficacy of sunitinib and evofosfamide in murine models of aggressive neuroblastoma. Sunitinib enhances the efficacy of evofosfamide by increasing hypoxic areas, and evofosfamide targets hypoxic tumor cells. Consequently, each drug enhances the activity of the other.

Abstract Background Tumor hypoxia is considered an important factor in metastasis and disease relapse. Evofosfamide is a hypoxia-activated prodrug that selectively targets the hypoxic regions of solid tumors. As hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) is overexpressed in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) tissues, we performed the present study to evaluate the efficacy profile of evofosfamide in NPC. Methods We evaluated the efficacy of evofosfamide as a single agent or combined with cisplatin (DDP) in the NPC cell lines CNE-2, HONE-1 and HNE-1, and in nude mouse xenograft tumor models. Results Evofosfamide exhibited hypoxia-selective cytotoxicity in NPC cell lines, with 50% inhibition concentration (IC50) values of 8.33 ± 0.75, 7.62 ± 0.67, and 0.31 ± 0.07 μmol/L under hypoxia in CNE-2, HONE-1 and HNE-1 cells, respectively. The sensitization ranged from ninefold to greater than 300-fold under hypoxia compared with normoxia controls. The combination of evofosfamide with DDP had a synergistic effect on cytotoxicity in the NPC cell lines by combination index values assessment. Cell cycle G2 phase was arrested after treated with 0.05 μmol/L evofosfamide under hypoxia. Histone H2AX phosphorylation (γH2AX) (a marker of DNA damage) expression increased while HIF-1α expression suppressed after evofosfamide treatment under hypoxic conditions. In the HNE-1 NPC xenograft models, evofosfamide exhibited antitumor activity both as a single agent and combined with DDP. Hypoxic regions in xenograft tissue were reduced after both evofosfamide monotherapy and combined therapy with DDP. Conclusions Our results present preclinical evidence for targeting the selective hypoxic portion of NPC by evofosfamide as a single agent and combined with DDP and provide rationale for the potential clinical application of evofosfamide for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

This study was designed to investigate the effect of single-dose radiation therapy (RT) in combination with evofosfamide (TH-302), a hypoxia-activated prodrug, in a pre-clinical model of pancreatic cancer. AsPC1 tumors were implanted orthotopically in the pancreas of nude mice. Tumors were treated with 15 Gy of RT, using a 1 cm diameter field, and delivered as a continuous arc. Image-guidance to center the field on the tumor was based on CT imaging with intraperitoneal contrast. Evofosfamide (100 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered 3 hours before RT. Tumor volumes were measured using ultrasound, and regrowth curves were plotted. Tumor hypoxia and cell proliferation were measured using pimonidazole and the thymidine analog EdU, respectively. In vitro clonogenic assays were performed. Tumors were shown to contain substantial areas of hypoxia, as calculated by percent pimonidazole staining. Evofosfamide was active in these tumors, as demonstrated by a significant reduction in uptake of the thymidine analog EdU. This effect was visible in oxygenated tissue, consistent with the previously reported bystander effects of evofosfamide. RT produced significant regrowth delay, as did evofosfamide. The combination of both agents produced a growth delay that was at least equal to the sum of the two treatments given separately. The improvement in tumor response when evofosfamide is combined with RT supports the hypothesis that hypoxia is a cause of radioresistance in high dose RT for pancreatic cancer. Assessing the efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiation treatment and evofosfamide is warranted in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Glioblastomas (GBM) are the most common and aggressive form of primary malignant brain tumor in the adult population, and, despite modern therapies, patients often develop recurrent disease, and the disease remains incurable with median survival below 2 years. Resistance to bevacizumab is driven by hypoxia in the tumor and evofosfamide is a hypoxia-activated prodrug, which we tested in a phase 2, dual center (University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio and Dana Farber Cancer Institute) clinical trial after bevacizumab failure. Tumor hypoxic volume was quantified by 18F-misonidazole PET. To identify circulating metabolic biomarkers of tumor hypoxia in patients, we used a high-resolution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based approach to profile blood metabolites and their specific enantiomeric forms using untargeted approaches. Moreover, to evaluate early response to treatment, we characterized changes in circulating metabolite levels during treatment with combined bevacizumab and evofosfamide in recurrent GBM after bevacizumab failure. Gamma aminobutyric acid, and glutamic acid as well as its enantiomeric form D-glutamic acid all inversely correlated with tumor hypoxia. Intermediates of the serine synthesis pathway, which is known to be modulated by hypoxia, also correlated with tumor hypoxia (phosphoserine and serine). Moreover, following treatment, lactic acid was modulated by treatment, likely in response to a hypoxia mediated modulation of oxidative vs glycolytic metabolism. In summary, although our results require further validation in larger patients' cohorts, we have identified candidate metabolic biomarkers that could evaluate the extent of tumor hypoxia and predict the benefit of combined bevacizumab and evofosfamide treatment in GBM following bevacizumab failure., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Lodi, Pandey, Chiou, Bhattacharya, Huang, Pan, Burgman, Yi, Tiziani and Brenner.)