Cite
A Critique on Standards for Evaluating Library Collections; Supplement I to Final Report: A Study of Resources and Major Subject Holdings Available in U.S. Federal Libraries Maintaining Extensive or Unique Collections of Research Materials.
MLA
George Washington Univ., Washington, DC.Biological Sciences Communication Project., et al. A Critique on Standards for Evaluating Library Collections; Supplement I to Final Report: A Study of Resources and Major Subject Holdings Available in U.S. Federal Libraries Maintaining Extensive or Unique Collections of Research Materials. Apr. 1970. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=eric&AN=ED043351&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.
APA
George Washington Univ., W. D. B. S. C. P., Benton, M., & Ottersen, S. (1970). A Critique on Standards for Evaluating Library Collections; Supplement I to Final Report: A Study of Resources and Major Subject Holdings Available in U.S. Federal Libraries Maintaining Extensive or Unique Collections of Research Materials.
Chicago
George Washington Univ., Washington, DC. Biological Sciences Communication Project., Mildr Benton, and Signe Ottersen. 1970. “A Critique on Standards for Evaluating Library Collections; Supplement I to Final Report: A Study of Resources and Major Subject Holdings Available in U.S. Federal Libraries Maintaining Extensive or Unique Collections of Research Materials,” April. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=eric&AN=ED043351&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.