Risk of haematologic cancers among individuals tested for Borrelia burgdorferi antibodies, and Borrelia burgdorferi seropositive individuals:a nationwide population-based matched cohort study

Objectives In a nationwide, matched cohort study, we aimed to investigate risks of haematologic cancers among individuals tested for Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) antibodies, and among serum Bb seropositive individuals. Methods We identified all Bb seropositive individuals in Denmark (1993–2020) (n = 52 200) and constructed two age- and sex-matched comparison cohorts: (a) Bb seronegative controls (n = 104 400) and (b) background population controls (n = 261 000). We calculated short-term OR (aOR) (<1 month of study inclusion), and long-term hazard ratios (aHR) (>1 month after study inclusion) adjusted for age and sex. We stratified seropositive individuals on only Bb-IgM seropositive (n = 26 103), only Bb-IgG seropositive (n = 18 698), and Bb-IgM-and-IgG seropositive (n = 7399). Results Compared with the background population, individuals tested for Bb antibodies had increased short-term (aOR: 12.6, 95% CI: 10.1–15.6) and long-term (aHR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.2–1.4) risk of haematologic cancers. The Bb seropositive individuals had no increased risk of haematologic cancers compared with those who tested negative for Bb, except that Bb-IgM-and-IgG seropositive individuals had increased long-term risk of chronic lymphatic leukaemia (aHR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.2–3.4). Discussion Our results suggest that Bb antibody testing is included in the work-up of unspecific symptoms preceding diagnosis of haematologic cancers. Bb-IgM-and-IgG seropositivity was associated with a two-fold increased long-term risk of chronic lymphatic leukaemia, which warrants further investigation.
Objectives: In a nationwide, matched cohort study, we aimed to investigate risks of haematologic cancers among individuals tested for Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) antibodies, and among serum Bb seropositive individuals. Methods: We identified all Bb seropositive individuals in Denmark (1993–2020) (n = 52 200) and constructed two age- and sex-matched comparison cohorts: (a) Bb seronegative controls (n = 104 400) and (b) background population controls (n = 261 000). We calculated short-term OR (aOR) (<1 month of study inclusion), and long-term hazard ratios (aHR) (>1 month after study inclusion) adjusted for age and sex. We stratified seropositive individuals on only Bb-IgM seropositive (n = 26 103), only Bb-IgG seropositive (n = 18 698), and Bb-IgM-and-IgG seropositive (n = 7399). Results: Compared with the background population, individuals tested for Bb antibodies had increased short-term (aOR: 12.6, 95% CI: 10.1–15.6) and long-term (aHR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.2–1.4) risk of haematologic cancers. The Bb seropositive individuals had no increased risk of haematologic cancers compared with those who tested negative for Bb, except that Bb-IgM-and-IgG seropositive individuals had increased long-term risk of chronic lymphatic leukaemia (aHR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.2–3.4). Discussion: Our results suggest that Bb antibody testing is included in the work-up of unspecific symptoms preceding diagnosis of haematologic cancers. Bb-IgM-and-IgG seropositivity was associated with a two-fold increased long-term risk of chronic lymphatic leukaemia, which warrants further investigation.