Back to Search Start Over

Balancing risks and benefits of cannabis use: umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and observational studies

Authors :
Solmi, Marco
De Toffol, Marco
Kim, Jong Yeob
Choi, Min Je
Stubbs, Brendon
Thompson, Trevor
Firth, Joseph
Miola, Alessandro
Croatto, Giovanni
Baggio, Francesca
Michelon, Silvia
Ballan, Luca
Gerdle, Björn
Monaco, Francesco
Simonato, Pierluigi
Scocco, Paolo
Ricca, Valdo
Castellini, Giovanni
Fornaro, Michele
Murru, Andrea
Vieta, Eduard
Fusar-Poli, Paolo
Barbui, Corrado
Ioannidis, John P. A.
Carvalho, Andre F.
Radua, Joaquim
Correll, Christoph U.
Cortese, Samuel
Murray, Robin M.
Castle, David
Il Shin, Jae
Dragioti, Elena
Solmi, Marco
De Toffol, Marco
Kim, Jong Yeob
Choi, Min Je
Stubbs, Brendon
Thompson, Trevor
Firth, Joseph
Miola, Alessandro
Croatto, Giovanni
Baggio, Francesca
Michelon, Silvia
Ballan, Luca
Gerdle, Björn
Monaco, Francesco
Simonato, Pierluigi
Scocco, Paolo
Ricca, Valdo
Castellini, Giovanni
Fornaro, Michele
Murru, Andrea
Vieta, Eduard
Fusar-Poli, Paolo
Barbui, Corrado
Ioannidis, John P. A.
Carvalho, Andre F.
Radua, Joaquim
Correll, Christoph U.
Cortese, Samuel
Murray, Robin M.
Castle, David
Il Shin, Jae
Dragioti, Elena
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To systematically assess credibility and certainty of associations between cannabis, cannabinoids, and cannabis based medicines and human health, from observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DESIGN Umbrella review. DATA SOURCES PubMed, PsychInfo, Embase, up to 9 February 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES Systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies and RCTs that have reported on the efficacy and safety of cannabis, cannabinoids, or cannabis based medicines were included. Credibility was graded according to convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, weak, or not significant (observational evidence), and by GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) (RCTs). Quality was assessed with AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2). Sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS 101 meta-analyses were included (observational=50, RCTs=51) (AMSTAR 2 high 33, moderate 31, low 32, or critically low 5). From RCTs supported by high to moderate certainty, cannabis based medicines increased adverse events related to the central nervous system (equivalent odds ratio 2.84 (95% confidence interval 2.16 to 3.73)), psychological effects (3.07 (1.79 to 5.26)), and vision (3.00 (1.79 5.03)) in people with mixed conditions (GRADE=high), improved nausea/vomit, pain, spasticity, but increased psychiatric, gastrointestinal adverse event, and somnolence among others (GRADE=moderate). Cannabidiol improved 50% reduction of seizures (0.59 (0.38 to 0.92)) and seizure events (0.59 (0.36 to 0.96)) (GRADE=high), but increased pneumonia, gastrointestinal adverse events, and somnolence (GRADE=moderate). For chronic pain, cannabis based medicines or cannabinoids reduced pain by 30% (0.59 (0.37 to 0.93), GRADE=high), across different conditions (n=7), but increased psychological distress. For epilepsy, cannabidiol increased risk of diarrhoea (2.25 (1.33 to 3.81)), had no effect on sleep disru

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1457580227
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136.bmj-2022-072348