Back to Search
Start Over
Perioperative nivolumab monotherapy versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma:a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial
- Source :
- Kaseb , A O , Hasanov , E , Cao , H S T , Xiao , L , Vauthey , J N , Lee , S S , Yavuz , B G , Mohamed , Y I , Qayyum , A , Jindal , S , Duan , F , Basu , S , Yadav , S S , Nicholas , C , Sun , J J , Singh Raghav , K P , Rashid , A , Carter , K , Chun , Y S , Tzeng , C W D , Sakamuri , D , Xu , L , Sun , R , Cristini , V , Beretta , L , Yao , J C , Wolff , R A , Allison , J P & Sharma , P 2022 , ' Perioperative nivolumab monotherapy versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma : a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial ' , The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology , vol. 7 , no. 3 , pp. 208-218 .
- Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma has high recurrence rates after surgery; however, there are no approved standard-of-care neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies. Immunotherapy has been shown to improve survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma; we therefore aimed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of perioperative immunotherapy in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: In this single-centre, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial, patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 240 mg of nivolumab intravenously every 2 weeks (for up to three doses before surgery at 6 weeks) followed in the adjuvant phase by 480 mg of nivolumab intravenously every 4 weeks for 2 years, or 240 mg of nivolumab intravenously every 2 weeks (for up to three doses before surgery) plus one dose of 1 mg/kg of ipilimumab intravenously concurrently with the first preoperative dose of nivolumab, followed in the adjuvant phase by 480 mg of nivolumab intravenously every 4 weeks for up to 2 years plus 1 mg/kg of ipilimumab intravenously every 6 weeks for up to four cycles. Patients were randomly assigned to the treatment groups by use of block randomisation with a random block size. The primary endpoint was the safety and tolerability of nivolumab with or without ipilimumab. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with an overall response, time to progression, and progression-free survival. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03222076) and is completed. Findings: Between Oct 30, 2017, and Dec 3, 2019, 30 patients were enrolled and 27 were randomly assigned: 13 to nivolumab and 14 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Grade 3–4 adverse events were higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (six [43%] of 14 patients) than with nivolumab alone (three [23%] of 13). The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade were increased alanine aminotransferase (three [23%] of 13 patients on nivolumab vs seven [50%] of 14 pa
Details
- Database :
- OAIster
- Journal :
- Kaseb , A O , Hasanov , E , Cao , H S T , Xiao , L , Vauthey , J N , Lee , S S , Yavuz , B G , Mohamed , Y I , Qayyum , A , Jindal , S , Duan , F , Basu , S , Yadav , S S , Nicholas , C , Sun , J J , Singh Raghav , K P , Rashid , A , Carter , K , Chun , Y S , Tzeng , C W D , Sakamuri , D , Xu , L , Sun , R , Cristini , V , Beretta , L , Yao , J C , Wolff , R A , Allison , J P & Sharma , P 2022 , ' Perioperative nivolumab monotherapy versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma : a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial ' , The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology , vol. 7 , no. 3 , pp. 208-218 .
- Notes :
- application/pdf, English
- Publication Type :
- Electronic Resource
- Accession number :
- edsoai.on1397306386
- Document Type :
- Electronic Resource