Back to Search Start Over

Feedback loops drive ecological succession : towards a unified conceptual framework

Authors :
van Breugel, Michiel
Bongers, Frans
Norden, Natalia
Meave, Jorge
Amissah, Lucy
Chanthorn, Wirong
Chazdon, Robin
Craven, Dylan
Farrior, Caroline
Hall, Jefferson S.
Hérault, Bruno
Jakovac, Catarina
Lebrija-Trejos, Edwin
Martínez-Ramos, Miguel
Muñoz, Rodrigo
Poorter, Lourens
Rüger, Nadja
van der Sande, Masha
Dent, Daisy
van Breugel, Michiel
Bongers, Frans
Norden, Natalia
Meave, Jorge
Amissah, Lucy
Chanthorn, Wirong
Chazdon, Robin
Craven, Dylan
Farrior, Caroline
Hall, Jefferson S.
Hérault, Bruno
Jakovac, Catarina
Lebrija-Trejos, Edwin
Martínez-Ramos, Miguel
Muñoz, Rodrigo
Poorter, Lourens
Rüger, Nadja
van der Sande, Masha
Dent, Daisy
Source :
ISSN: 1464-7931
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

The core principle shared by most theories and models of succession is that, following a major disturbance, plant–environment feedback dynamics drive a directional change in the plant community. The most commonly studied feedback loops are those in which the regrowth of the plant community causes changes to the abiotic (e.g. soil nutrients) or biotic (e.g. dispersers) environment, which differentially affect species availability or performance. This, in turn, leads to shifts in the species composition of the plant community. However, there are many other PE feedback loops that potentially drive succession, each of which can be considered a model of succession. While plant–environment feedback loops in principle generate predictable successional trajectories, succession is generally observed to be highly variable. Factors contributing to this variability are the stochastic processes involved in feedback dynamics, such as individual mortality and seed dispersal, and extrinsic causes of succession, which are not affected by changes in the plant community but do affect species performance or availability. Both can lead to variation in the identity of dominant species within communities. This, in turn, leads to further contingencies if these species differ in their effect on their environment (priority effects). Predictability and variability are thus intrinsically linked features of ecological succession. We present a new conceptual framework of ecological succession that integrates the propositions discussed above. This framework defines seven general causes: landscape context, disturbance and land-use, biotic factors, abiotic factors, species availability, species performance, and the plant community. When involved in a feedback loop, these general causes drive succession and when not, they are extrinsic causes that create variability in successional trajectories and dynamics. The proposed framework provides a guide for linking these general causes into causal pathway

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
ISSN: 1464-7931
Notes :
application/pdf, Biological Reviews 99 (2024) 3, ISSN: 1464-7931, ISSN: 1464-7931, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1430715449
Document Type :
Electronic Resource