Back to Search Start Over

Benefit Versus Risk Assessment of Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma:Analyses From Longer Follow-up of the OCEAN and HORIZON Studies

Authors :
Sonneveld, Pieter
Richardson, Paul G.
Ludwig, Heinz
Dimopoulos, Meletios Athanasios
Schjesvold, Fredrik H.
Hájek, Roman
Abdulhaq, Haifaa
Thuresson, Marcus
Norin, Stefan
Bakker, Nicolaas A.
Mateos, Maria Victoria
Sonneveld, Pieter
Richardson, Paul G.
Ludwig, Heinz
Dimopoulos, Meletios Athanasios
Schjesvold, Fredrik H.
Hájek, Roman
Abdulhaq, Haifaa
Thuresson, Marcus
Norin, Stefan
Bakker, Nicolaas A.
Mateos, Maria Victoria
Source :
Sonneveld , P , Richardson , P G , Ludwig , H , Dimopoulos , M A , Schjesvold , F H , Hájek , R , Abdulhaq , H , Thuresson , M , Norin , S , Bakker , N A & Mateos , M V 2023 , ' Benefit Versus Risk Assessment of Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma : Analyses From Longer Follow-up of the OCEAN and HORIZON Studies ' , Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia , vol. 23 , no. 9 , pp. 687-696 .
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Introduction: Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) but directionally different overall survival (OS) favoring pomalidomide (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10) in OCEAN. Methods: These analyses further investigated prognostic subgroups impacting survival in updated data from the randomized, phase 3 OCEAN study (NCT03151811; date: February 3, 2022) and the phase 2 HORIZON study (NCT02963493; date: February 2, 2022). Results: In OCEAN, subgroups prognostic for OS were age (P = .011; <65 years favored pomalidomide) and no previous autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or progression >36 months after ASCT (P = .001; favored melflufen). Overall, 245 of 495 (49%) patients randomized had received a previous ASCT, of which 202 (82%) had progressed within 36 months following their ASCT. When excluding patients who had progressed <36 months post-ASCT (melflufen group, n = 145; pomalidomide group, n = 148), median OS was 23.6 months with melflufen and 19.8 months with pomalidomide (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.62-1.12]; P = .22). Among patients with triple-class refractory disease in HORIZON, patients who had progressed <36 months post-ASCT (n = 58) had a lower response rate and shorter duration of response and PFS than the remaining patients (n = 52). Safety was consistent with previous reports. Conclusion: These analyses demonstrate a consistent benefit for melflufen and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who have not received an ASCT or progressed >36 months after receiving an ASCT (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03151811).

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Sonneveld , P , Richardson , P G , Ludwig , H , Dimopoulos , M A , Schjesvold , F H , Hájek , R , Abdulhaq , H , Thuresson , M , Norin , S , Bakker , N A & Mateos , M V 2023 , ' Benefit Versus Risk Assessment of Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma : Analyses From Longer Follow-up of the OCEAN and HORIZON Studies ' , Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia , vol. 23 , no. 9 , pp. 687-696 .
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1398451714
Document Type :
Electronic Resource