Back to Search Start Over

Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science.

Authors :
Avissar-Whiting, Michele
Avissar-Whiting, Michele
Belliard, Frédérique
Bertozzi, Stefano
Brand, Amy
Brown, Katherine
Clément-Stoneham, Géraldine
Dawson, Stephanie
Dey, Gautam
Ecer, Daniel
Edmunds, Scott
Farley, Ashley
Fischer, Tara
Franko, Maryrose
Fraser, James
Funk, Kathryn
Ganier, Clarisse
Harrison, Melissa
Hatch, Anna
Hazlett, Haley
Hindle, Samantha
Hook, Daniel
Hurst, Phil
Kamoun, Sophien
Kiley, Robert
Lacy, Michael
LaFlamme, Marcel
Lawrence, Rebecca
Lemberger, Thomas
Leptin, Maria
Lumb, Elliott
MacCallum, Catriona
Marcum, Christopher
Marinello, Gabriele
Mendonça, Alex
Monaco, Sara
Neves, Kleber
Pattinson, Damian
Polka, Jessica
Puebla, Iratxe
Rittman, Martyn
Royle, Stephen
Saderi, Daniela
Sever, Richard
Shearer, Kathleen
Spiro, John
Stern, Bodo
Taraborelli, Dario
Vale, Ron
Vasquez, Claudia
Waltman, Ludo
Watt, Fiona
Weinberg, Zara
Williams, Mark
Avissar-Whiting, Michele
Avissar-Whiting, Michele
Belliard, Frédérique
Bertozzi, Stefano
Brand, Amy
Brown, Katherine
Clément-Stoneham, Géraldine
Dawson, Stephanie
Dey, Gautam
Ecer, Daniel
Edmunds, Scott
Farley, Ashley
Fischer, Tara
Franko, Maryrose
Fraser, James
Funk, Kathryn
Ganier, Clarisse
Harrison, Melissa
Hatch, Anna
Hazlett, Haley
Hindle, Samantha
Hook, Daniel
Hurst, Phil
Kamoun, Sophien
Kiley, Robert
Lacy, Michael
LaFlamme, Marcel
Lawrence, Rebecca
Lemberger, Thomas
Leptin, Maria
Lumb, Elliott
MacCallum, Catriona
Marcum, Christopher
Marinello, Gabriele
Mendonça, Alex
Monaco, Sara
Neves, Kleber
Pattinson, Damian
Polka, Jessica
Puebla, Iratxe
Rittman, Martyn
Royle, Stephen
Saderi, Daniela
Sever, Richard
Shearer, Kathleen
Spiro, John
Stern, Bodo
Taraborelli, Dario
Vale, Ron
Vasquez, Claudia
Waltman, Ludo
Watt, Fiona
Weinberg, Zara
Williams, Mark
Source :
PLoS Biology; vol 22, iss 2
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Peer review is an important part of the scientific process, but traditional peer review at journals is coming under increased scrutiny for its inefficiency and lack of transparency. As preprints become more widely used and accepted, they raise the possibility of rethinking the peer-review process. Preprints are enabling new forms of peer review that have the potential to be more thorough, inclusive, and collegial than traditional journal peer review, and to thus fundamentally shift the culture of peer review toward constructive collaboration. In this Consensus View, we make a call to action to stakeholders in the community to accelerate the growing momentum of preprint sharing and provide recommendations to empower researchers to provide open and constructive peer review for preprints.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
PLoS Biology; vol 22, iss 2
Notes :
application/pdf, PLoS Biology vol 22, iss 2
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1449596158
Document Type :
Electronic Resource