Back to Search Start Over

The EU Green Deal's ambition for a toxic-free environment: filling the gap for science-based policy making

Authors :
van Dijk, Joanke
Leopold, Annegaaike
Flerlage, Hannah
van Wezel, Annemarie
Seiler, Thomas-Benjamin
Enrici, Marie-Hélene
Bloor, Michelle C
van Dijk, Joanke
Leopold, Annegaaike
Flerlage, Hannah
van Wezel, Annemarie
Seiler, Thomas-Benjamin
Enrici, Marie-Hélene
Bloor, Michelle C
Source :
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management vol.17 (2021) nr.6 p.1105-1113 [ISSN 1551-3777]
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Around the world, many ambitious environmental conventions and regulations have been implemented over recent decades. Despite this, the environment is still deteriorating. An increase in the volume and diversity of chemicals is one of the main drivers of this deterioration, of which biodiversity loss is a telling indicator. In response to this situation, in October 2020, a chemicals strategy for sustainability (CSS) was published in the EU. The CSS is the first regional framework aiming to address chemical pollution in a holistic manner. The CSS covers the complete lifecycle of a chemical, including the design of better substances and remediation options, to remove chemicals from the environment. The strategy contains terms, such as a “toxic-free environment,” for which no clear definition exists, potentially hampering the implementation of the CSS. In this paper, a definition for a “toxic-free environment” is proposed on the basis of a survey and a discussion held at the 2020 SETAC Europe Annual Meeting. In addition, key issues that are absent from the CSS but are considered to be key for the realization of a toxic-free environment are identified. To achieve the policy goals, it is recommended to align the definition of risk across the different chemical legislations, to establish a platform for open data and data sharing, and to increase the utility and use of novel scientific findings in policymaking, through the development of a strong science to regulation feedback mechanism and vice versa. The paper concludes that environmental scientists have the tools to address the key challenges presented in the CSS. However, an extra step is needed by both policymakers and scientists to develop methods, processes and tools, to increase the robustness and transparency of deliberation processes, and the utility of science. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2021;17:1105–1113.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management vol.17 (2021) nr.6 p.1105-1113 [ISSN 1551-3777]
Notes :
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4429, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1445818847
Document Type :
Electronic Resource