Cite
Differences Between Teachers' Attitudinal Self-Ratings and Their Principals' Teacher Ideal on a Mathematics Inventory. Research Paper No. 14.
MLA
Minnesota Univ., Minneapolis.Coll.of Education., and Thomas R. Post. Differences Between Teachers’ Attitudinal Self-Ratings and Their Principals’ Teacher Ideal on a Mathematics Inventory. Research Paper No. 14. 30 Dec. 1974. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=eric&AN=ED148635&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.
APA
Minnesota Univ., M. C. of E., & Post, T. R. (1974). Differences Between Teachers’ Attitudinal Self-Ratings and Their Principals’ Teacher Ideal on a Mathematics Inventory. Research Paper No. 14.
Chicago
Minnesota Univ., Minneapolis. Coll. of Education., and Thomas R. Post. 1974. “Differences Between Teachers’ Attitudinal Self-Ratings and Their Principals’ Teacher Ideal on a Mathematics Inventory. Research Paper No. 14.” http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=eric&AN=ED148635&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.