Back to Search Start Over

Importance of different electronic medical record components for chronic disease identification in a Swiss primary care database: a cross-sectional study

Authors :
Meier, Rahel
Grischott, Thomas
Rachamin, Yael
Jäger, Levy
Senn, Oliver
Rosemann, Thomas
Burgstaller, Jakob M
Markun, Stefan
Meier, Rahel
Grischott, Thomas
Rachamin, Yael
Jäger, Levy
Senn, Oliver
Rosemann, Thomas
Burgstaller, Jakob M
Markun, Stefan
Source :
Meier, Rahel; Grischott, Thomas; Rachamin, Yael; Jäger, Levy; Senn, Oliver; Rosemann, Thomas; Burgstaller, Jakob M; Markun, Stefan (2023). Importance of different electronic medical record components for chronic disease identification in a Swiss primary care database: a cross-sectional study. Swiss Medical Weekly, 153:40107.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

BACKGROUND Primary care databases collect electronic medical records with routine data from primary care patients. The identification of chronic diseases in primary care databases often integrates information from various electronic medical record components (EMR-Cs) used by primary care providers. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of selected chronic conditions using a large Swiss primary care database and to examine the importance of different EMR-Cs for case identification. METHODS Cross-sectional study with 120,608 patients of 128 general practitioners in the Swiss FIRE ("Family Medicine Research using Electronic Medical Records") primary care database in 2019. Sufficient criteria on three individual EMR-Cs, namely medication, clinical or laboratory parameters and reasons for encounters, were combined by logical disjunction into definitions of 49 chronic conditions; then prevalence estimates and measures of importance of the individual EMR-Cs for case identification were calculated. RESULTS A total of 185,535 cases (i.e. patients with a specific chronic condition) were identified. Prevalence estimates were 27.5% (95% CI: 27.3-27.8%) for hypertension, 13.5% (13.3-13.7%) for dyslipidaemia and 6.6% (6.4-6.7%) for diabetes mellitus. Of all cases, 87.1% (87.0-87.3%) were identified via medication, 22.1% (21.9-22.3%) via clinical or laboratory parameters and 19.3% (19.1-19.5%) via reasons for encounters. The majority (65.4%) of cases were identifiable solely through medication. Of the two other EMR-Cs, clinical or laboratory parameters was most important for identifying cases of chronic kidney disease, anorexia/bulimia nervosa and obesity whereas reasons for encounters was crucial for identifying many low-prevalence diseases as well as cancer, heart disease and osteoarthritis. CONCLUSIONS The EMR-C medication was most important for chronic disease identification overall, but identification varied strongly by disease. The analysis of the importance of differe

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Meier, Rahel; Grischott, Thomas; Rachamin, Yael; Jäger, Levy; Senn, Oliver; Rosemann, Thomas; Burgstaller, Jakob M; Markun, Stefan (2023). Importance of different electronic medical record components for chronic disease identification in a Swiss primary care database: a cross-sectional study. Swiss Medical Weekly, 153:40107.
Notes :
application/pdf, info:doi/10.5167/uzh-238180, English, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1443054413
Document Type :
Electronic Resource