Back to Search Start Over

Step Length, but Not Stepping Cadence, Strongly Predicts Physical Activity Intensity during Jogging and Running

Authors :
Pellerine, Liam P.
Petterson, Jennifer L.
Shivgulam, Madeline E.
Johansson, Peter J.
Hettiarachchi, Pasan
Kimmerly, Derek S.
Frayne, Ryan J.
O'Brien, Myles W.
Source :
Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2023 27(4):352-361.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Device-based measures often rely on the positive relationship between walking cadence and metabolic equivalents of task (METs) to estimate physical activity. It is unknown whether this relationship remains during jogging/running. The study purpose was to investigate the relationships between METs, cadence, and step length during walking and jogging/running. A treadmill protocol with 5 walking (3.2-6.4 km•hr[superscript -1]) and 5 jogging/running stages (8.0-11.3 km•hr[superscript -1]) was completed in 43 adults (23 ± 5 years, 19[female gender symbol]). Predictors of METs during walking and jogging/running were determined by generalized mixed modeling. The strongest prediction models for walking (R[superscript 2] = 0.72, P < 0.001) and jogging/running (R[superscript 2] = 0.75, P < 0.001) included cadence[superscript 2], cadence, step length, age, and leg length (all, P < 0.001). Step length accounted for 49.1% and 78.3% of model variance during walking and jogging/running, respectively. METs are poorly estimated by cadence during jogging/running but step length reduces error. Strategies to measure step length in free-living settings could better predict physical activity intensity.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1091-367X and 1532-7841
Volume :
27
Issue :
4
Database :
ERIC
Journal :
Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
EJ1398886
Document Type :
Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2023.2188118