Search

Total pelvic exenteration is a highly morbid procedure performed for locally advanced pelvic malignancies. We describe our experience with three patients who underwent robotic total pelvic exenteration with laparoscopic rectus flap and compare perioperative characteristics to our open experience. Demographic, tumor, operative, and perioperative factors were examined with descriptive statistics reported. Mean operative times were similar between the two groups. When compared to open total pelvic exenteration cases (n=9), median estimated blood loss, ICU stay, and hospital stay were all decreased. These data show robotic pelvic exenteration with laparoscopic rectus flap is technically feasible. The surgery was well tolerated with low blood loss and comparable operative times to the open surgery. Further study is needed to confirm the oncologic efficacy and the suggested improvement in surgical morbidity.

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to grant states the authority to reject Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act without penalty threatened the implementation of this polarized health policy. While many Republican-controlled states followed their national allies and rejected Medicaid expansion, others engaged in bipartisan implementation. Why were some Republican states willing to reject the national partisan agenda and cooperate with Democrats in Washington? I focus on the role of electoral competition within states. I conclude that although electoral competition has been shown to encourage partisan polarization within the states, the combination of intergovernmental implementation and Medicaid expansion's association with public welfare reverses this dynamic. I employ a Cox proportional-hazards model to examine the impact of state partisan ideology and competition on the likelihood of state Medicaid expansion. I find that strong inter-party competition mitigates the impact of more extreme partisan ideologies, encouraging potentially bipartisan negotiation with the federal administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper examines the consequences of economic downturns for states’ redistributive politics. We track state policies from 1980 through 2010 and illustrate how economic downturns led states to adopt budget-balancing policies by suppressing both the increased spending on programs benefiting the poor otherwise expected under Democratic Party control and the tax cuts for the wealthy otherwise expected under Republican Party control. We also undertake a natural experiment case study—comparing the forty Democratic and Republican governors in office right before (2007–2008) and after (2009–2010) the onset of the Great Recession. We find that Republican governors were less likely to propose spending and increased calls for spending cuts; yet, no similar shift in tax proposals was evident with continued calls for tax cuts to the wealthy. Democratic governors exhibited a similar pattern, but were less responsive and more likely to maintain their earlier policy proposals even after a significant downturn in the national economy. Together, these findings highlight how economic and political conditions interact with one another to shape “who gets what, when, and how from government,” as well as clarify that we must ask and answer these questions separately for taxing and spending to capture the complex politics of redistribution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) remains highly morbid despite improving surgical techniques. As the median age of diagnosis is 73, many patients are elderly at the time of cystectomy. We compare perioperative surgical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing robotic vs open radical cystectomy (RC). Materials and Methods: Patients >75 years at time of RC were identified. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and perioperative variables were examined. Estimated blood loss (EBL) and length of stay (LOS) data were collected with multivariate linear regression analysis performed to assess whether technique was independently associated with outcomes. Results: Eighty-seven patients >75 years of age underwent cystectomy for MIBC (58 open, 29 robotic). Mean age was 79.6 (±3.2) and 79.2 (±3.5) for open and robotic groups, respectively ( p = 0.64). There were no significant differences in baseline comorbidities, clinical or pathologic stage, or use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was similar ( p = 0.08). Robotic cystectomy had significantly longer mean OR times ( p < 0.001). On multivariate analyses, robotic surgery was associated with −389cc less EBL (95% CI −547 to −230, p < 0.001) and a −1.5-day-shortened LOS (95%CI −2.9 to −0.2, p = 0.02) compared with open surgery. There were no significant differences in surgical complications or 90-day readmission rates between the two groups. Conclusions: Robotic cystectomy is safe and feasible in an elderly population. We observed longer OR times with robotic surgery, but with decreased EBL, shorter hospital stays, and comparable complication and readmission rates with open RC. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) has been associated with worse outcomes across tumor types, including bladder cancer. We report our institutional experience with PBT utilization in the setting of radical cystectomy (RC) for patients with bladder cancer, exploring whether timing of PBT receipt influences perioperative and oncologic outcomes., Methods: Consecutive patients with bladder cancer treated with RC were identified. PBT was defined as red blood cell transfusion during RC or the postoperative admission. Clinicopathologic and peri and/or postoperative parameters were extracted and compared between patients who did and did not receive PBT using Mann Whitney U Test, chi-square, and log-rank test. Overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated with the Kaplan Meier method. Univariate/multivariate logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to identify variables associated with postoperative and oncologic outcomes, respectively., Results: The cohort consisted of 747 patients (77% men; median age 67 years). Median follow-up was 61.5 months (95% CI 55.8-67.2) At least one postoperative complication (90-day morbidity) occurred in 394 (53%) patients. Median OS and RFS were 91.8 months (95% CI: 76.0-107.6) and 66.0 months (95% CI: 48.3-83.7), respectively. On multivariate analysis, intraoperative, but not postoperative, BT was independently associated with shorter OS (HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.32-2.29) and RFS (HR: 1.55, 95%CI: 1.20-2.01), after adjusting for relevant clinicopathologic variables. PBT (intra- or post- operative) was significantly associated with prolonged postoperative hospitalization ≥10 days., Conclusions: Intraoperative BT was associated with inferior OS and RFS, and PBT overall was associated with prolonged hospitalization following RC. Further studies are needed to validate this finding and explore potential causes for this observation., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Leonidas N. Diamantopoulos: no conflicts to disclose;Rishi R. Sekar: no conflicts to disclose; Sarah K. Holt: no conflicts to disclose; Ali R. Khaki: no conflicts to disclose; Natalie J Miller: no conflicts to disclose; Adam Gadzinski: no conflicts to disclose; Yaw A. Nyame: no conflicts to disclose; Brian R. Winters: no conflicts to disclose; Funda Vakar-Lopez: no conflicts to disclose; Maria S. Tretiakova: no conflicts to disclose; Sarah P. Psutka: Honoraria - Prime; Education; Travel, Accommodations, Expenses - Prime Education. John L. Gore: Research Grant funding from Ferring Pharmaceuticals.Daniel W. Lin: DSMB for the POTOMAC study with AstraZeneca; Consulting or Advisory Role – Astellas Pharma, Clovis Oncology, Dendreon; Research Funding – GenomeDx; Genomic Health; MDxHealth. George R. Schade: Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property - Global Cancer Technology. Andrew C. Hsieh: Honoraria - Hotspot Therapeutics; Research Funding - eFFECTOR Inc; Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property - MTOR modulators and uses thereof Patent number: 9629843; Use Of Translational Profiling To Identify Target Molecules For Therapeutic Treatment, Publication number: 20140288097. John K. Lee: Research Funding - Immunomedics; Todd Yezefski: no conflicts to disclose; Michael T. Schweizer: Paid consultant to  Resverlogix. He has received research funding to his institution from Immunomedics, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Madison Vaccines, Tmunity and Hoffmann-La Roche. Heather H. Cheng: Research Funding - Astellas Medivation, Clovis Oncology, Color Foundation, Janssen, Sanofi. Consulting for AstraZeneca. Royalties – UpToDate. Evan Y. Yu: consulting for Abbvie, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Clovis, Dendreon, Incyte, Janssen, Merck, Pharmacyclics, QED, Sanofi, and Seattle Genetics; institutional research support from Bayer, Blue Earth, Daiichi-Sankyo, Dendreon, Merck, Pharmacyclics, Taiho, and Seattle Genetics (all unrelated in last 3 years).Lawrence D. True: Stock and Other Ownership Interests – Lightspeed Micro Research Funding, Ventana Medical Systems; Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property – Lens on an open-top lightsheet microscope. Robert B. Montgomery: Research Funding – AstraZeneca, ESSA, Ferring, Janssen Oncology. Petros Grivas (all unrelated in the last 3 years): consulting for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis Oncology, Dyania Health, Driver, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Foundation Medicine, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Genzyme, Heron Therapeutics, Immunomedics, Janssen, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics, QED Therapeutics; institutional research funding from AstraZeneca, Bavarian Nordic, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis Oncology, Debiopharm, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunomedics, Kure It Cancer Research, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, Oncogenex, Pfizer, QED Therapeutics. Jonathan L. Wright: Royalties – UpToDate; Clinical Trials - Movember Foundation, Merck, Nucleix, Altor Biosciences; Consulting – Sanofi Genzyme., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)