Multi-parameter Optimization of Gamma Emission Tomography Instruments for Irradiated Nuclear Fuel Examination

Material test reactors have an extended use in irradiation testing of novel nuclear fuel materials and the fuel behavior in off-normal conditions. The performance of the nuclear fuel is examined in in-pile and out-of-pile post-irradiation examinations (PIEs), e.g., using Gamma Emission Tomography (GET). GET is a nondestructive assay that images the internal spatial distribution of gamma-emitting nuclides built up in the fuel due to irradiation. Since GET can be performed close to the reactor and without intrusion in the fuel object, it can potentially speed up the data generation from PIE in irradiation testing. The performance metrics of GET devices can be identified regarding time requirements, noise in the reconstructed image, signal-to-background ratio, and spatial resolution. However, these are complicated to determine, partly due to inherent trade-offs between the metrics themselves, partly because they depend on the fuel activity and its spectrum (i.e., object dependent), and, finally, on the GET setup and its configuration. This work proposes a structured methodology for optimizing the collimator design for a new generation of GET tomography setups, intending to improve spatial resolution by one order of magnitude: from the millimeter scale to the hundred-micron scale. The conflicting performance metrics are determined based on the controllable parameters of the GET setup and the uncontrollable parameters of an anticipated fuel object, able to provide a signal-to-background ratio above 100. The trade-off between the performance remaining metrics is then visualized by a Pareto approach, where dominated solutions are rejected. Finally, constraints on noise level and measurement time are used to find the optimal spatial resolution. Two GET setups are presented using the outlined method. Firstly, to upgrade the tomography test bench BETTAN at Uppsala University, a new segmented HPGe detector was planned to be tested using low-activity fuel rod mock-ups. Second