Back to Search Start Over

A phase Ib randomized multicenter trial of isolated hepatic perfusion in combination with ipilimumab and nivolumab for uveal melanoma metastases (SCANDIUM II trial)

Authors :
Bagge, R. Olofsson
Nelson, A.
Shafazand, A.
Cahlin, C.
Carneiro, A.
Helgadottir, H.
Levin, M.
Rizell, M.
Ullenhag, Gustav
Wiren, S.
Lindner, P.
Nilsson, J. A.
Ny, L.
Bagge, R. Olofsson
Nelson, A.
Shafazand, A.
Cahlin, C.
Carneiro, A.
Helgadottir, H.
Levin, M.
Rizell, M.
Ullenhag, Gustav
Wiren, S.
Lindner, P.
Nilsson, J. A.
Ny, L.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare malignancy where 50% of patients develop metastatic disease primarily affecting the liver. Approximately 40% of patients with metastatic UM respond to one-time isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with high -dose melphalan. This phase I trial investigates the safety and clinical ef fi cacy of IHP combined with ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO). Patients and methods: Immunotherapy-na & iuml;ve patients were randomized in this phase I trial to receive either IHP followed by IPI 3 mg/kg and NIVO 1 mg/kg (IPI3/NIVO1) for four cycles (post -operative arm), or one cycle of preoperative IPI3/NIVO1, IHP and then three cycles of IPI3/NIVO1 (pre-post-operative arm), followed by maintenance therapy with NIVO 480 mg for 1 year. Results: Eighteen patients were enrolled and randomized. Three patients did not undergo IHP as planned. In total, 11/ 18 patients (6 in the post -operative arm and 5 in the pre-post-operative arm) did not complete the planned four cycles of IPI3/NIVO1. Toxicity to IHP was similar in both groups, but the number of immune-related adverse events (AEs) was higher in the pre-post-operative arm. Among assessable patients, overall response rate was 57% in the post -operative arm (4/7) and 22% in the pre-post-operative arm (2/9). Conclusions: Combination therapy with IHP and IPI3/NIVO1 was associated with severe AEs. The efficacy of this combination is encouraging with high response rates. One cycle of preoperative IPI/NIVO before IHP did not show potential benefits in terms of safety or efficacy.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1457291318
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016.j.esmoop.2024.103623