Search

BACKGROUND: Vestibular schwannomas (VSs) related to neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) are challenging tumors. The increasing use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) necessitates further investigations of its role and safety. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate tumor control, freedom from additional treatment (FFAT), serviceable hearing preservation, and radiation-related risks of patients with NF2 after SRS for VS.METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 267 patients with NF2 (328 VSs) who underwent single-session SRS at 12 centers participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation. The median patient age was 31 years (IQR, 21-45 years), and 52% were male. RESULTS: A total of 328 tumors underwent SRS during a median follow-up time of 59 months (IQR, 23-112 months). At 10 and 15 years, the tumor control rates were 77% (95% CI: 69%-84%) and 52% (95% CI: 40%-64%), respectively, and the FFAT rate were 85% (95% CI: 79%-90%) and 75% (95% CI: 65%-86%), respectively. At 5 and 10 years, the serviceable hearing preservation rates were 64% (95% CI: 55%-75%) and 35% (95% CI: 25%-54%), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, age (hazards ratio: 1.03 [95% CI: 1.01-1.05]; P= .02) and bilateral VSs (hazards ratio: 4.56 [95% CI: 1.05-19.78]; P= .04) were predictors for serviceable hearing loss. Neither radiation-induced tumors nor malignant transformation were encountered in this cohort. CONCLUSION: Although the absolute volumetric tumor progression rate was 48% at 15 years, the rate of FFAT related to VS was 75% at 15 years after SRS. None of the patients with NF2-related VS developed a new radiation-related neoplasm or malignant transformation after SRS., NA

Objective: the optimal management of asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas is not well defined. The aim of this study is to compare the imaging and clinical outcomes of patients with asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas managed either with upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or active surveillance. Methods: this retrospective, multicenter study involved patients with asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas. The study end-points included local tumor control and the development of new neurological deficits attributable to the tumor. Factors associated with tumor progression and neurological morbidity were also analyzed. Results: the combined unmatched cohort included 417 patients. Following propensity score matching for age, tumor volume, and follow-up 110 patients remained in each cohort. Tumor control was achieved in 98.2% and 61.8% of the SRS and active surveillance cohorts, respectively. SRS was associated with superior local tumor control (p < 0.001, HR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.002-0.13) compared to active surveillance. Three patients (2.7%) in the SRS cohort and six (5.5%) in the active surveillance cohort exhibited neurological deterioration. One (0.9%) patient in the SRS-treated and 11 (10%) patients in the active surveillance cohort required surgical management of their meningioma during follow-up. Conclusions: SRS is associated with superior local control of asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas as compared to active surveillance and does so with low morbidity rates. SRS should be offered as an alternative to active surveillance as the initial management of asymptomatic skull base meningiomas. Active surveillance policies do not currently specify the optimal time to intervention when meningioma growth is noted. Our results indicate that if active surveillance is the initial management of choice, SRS should be recommended when radiologic tumor progression is noted and prior to clinical progression., NA

Meningioma, a type of brain tumor, is a common incidental finding on brain imaging. The best management approach for patients with an incidental meningioma remains unclear. This retrospective multi-center study investigated the outcomes of patients with an incidental meningioma in a frontobasal location, who were managed with active surveillance (n = 28) compared to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (n = 84). Within 5 years of follow-up, SRS improved the radiological control of incidental frontobasal meningiomas (0% vs. 52%), but no symptoms occurred in either group. In the active surveillance cohort, 12% underwent an intervention for tumor growth. The findings of this study provide information to enable shared decision making between clinicians and patients with incidental frontobasal meningiomas. Meningioma is a common incidental finding, and clinical course varies based on anatomical location. The aim of this sub-analysis of the IMPASSE study was to compare the outcomes of patients with an incidental frontobasal meningioma who underwent active surveillance to those who underwent upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Data were retrospectively collected from 14 centres. The active surveillance (n = 28) and SRS (n = 84) cohorts were compared unmatched and matched for age, sex, and duration of follow-up (n = 25 each). The study endpoints included tumor progression, new symptom development, and need for further intervention. Tumor progression occurred in 52.0% and 0% of the matched active surveillance and SRS cohorts, respectively (p < 0.001). Five patients (6.0%) treated with SRS developed treatment related symptoms compared to none in the active monitoring cohort (p = 0.329). No patients in the matched cohorts developed symptoms attributable to treatment. Three patients managed with active surveillance (10.7%, unmatched; 12.0%, matched) underwent an intervention for tumor growth with no persistent side effects after treatment. No patients subject to SRS underwent f, NA