Back to Search Start Over

Climate regulation processes are linked to the functional composition of plant communities in European forests, shrublands, and grasslands

Authors :
Kambach, Stephan
Attorre, Fabio
Axmanová, Irena
Bergamini, Ariel
Biurrun, Idoia
Bonari, Gianmaria
Carranza, Maria Laura
Chiarucci, Alessandro
Chytrý, Milan
Dengler, Jürgen
Garbolino, Emmanuel
Golub, Valentin
Hickler, Thomas
Jandt, Ute
Jansen, Jan
Jiménez-Alfaro, Borja
Karger, Dirk Nikolaus
Lososová, Zdeňka
Rašomavičius, Valerijus
Rūsiņa, Solvita
Sieber, Petra
Stanisci, Angela
Thuiller, Wilfried
Welk, Erik
Zimmermann, Niklaus E.
Bruelheide, Helge
Kambach, Stephan
Attorre, Fabio
Axmanová, Irena
Bergamini, Ariel
Biurrun, Idoia
Bonari, Gianmaria
Carranza, Maria Laura
Chiarucci, Alessandro
Chytrý, Milan
Dengler, Jürgen
Garbolino, Emmanuel
Golub, Valentin
Hickler, Thomas
Jandt, Ute
Jansen, Jan
Jiménez-Alfaro, Borja
Karger, Dirk Nikolaus
Lososová, Zdeňka
Rašomavičius, Valerijus
Rūsiņa, Solvita
Sieber, Petra
Stanisci, Angela
Thuiller, Wilfried
Welk, Erik
Zimmermann, Niklaus E.
Bruelheide, Helge
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Terrestrial ecosystems affect climate by reflecting solar irradiation, evaporative cooling, and carbon sequestration. Yet very little is known about how plant traits affect climate regulation processes (CRPs) in different habitat types. Here, we used linear and random forest models to relate the community-weighted mean and variance values of 19 plant traits (summarized into eight trait axes) to the climate-adjusted proportion of reflected solar irradiation, evapotranspiration, and net primary productivity across 36,630 grid cells at the European extent, classified into 10 types of forest, shrubland, and grassland habitats. We found that these trait axes were more tightly linked to log evapotranspiration (with an average of 6.2% explained variation) and the proportion of reflected solar irradiation (6.1%) than to net primary productivity (4.9%). The highest variation in CRPs was explained in forest and temperate shrubland habitats. Yet, the strength and direction of these relationships were strongly habitat-dependent. We conclude that any spatial upscaling of the effects of plant communities on CRPs must consider the relative contribution of different habitat types.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, Global Change Biology, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1430686889
Document Type :
Electronic Resource