Corrigendum to 'The costs, health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of interventions for the prevention and treatment of incontinence-associated dermatitis: A systematic review' [Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 129 (2022) 104216].

In the supplementary material to this paper we noted some errors in supplementary Online Resource 4: (a) The title ‘CHEERS checklist’ should be deleted and replaced with ‘CHEERS checklist and adapted scoring criteria’. (b) We should have cited the following two references: Lynch et al., 2019 and Husereau et al., 2013 in the title: • D. Husereau, M. Drummond, S. Petrou, C. Carswell, D. Moher, D. Greenberg, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)–explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines good reporting practices task force. Value in Health, 16 (2) (2013), pp. 231-250 • M. Lynch, R. De Abreu Lourenco, M. Flattery, M. Haas. Reviewing the cost-effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods in an Australian context. Aust. N. Zeal. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 59 (2019), pp. 21-35 (c) In Row 7 (Comparators), the example offered ‘e.g. IUS is used rather than LNG-IUS20 or Mirena’ should be disregarded because ‘LNG-IUS20 or Mirena’ was included in error and was not relevant to this paper. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.