'Physiker' versus 'Organiker' Views of Reaction 'Mechanism': How Natural Resonance Theory Bridges the Gap

Traditional physical chemistry conceptions of reaction mechanism are formulated in terms of stationary points of an Arrhenius-style "energy profile" that differs sharply (in purpose and form) from the corresponding Robinson-style "arrow-pushing" mechanistic conceptions of organic chemistry. We show here how these diverse "mechanistic" conceptions can be reconciled in a unified computational protocol based on a natural resonance theoretic (NRT) description of successive "bond shifts" between reactant and product bonding patterns. For pedagogical purposes, we employ a model S[subscript N]2 halide exchange reaction described at a routine level of density functional theory, but the outlined NRT protocol involves no intrinsic dependence on theory level, reaction order, or perceived "elementary" character of the reaction. The NRT-based characterization of electronic bond-shifts provides a rigorous criterion for judging the correctness of a proposed arrow-pushing mechanism, while also adding rich details of the multiple electronic "transitions" that may accompany a chemical transformation along the reaction pathway, even if the associated energy profile is barrierless or marked by a single maximal "transition state" feature.