Back to Search Start Over

The Implementation in Context (ICON) Framework: A meta-framework of context domains, attributes and features in healthcare

Authors :
Squires, Janet E.
Graham, Ian D.
Santos, Wilmer J.
Hutchinson, Alison M.
Backman, Chantal
Bergström, Anna
Brehaut, Jamie
Brouwers, Melissa
Burton, Christopher
de Candido, Ligyana Korki
Cassidy, Christine
Chalmers, Cheyne
Chapman, Anna
Colquhoun, Heather
Curran, Janet
Varin, Melissa Demery
Doering, Paula
Rose, Annette Elliott
Fairclough, Lee
Francis, Jillian
Godfrey, Christina
Greenough, Megan
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Grinspun, Doris
Harvey, Gillian
Hillmer, Michael
Ivers, Noah
Lavis, John
Li, Shelly-Anne
Michie, Susan
Miller, Wayne
Noseworthy, Thomas
Rader, Tamara
Robson, Mark
Rycroft-Malone, Jo
Stacey, Dawn
Straus, Sharon
Tricco, Andrea C.
Wallin, Lars
Watkins, Vanessa
Squires, Janet E.
Graham, Ian D.
Santos, Wilmer J.
Hutchinson, Alison M.
Backman, Chantal
Bergström, Anna
Brehaut, Jamie
Brouwers, Melissa
Burton, Christopher
de Candido, Ligyana Korki
Cassidy, Christine
Chalmers, Cheyne
Chapman, Anna
Colquhoun, Heather
Curran, Janet
Varin, Melissa Demery
Doering, Paula
Rose, Annette Elliott
Fairclough, Lee
Francis, Jillian
Godfrey, Christina
Greenough, Megan
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Grinspun, Doris
Harvey, Gillian
Hillmer, Michael
Ivers, Noah
Lavis, John
Li, Shelly-Anne
Michie, Susan
Miller, Wayne
Noseworthy, Thomas
Rader, Tamara
Robson, Mark
Rycroft-Malone, Jo
Stacey, Dawn
Straus, Sharon
Tricco, Andrea C.
Wallin, Lars
Watkins, Vanessa
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background There is growing evidence that context mediates the effects of implementation interventions intended to increase healthcare professionals’ use of research evidence in clinical practice. However, conceptual clarity about what comprises context is elusive. The purpose of this study was to advance conceptual clarity on context by developing the Implementation in Context Framework, a meta-framework of the context domains, attributes and features that can facilitate or hinder healthcare professionals’ use of research evidence and the effectiveness of implementation interventions in clinical practice. Methods We conducted a meta-synthesis of data from three interrelated studies: (1) a concept analysis of published literature on context (n = 70 studies), (2) a secondary analysis of healthcare professional interviews (n = 145) examining context across 11 unique studies and (3) a descriptive qualitative study comprised of interviews with heath system stakeholders (n = 39) in four countries to elicit their tacit knowledge on the attributes and features of context. A rigorous protocol was followed for the meta-synthesis, resulting in development of the Implementation in Context Framework. Following this meta-synthesis, the framework was further refined through feedback from experts in context and implementation science. Results In the Implementation in Context Framework, context is conceptualized in three levels: micro (individual), meso (organizational), and macro (external). The three levels are composed of six contextual domains: (1) actors (micro), (2) organizational climate and structures (meso), (3) organizational social behaviour (meso), (4) organizational response to change (meso), (5) organizational processes (meso) and (6) external influences (macro). These six domains contain 22 core attributes of context and 108 features that illustrate these attributes. Conclusions The Implementation in Context Framework is the only meta-framework of context available t

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1428112167
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186.s12961-023-01028-z