Back to Search Start Over

Large scale organisational intervention to improve patient safety in four UK hospitals:mixed method evaluation

Authors :
Benning, Amirta
Ghaleb, Maisoon
Suokas, Anu
Dixon-Woods, Mary
Dawson, Jeremy
Barber, Nick
Franklin, Bryony D.
Girling, Alan
Hemming, Karla
Carmalt, Martin
Rudge, Gavin
Naicker, Thirumalai
Nwulu, Ugochi
Choudhury, Sopna
Lilford, Richard
Benning, Amirta
Ghaleb, Maisoon
Suokas, Anu
Dixon-Woods, Mary
Dawson, Jeremy
Barber, Nick
Franklin, Bryony D.
Girling, Alan
Hemming, Karla
Carmalt, Martin
Rudge, Gavin
Naicker, Thirumalai
Nwulu, Ugochi
Choudhury, Sopna
Lilford, Richard
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Objectives: To conduct an independent evaluation of the first phase of the Health Foundation's Safer Patients Initiative (SPI), and to identify the net additional effect of SPI and any differences in changes in participating and non-participating NHS hospitals. Design: Mixed method evaluation involving five substudies, before and after design. Setting: NHS hospitals in United Kingdom. Participants: Four hospitals (one in each country in the UK) participating in the first phase of the SPI (SPI1); 18 control hospitals. Intervention: The SPI1 was a compound (multicomponent) organisational intervention delivered over 18 months that focused on improving the reliability of specific frontline care processes in designated clinical specialties and promoting organisational and cultural change. Results: Senior staff members were knowledgeable and enthusiastic about SPI1. There was a small (0.08 points on a 5 point scale) but significant (P<0.01) effect in favour of the SPI1 hospitals in one of 11 dimensions of the staff questionnaire (organisational climate). Qualitative evidence showed only modest penetration of SPI1 at medical ward level. Although SPI1 was designed to engage staff from the bottom up, it did not usually feel like this to those working on the wards, and questions about legitimacy of some aspects of SPI1 were raised. Of the five components to identify patients at risk of deterioration - monitoring of vital signs (14 items); routine tests (three items); evidence based standards specific to certain diseases (three items); prescribing errors (multiple items from the British National Formulary); and medical history taking (11 items) - there was little net difference between control and SPI1 hospitals, except in relation to quality of monitoring of acute medical patients, which improved on average over time across all hospitals. Recording of respiratory rate increased to a greater degree in SPI1 than in control hospitals; in the second six hours after admission reco

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1406109879
Document Type :
Electronic Resource