Back to Search Start Over

The Scales for Assessing Emotional Disturbance--Third Edition: Internal Reliability, Interrater Reliability, and Test-Retest Reliability

Authors :
Huscroft-D'Angelo, Jacqueline
Wery, Jessica
Martin, Jodie Diane
Pierce, Corey
Crawford, Lindy
Source :
Behavioral Disorders. Nov 2021 47(1):28-39.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

"The Scales for Assessing Emotional Disturbance--Third Edition Rating Scale" (SAED-3 RS; Epstein et al.) is a standardized, norm-referenced measure designed to aid in the identification process by providing useful data to professionals determining eligibility of students with an emotional disturbance (ED). Three studies are reported to address the reliability of the SAED-3 RS. Study 1 investigated the internal reliability of the SAED-3 RS using data from a nationally representative sample of 1,430 students and 441 with ED. Study 2 examined interrater reliability between 123 pairs of educators who had worked with the student for at least 2 months. Study 3 assessed the test-retest reliability over a 2-week period to determine stability of the SAED-3 RS. Across all studies, scores collected from the SAED-3 RS were determined to be a reliable, stable for measuring the emotional and behavioral functioning of students. Specifically, the averaged coefficient alpha for internal consistency ranged from 0.79 to 0.92 for each subscale and 0.96 for the composite score; interrater reliability coefficients ranged from 0.77 to 0.89 for each subscale and .89 for the composite score, and test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.79 to 0.92 for each subscale and 0.96 for the composite score. Limitations, future research and implications for use of the SAED-3 RS are discussed.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0198-7429
Volume :
47
Issue :
1
Database :
ERIC
Journal :
Behavioral Disorders
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
EJ1313782
Document Type :
Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742920969152