Back to Search Start Over

Selective determination of 2-aminobenzothiazole in environmental water and organic extracts from fish and dust samples

Authors :
Química Analítica i Química Orgànica
Universitat Rovira i Virgili
Moral A; Borrull F; Furton KG; Kabir A; Fontanals N; Marcé RM
Química Analítica i Química Orgànica
Universitat Rovira i Virgili
Moral A; Borrull F; Furton KG; Kabir A; Fontanals N; Marcé RM
Source :
Analytical And Bioanalytical Chemistry; 10.1007/s00216-023-05035-5; Analytical And Bioanalytical Chemistry. 416 (2): 439-448
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

In the present study, a homemade mixed-mode ion-exchange sorbent based on silica with embedded graphene microparticles is applied for the selective extraction of 2-aminobenzothiazole (NH2BT) followed by determination through liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry. The sorbent was evaluated for the solid-phase extraction of NH2BT from environmental water samples (river, effluent wastewater, and influent wastewater), and NH2BT was strongly retained through the selective cation-exchange interactions. Therefore, the inclusion of a clean-up step of 7 mL of methanol provided good selectivity for the extraction of NH2BT. The apparent recoveries obtained for environmental water samples ranged from 62 to 69% and the matrix effect from -1 to -14%. The sorbent was also evaluated in the clean-up step of the organic extract for the extraction of NH2BT from organic extracts of indoor dust samples (10 mL of ethyl acetate from pressurized liquid extraction) and fish (10 mL of acetonitrile from QuEChERS extraction). The organic extracts were acidified (adding a 0.1% of formic acid) to promote the cation-exchange interactions between the sorbent and the analyte. The apparent recoveries for fish samples ranged from 22 to 36% depending on the species. In the case of indoor dust samples, the recovery was 41%. It should be highlighted the low matrix effect encountered in such complex samples, with values ranging from -7 to 5% for fish and dust samples. Finally, various samples were analyzed. The concentration in river samples ranged from 31 to 136 ng/L; in effluent wastewater samples, from 55 to 191 ng/L; in influent wastewater samples, from 131 to 549 ng/L; in fish samples, from 14 to 57 ng/g dried weight; and in indoor dust samples, from <MQL to 114 ng/g.© 2023.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Analytical And Bioanalytical Chemistry; 10.1007/s00216-023-05035-5; Analytical And Bioanalytical Chemistry. 416 (2): 439-448
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1443597526
Document Type :
Electronic Resource