Back to Search
Start Over
Final environmental impact statement: Proposed barracks numbers 098, 119, and 124, Presidio of San Francisco, California
- Source :
- 87-0173F.pdf
- Publication Year :
- 1987
-
Abstract
- FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Proposed BarracksNumbers 098, 119, and 124 Presidio of San Francisco, California JUNE 1987 U.S. ArmyPresidio of San Francisco US Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento DistrictFINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT HEADQUARTERS PRESIDIO OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94129 PROPOSED BARRACKS NUMBERS 098,119,AND 124, PRESIDIO OF SAN FRANCISCO PREPARED BY: SACRAMENTO DISTRICT, CORPS of ENGINEERSforHEADQUARTERS, PRESIDIO OF SAN FRANCISCO APPROVAL RECOMMENDED BY:CLIFFORD N. GOFFCOLONEL, U.S. ARMYDIRECTOR, ENGINEERING and HOUSING PRESIDIO OF SAN FRANCISCO DATE APPROVED BY:JOSEPH V. RAFFERTY COLONEL, U.S.ARMY COMMANDING PRESIDIO Of SAN FRANCISCO DATEFINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT LEAD AGENCY - Headquarters, Presidio of San Francisco TITLE OF PROPOSED ACTION AND AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Proposed barracks Numbers 098, 119, and 124 Presidio of SanFrancisco, California ABSTRACT This report documents the environmental impacts of the development of three barracks projects proposed for construction within the Main Post area of the Presidio. Facilities would be provided for housing approximately 600 bachelor enlisted personnel and for dining, supply and operations facilities required to support these soldiers. The 098 barracks project would contain 10 barracks modules for 313 persons, a dining facility , and two administrative buildings. The 119 project would consist of two barracks (8 modules) for 167 persons; these would be •medical staff who would dine at the Letterman Army Medical Complex. Design of the 124 barracks project was recently initiated. It would be one barracks (5 modules) building for 120 persons and these soldiers would utilize the dining facilities planned as part of the 098 project. These new barracks would replace present older barracks facilities that are Inadequate, contain life-safety hazards, do not meet current seismic standards, and are difficult and expensive to operate and maintain. Alternatives of no action, rehabilitat
Details
- Database :
- OAIster
- Journal :
- 87-0173F.pdf
- Notes :
- Project Management Reports, San Francisco District, United States. Army. Corps of Engineers. San Francisco District, California, Presidio of San Francisco (Calif.), pdf, English
- Publication Type :
- Electronic Resource
- Accession number :
- edsoai.on1409803010
- Document Type :
- Electronic Resource