Back to Search
Start Over
Is heart failure misdiagnosed in hospitalized patients with preserved ejection fraction? From the European Society of Cardiology - Heart Failure Association EURObservational Research Programme Heart Failure Long-Term Registry
- Source :
- Kapłon-Cieślicka, Agnieszka; Laroche, Cécile; Crespo-Leiro, Maria G; Coats, Andrew J S; Anker, Stefan D; Filippatos, Gerasimos; Maggioni, Aldo P; Hage, Camilla; Lara-Padrón, Antonio; Fucili, Alessandro; Drożdż, Jarosław; Seferovic, Petar; Rosano, Giuseppe M C; Mebazaa, Alexandre; McDonagh, Theresa; Lainscak, Mitja; Ruschitzka, Frank; Lund, Lars H (2020). Is heart failure misdiagnosed in hospitalized patients with preserved ejection fraction? From the European Society of Cardiology - Heart Failure Association EURObservational Research Programme Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. ESC Heart Failure, 7(5):2098-2112.
- Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- AIMS In hospitalized patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), the aims of this study were (i) to assess the proportion meeting the 2016 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) HFpEF criteria and (ii) to compare patients with restrictive/pseudonormal mitral inflow pattern (MIP) vs. patients with MIP other than restrictive/pseudonormal. METHODS AND RESULTS We included hospitalized participants of the ESC-Heart Failure Association (HFA) EURObservational Research Programme (EORP) HF Long-Term Registry who had echocardiogram with ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50% during index hospitalization. As no data on e', E/e' and left ventricular (LV) mass index were gathered in the registry, the 2016 ESC HFpEF definition was modified as follows: elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) (≥100 pg/mL for acute HF) and/or N-terminal pro-BNP (≥300 pg/mL) and at least one of the echocardiographic criteria: (i) presence of LV hypertrophy (yes/no), (ii) left atrial volume index (LAVI) of >34 mL/m$^{2}$ ), or (iii) restrictive/pseudonormal MIP. Next, all patients were divided into four groups: (i) patients with restrictive/pseudonormal MIP on echocardiography [i.e. with presumably elevated left atrial (LA) pressure], (ii) patients with MIP other than restrictive/pseudonormal (i.e. with presumably normal LA pressure), (iii) atrial fibrillation (AF) group, and (iv) 'grey area' (no consistent description of MIP despite no report of AF). Of 6365 hospitalized patients, 1848 (29%) had EF ≥ 50%. Natriuretic peptides were assessed in 28%, LV hypertrophy in 92%, LAVI in 13%, and MIP in 67%. The 2016 ESC HFpEF criteria could be assessed in 27% of the 1848 patients and, if assessed, were met in 52%. Of the 1848 patients, 19% had restrictive/pseudonormal MIP, 43% had MIP other than restrictive/pseudonormal, 18% had AF and 20% were grey area. There were no differences in long-term all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, or all-cause hospitalizatio
Details
- Database :
- OAIster
- Journal :
- Kapłon-Cieślicka, Agnieszka; Laroche, Cécile; Crespo-Leiro, Maria G; Coats, Andrew J S; Anker, Stefan D; Filippatos, Gerasimos; Maggioni, Aldo P; Hage, Camilla; Lara-Padrón, Antonio; Fucili, Alessandro; Drożdż, Jarosław; Seferovic, Petar; Rosano, Giuseppe M C; Mebazaa, Alexandre; McDonagh, Theresa; Lainscak, Mitja; Ruschitzka, Frank; Lund, Lars H (2020). Is heart failure misdiagnosed in hospitalized patients with preserved ejection fraction? From the European Society of Cardiology - Heart Failure Association EURObservational Research Programme Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. ESC Heart Failure, 7(5):2098-2112.
- Notes :
- application/pdf, info:doi/10.5167/uzh-201095, English
- Publication Type :
- Electronic Resource
- Accession number :
- edsoai.on1443037131
- Document Type :
- Electronic Resource