Back to Search Start Over

Suicide Prevention Research Priorities: Final Report

Authors :
Reifels, L
Krysinska, K
Andriessen, K
Ftanou, M
Machlin, A
McKay, S
Robinson, J
Pirkis, J
Reifels, L
Krysinska, K
Andriessen, K
Ftanou, M
Machlin, A
McKay, S
Robinson, J
Pirkis, J
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background and aim: Suicide continues to be a major public health challenge in Australia with significant individual, community, and societal impacts. Targeted and timely research efforts are essential to effectively address this challenge in a rapidly changing world. Building on our earlier research priority setting exercise conducted in 2017, the present project aimed to inform future priorities in Australian suicide prevention research and identify shifts in research emphasis over time. Method: We examined current research priorities in Australian suicide prevention research by reviewing grants and fellowships funded and peer-reviewed journal articles published during 2017-2022, which were categorised according to an existing classification framework. We also surveyed key stakeholders with a known interest in suicide prevention research as to where future research emphasis should be placed and categorised their responses according to the same framework. Replicating the methodology from our earlier exercise, enabled us to contrast current and future research priorities and identify any shifts in research emphasis over time. Key findings: Overall research investment and publication output in Australian suicide prevention research has increased significantly in 2017-2022, with 393 journal articles published and 110 grants and fellowships funded to the tune of $45.1m. This represents more than a quadrupling of total research funding over a 5-year period and a 50% increase in annual publication output compared to our earlier exercise conducted over a 7.5-year period in 2010-2017. Recent research funding efforts are starting to manifest key changes in the types of research called for by stakeholders, while the associated evidence base is yet to fully materialise in publications. Notably, intervention studies (43%) emerged as the most frequently funded study type, while epidemiological research continued to dominate in published articles (59%). Mirroring stakeholder ide

Details

Database :
OAIster
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1397533674
Document Type :
Electronic Resource