Search

Your search keyword '"Anne Lemarie"' showing total 4 results
Start Over "Anne Lemarie"
4 results on '"Anne Lemarie"'

1. The Journal of Clinical Cytology and Cytopathology

Author

Mehran Karimi, Juan José Vilanova, Bernard Huynh, L. Vass, Midori Ishii, Johnny Ayivi, Behnam Abdollahi, Catia Sintoni, Volker Schneider, Bohuslav Pazderník, Weiji Shi, Anne Lemarie, Elisabeth Gilbert, Babita Jindal, Vincent Servois, Mansoor Nasim, Aiman Zaher, Stephen S. Raab, Masafumi Tsuzuku, Norio Motono, Mithra Baliga, Abdelmonem Elhosseiny, Uma Nahar Saikia, Ashim Das, Philippe Beuzeboc, Patrizia Maioli, Adolfo García-Riego, Jaroslava Dušková, Tsutomu Tabata, Ming Guo, Masood Hosseinzadeh, Antonius G.J.M. Hanselaar, Nobuhiro Takeshima, Pranab Dey, In Ae Park, Janet Schneller, Alaa M Afify, Jyoti Rege, Hiroshi Kanno, Masamichi Hara, Gioia Montanari, Yoshiaki Inayama, Patricia E. Saigo, Wai-Kuen Ng, Richard R. Barakat, Yuji Arai, Jerzy Klijanienko, Sophie Ferlicot, Yasuo Hirai, Naomi Kawano, Basim M. Al-Khafaji, Sanjeev Bhalla, R. Gordon Wright, Ki Hwa Park, Sathima Natarajan, Giuseppe Lanzanova, Akbar Safaei, Todd Sheridan, Lourdes R. Ylagan, Marina Visani, Marshall Solomon, Donatella Sama, Olivier Coué, Gholam Reza Bedayat, Carolyn A. Webber, Biman Saikia, Shi Nae Lee, U.B. Saraiya, Kazuhiro Yamauchi, Kazuhiro Mita, Eric J. Suba, Katsuhiko Hasumi, Yukiko Nishio, Tanuja Shet, Adalsteinn D. Brown, Steven A. Bigler, Frederic Cas, Howard T. Thaler, Renzo Barrasso, Monowar Hossain, Perikala V. Kumar, Laura Guerrini, Hyo Pyo Lee, Mai Gu, Jeffrey D. Shiffer, Patrizia Schincaglia, Amanda Herbert, Tullia Cotignoli, Abdollah Moosavi, Peter A. Humphrey, Habib Noorani, Jae Weon Kim, Seung Wan Chae, Hidetaka Nishida, Kobilková J, John W. Bishop, Olivier Delattre, John H.F. Smith, Yukio Nakatani, Christine Bergeron, César Cuiñas, Leena Naik, Philippe Vielh, Walid E. Khalbuss, Luciano B. Lemos, and Sonya Naryshkin

Subjects
Pathology, medicine.medical_specialty, Histology, business.industry, Cytopathology, Cytology, Medicine, General Medicine, business, Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Published
2001
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Accuracy of Thin-Layer Cytology in Patients Undergoing Cervical Cone Biopsy

Author

Frederic Cas, Bernard Huynh, Johnny Ayivi, Renzo Barrasso, Christine Bergeron, Anne Lemarie, and John W. Bishop

Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty, Histology, Biopsy, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cervix Uteri, Sensitivity and Specificity, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cervical cone biopsy, Cytology, medicine, Humans, Cervix neoplasm, Mass screening, Vaginal Smears, Gynecology, Histocytological Preparation Techniques, medicine.diagnostic_test, business.industry, General Medicine, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Cytopathology, High Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Female, Histopathology, business, Nuclear medicine
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of thin-layer cytology with Autocyte PREP® (TriPath Imaging Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) with conventional smears in 500 women undergoing cervical cone biopsy. STUDY DESIGN; The study was performed among 500 consecutive women presenting for cone biopsy for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on biopsy in 350 (70%) and discrepant cytology/colpohistology in 150 (30%). Before performing a cone biopsy, two cervical samples were collected for conventional smears and thin-layer cytologic slides, with randomization of the order. Conventional smears were stained and diagnosed at Pasteur Cerba, while thin-layer cytologic slides were processed at a local TriPath office (Meylan, France) and sent in a masked fashion for screening at Pasteur Cerba. Any slides initially read as normal were reviewed again and reported without knowledge of the other cytologic or cone biopsy data. The final cytologic diagnoses for the two methods were compared with histopathology of the cone biopsy. RESULTS: The conventional smear was unsatisfactory in 58 (11.6%) of cases, while there were 4 (0.8%) unsatisfactory thin-layer cytologic slides (P

Published
2001
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Quality Control of Cervical Cytology in High-Risk Women

Author

Ariane Ghezi, Anne Lemarie, Marco Masseroli, Christine Bergeron, Laurie J. Mango, and Leopold G. Koss

Subjects
Gynecology, medicine.medical_specialty, education.field_of_study, Histology, Third party, business.industry, Obstetrics, Population, Cervical cytology, General Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Past history, Cytopathology, Medicine, False positive rate, Medical diagnosis, business, education, Kappa
Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of the PAPNET System with conventional rescreening of negative cervical smears in a high-risk population. STUDY DESIGN Three thousand ninety-seven negative cervical smears from women with past history of cervical abnormalities were rescreened manually and with the PAPNET System. There were two reviews of PAPNET images: the first by two cytotechnologists with limited exposure to the instrument, and the second, limited to smears with discrepant diagnoses, by an expert in the use of the system. The remaining discrepant smears were submitted to a blinded microscopic review by a third party. The a priori consensus diagnosis was arbitrarily established when the result of two of the three reviews--manual, PAPNET and the independent third review--were concordant. The results of rescreening were compared with available biopsies. RESULTS On manual rescreening of the 3,097 smears, 2,901 (93.66%) were reported as negative and 170 (5.49%) as abnormal. On the first PAPNET review, 2,938 (94.87%) were reported as negative and 150 (4.84%) as abnormal. There were 144 smears with discrepant diagnoses. After the second PAPNET review of these discrepant smears, the agreement between manual and PAPNET rescreening rose from 94.27% to 95.58%. A final, blinded review of 89 residual discrepant smears was used to establish consensus diagnoses. The diagnoses made by PAPNET-assisted rescreening agreed much better with the consensus diagnoses than did manual rescreening (Kappa = .61 vs. Kappa = -.32, P < .001). When compared with the results of 50 available biopsies, PAPNET-assisted rescreening also had a somewhat lower false negative rate (sensitivity 58.82% vs. 41.18%, P = .17) and a statistically significant lower false positive rate (specificity 63.64% vs. 36.36%, P = .01). CONCLUSION PAPNET-assisted rescreening, when carried out by an experienced person, is more efficient than manual rescreening.

Published
2000
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Torsten Löwhagen, M.D., F.I.A.C. 1929–1999

Author

Joan Cangiarella, Cengiz Erçin, Cheng Har Yip, Abrão Rapoport, Sigmund Dawiskiba, Fernando Lopez-Rios, Junzo Fujiyama, Yuka Fujita, Elisabetta Omodeo Zorini, Hiroyuki Matsumoto, Renzo Boldorini, Tanuja Shet, Gita Jayaram, Hussein Hodjati, Houssam Attal, Timothy J. O'Leary, Ricardo González-Cámpora, Enrique Espinosa, Miguel V. Tellado, Pennie J. Symmans, Linda D. Ferrell, Maria A. Abadi, Grace C. H. Yang, David Akle Fierro, Brian W. Loggie, Etsuko Nakamura, Manuel González-Barón, Ariane Ghezi, Jean-Marc Cohen, Nuria Rodríguez-Salas, Lester D.R. Thompson, Dilip Giri, Patricia E. Saigo, Shuji Ogino, Maurizio Mena, J. R. Farndon, Fraser Symmans, Leopold G. Koss, Herman T. Yee, Yuichi Ishikawa, Begoña de las Heras, Nuria Alberti, Dorothy L. Rosenthal, Yasuhiro Yamazaki, Toshiaki Manabe, Zafer Canturk, Takuo Kanahara, Kouko Yamazaki, Masafumi Murayama, Sally-Beth Buckner, Ming Tsuey Chew, Toru Hirose, Carmen Adriana Bañuelos Pánuco, Rosa M. Davila, Dale A. Cheuvront, Concepción Otal Salaverri, Pilar Zamora, Laurie J. Mango, Katsuyuki Tobise, Fadi W. Abdul-Karim, Guido Monga, Meenakshi Swain, Rogério Aparecido Dedivitis, Gregory Bennett, Ahmet Alponat, Mitsuyoshi Hirokawa, Nadia Al-Kaisi, Manuela Nebuloni, Henryk A. Domanski, María C. Miranda, Kim R. Geisinger, Jyoti Rege, Latha R. Pisharodi, Ahamd Monabati, Pedro de Agustín, Hugo Galera Ruíz, John W. Bishop, Neşet Nuri Gönüllü, Marco Masseroli, Elba Reyes Maldonado, Jo Ann Shaw, Paolo Viganò, Mercedes Fernández de Castro, Wain L. White, Anil Çubukçu, Carol F. Adair, Keiichi Fujiwara, Irma Deleón Rodríguez, Christina S. Kong, Juan Miranda Murillo, Tetsuo Shimizu, Ahmet C. Kaur, Francisco Vázquez Ramírez, Donald Briscoe, Marcos Brasilino de Carvalho, José Méndez, Michio Shimizu, Lydia Alejandra Martínez Guzmán, Rana S. Hoda, Christine Bergeron, Ana M. Jiménez-Gordo, Anne Lemarie, Mayumi Ueno, Prabodh K. Gupta, Richard R. Barakat, Edward Alexander Sheffield, Hideaki Yamauchi, Zhanqing Yan, Jerry Waisman, Caroline Jane Calder, Perikala V. Kumar, Kenneth L. Sims, Enrique González, Nadir Paksoy, Radu Mihai, Oscar Argueta Manzano, N A C S Wong, Andrés Pérez-Barrios, Yukitoshi Satoh, Martin Appenzeller, Ichiro Kohno, Maj James R. Hallman, Edward L. Amorosi, and Abdolrasool Talei

Subjects
Histology, business.industry, Stereochemistry, Medicine, General Medicine, business, Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Published
2000
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results