Back to Search Start Over

“It’s Not so Easy to Measure impact”: A Qualitative Analysis of How Universities Measure and Evaluate Their Communication

Authors :
Sörensen, Isabel; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1094-6794
Volk, Sophia Charlotte; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0887-8224
Fürst, Silke; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1978-4277
Vogler, Daniel; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0211-7574
Schäfer, Mike S; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0847-7503
Sörensen, Isabel; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1094-6794
Volk, Sophia Charlotte; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0887-8224
Fürst, Silke; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1978-4277
Vogler, Daniel; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0211-7574
Schäfer, Mike S; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0847-7503
Source :
Sörensen, Isabel; Volk, Sophia Charlotte; Fürst, Silke; Vogler, Daniel; Schäfer, Mike S (2024). “It’s Not so Easy to Measure impact”: A Qualitative Analysis of How Universities Measure and Evaluate Their Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 18(2):93-114.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Universities are key actors at the intersection of science and society and their strategic communication and its effective implementation is essential, as is the measurement and evaluation (M&E) of its impact. Despite the growing relevance of M&E in university communication, however, empirical studies on the subject are rare. Therefore, this study explores M&E practices of central communication departments at Swiss universities through semi-structured interviews and document analysis. Findings show that M&E are still in its infancy at most universities. The study identifies resources and skills of communication professionals, digital technologies as well as a culture of learning as the primary factors enabling or constraining M&E. Findings show that the organizational context, notably the (perceived) degree of competition, the availability of personnel resources, and the professionalism of the communication department, rather than the sector of higher education itself, influences M&E practices. In addition to resources, our findings point to an engaged leadership actively supporting a culture of learning and the further development of skills in communication departments as the most important factor for M&E practices.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Sörensen, Isabel; Volk, Sophia Charlotte; Fürst, Silke; Vogler, Daniel; Schäfer, Mike S (2024). “It’s Not so Easy to Measure impact”: A Qualitative Analysis of How Universities Measure and Evaluate Their Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 18(2):93-114.
Notes :
application/pdf, info:doi/10.5167/uzh-260234, English, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1443059427
Document Type :
Electronic Resource