Back to Search
Start Over
Screening Performance of S100 Calcium-Binding Protein B, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase L1 for Intracranial Injury Within Six Hours of Injury and Beyond
- Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- INTRODUCTION: The Scandinavian NeuroTrauma Committee (SNC) guidelines recommend S100B as a screening tool for early detection of Traumatic brain injury (TBI) in patients presenting with an initial Glasgow coma scale (GCS) of 14-15. The objective of the current study was to compare S100B's diagnostic performance within the recommended 6-hour window after injury, compared to GFAP and UCH-L1. The secondary outcome of interest was the ability of these biomarkers in detecting traumatic intracranial pathology beyond the 6-hour mark. METHODS: The Center-TBI core database (2014-2017) was queried for data pertaining to all TBI patients with an initial GCS of 14-15 who had a blood sample taken within 6 hours of injury in which the levels of S100B, GFAP, and UCH-L1 were measured. As a subgroup analysis, data involving patients with blood samples taken within 6-9 hours, and 9-12 hours were analyzed separately for diagnostic ability. The diagnostic ability of these biomarkers for detecting any intracranial injury was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Each biomarker's sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were also reported at the cutoff that maximized Youden's index. RESULTS: A total of 531 TBI patients with GCS 14-15 on admission had a blood sample taken within 6 hours, of whom 24.9% (N = 132) had radiologically confirmed intracranial injury. The AUCs of GFAP (0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-0.90) and UCH-L1 (0.81, 95% CI: 0.76-0.85) were statistically significantly higher than that of S100B (0.74, 95% CI: 0.69-0.79) during this time. There was no statistically significant difference in the predictive ability of S100B when sampled within 6 hours, 6-9 hours, and 9-12 hours of injury, as the p-values were >0.05 when comparing the AUCs. Overlapping AUC 95% CI suggests no benefit of a combined GFAP and UCH-L1 screening tool over GFAP during the time periods studied [ 0.87 (0.83-0.90) vs 0.86 (0.82-0.90) when sampled wi<br />The research leading to these results was supported by the European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no 602150 (CENTER-TBI). Additional funding was obtained from the Hannelore Kohl Stiftung (Germany), from One Mind(USA), Integra Life Sciences (USA), and Neuro Trauma Sciences (US) and, Stroke for bundet, (SE).
Details
- Database :
- OAIster
- Notes :
- English
- Publication Type :
- Electronic Resource
- Accession number :
- edsoai.on1416064019
- Document Type :
- Electronic Resource
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1089.neu.2023.0322