Back to Search Start Over

Does the Type of Adjuvant Radiation Matter When Treating Elderly High-Risk Endometrial Cancer Patients with Chemotherapy and Radiation?

Authors :
OBG
SOM
Sara M. Drayer
Collin Sitler, Chunqiao Tian, Christopher M. Tarney, Yovanni Casablanca, Ann Klopp, Matthew A. Powell, John K. Chan, Nicholas W. Bateman, Thomas P Conrads, G. Larry Maxwell, Neil T. Phippen, Kathleen M. Darcy
OBG
SOM
Sara M. Drayer
Collin Sitler, Chunqiao Tian, Christopher M. Tarney, Yovanni Casablanca, Ann Klopp, Matthew A. Powell, John K. Chan, Nicholas W. Bateman, Thomas P Conrads, G. Larry Maxwell, Neil T. Phippen, Kathleen M. Darcy
Source :
Conference; SGO Winter Meeting; Whistler, BC, Canada; RITM0033329Drayer2023Poster.pdf; Digital collection created by the USUHS Archives, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Does the Type of Adjuvant Radiation Matter When Treating Elderly High-Risk Endometrial Cancer Patients with Chemotherapy and Radiation? Poster ID: 271868 - National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) Study - Hysterectomy-staged patients diagnosed ≥70yrs, between 2004-2017 - High-risk endometrial cancer, defined as: - Stage IB grade 3 or stage II-III any grade EEC - Stage I-III serous/clear cell carcinoma - Adjuvant treatment with CT+VBT vs. CT+EBRT±VBT - Propensity score analysis balanced the prognostic clinical variables that varied by treatment - Survival was estimated using weighted Kaplan-Meier method. - Risk of death was estimated using weighted Cox model RESULTS Sara M. Drayer MD1,2, Collin Sitler DO1,2, Chunqiao Tian PhD1-3, Christopher M. Tarney MD1,2, Yovanni Casablanca MD4, Ann Klopp MD5, Matthew A. Powell MD6, John K. Chan MD7, Nicholas W. Bateman PhD1-3, Thomas P Conrads PhD1,2,8, G. Larry Maxwell MD1,2,8, Neil T. Phippen MD1,2, Kathleen M. Darcy PhD1-3 No. at Risk 0-mo. 12-mo. 24-mo. 36-mo. 48-mo. 60-mo. CT+EBRT±VBT 1984 1872 1537 1191 923 706 CT+VBT 1309 1265 1082 851 663 504 5-Year Survival (95% CI) Adjusted HR (95% CI) P value CT+EBRT±VBT 63.0 (59.9 – 65.9) Reference CT+VBT 67.0 (62.9 – 70.7) 0.80 (0.69 – 0.92) 0.002 BACKGROUND METHODS CONCLUSIONS Incidence and mortality in endometrial cancer are increasing, and survival outcomes are poor for patients with high-risk disease. Standard of care includes surgical staging, followed by adjuvant RT (radiation alone), CT (chemotherapy alone), or CT+RT (chemoradiotherapy). - GOG 99/PORTEC 1: utility of RT in a high-risk population - PORTEC 2: non-inferiority of VBT (vaginal brachytherapy) to EBRT (external beam) - PORTEC 3: survival benefit from CT+RT vs RT (more pronounced in individuals age > 70) - GOG 258: CT+RT equivalent to CT alone - CT+VBT is yet to be evaluated in a randomized trial - Adjuvant CT+VBT was associated with superior overall survival compared to CT+EBRT±VBT in elderly high-risk endometrial cancer pat<br />RITM0033329<br />Incidence and mortality in endometrial cancer are increasing, and survival outcomes are poor for patients with high-risk disease. Standard of care includes surgical staging, followed by adjuvant RT (radiation alone), CT (chemotherapy alone), or CT+RT (chemoradiotherapy). - GOG 99/PORTEC 1: utility of RT in a high-risk population - PORTEC 2: non-inferiority of VBT (vaginal brachytherapy) to EBRT (external beam) - PORTEC 3: survival benefit from CT+RT vs RT (more pronounced in individuals age > 70) - GOG 258: CT+RT equivalent to CT alone - CT+VBT is yet to be evaluated in a randomized trial

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Conference; SGO Winter Meeting; Whistler, BC, Canada; RITM0033329Drayer2023Poster.pdf; Digital collection created by the USUHS Archives, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.
Notes :
pdf University Archives, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland 20814 RITM0033329Drayer2023Poster.pdf
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1395443410
Document Type :
Electronic Resource