Back to Search Start Over

Report on biodiversity and related concepts perceptions. Delivrable number: D1.1

Authors :
Schleiffer, Mirjam
Smith, Barbara
Frick, Rebekka
Bredin, Yennie
Ghezal, Sabir
Udall, Donna
Pataki, György
Cooke, Grania
Singsaas, Frode
Soliev, Ilkhom
Czett, Carmen
Bonetti, Marta
Villa, Matteo
Fitzka, Linda
Loučková, Blanka
Mendes, Vinícius
Home, Robert
Schleiffer, Mirjam
Smith, Barbara
Frick, Rebekka
Bredin, Yennie
Ghezal, Sabir
Udall, Donna
Pataki, György
Cooke, Grania
Singsaas, Frode
Soliev, Ilkhom
Czett, Carmen
Bonetti, Marta
Villa, Matteo
Fitzka, Linda
Loučková, Blanka
Mendes, Vinícius
Home, Robert
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

• This report provides insight into the biodiversity discourse by biodiversityrelevant actor groups in Europe • The absence of a common understanding of biodiversity allows actor groups to choose rhetoric strategically • Biodiversity discourse is used strategically to persuade, gather custom or support, or justify action or inaction • Anthropocentric values are mostly used when arguing both for and against biodiversity conservation • The biodiversity discourse is dominated by rhetoric of warning, persuading, calling for action, accusing, and informing • The rhetoric used in biodiversity discourse differs between countries • Knowledge of societal discourses are valuable to tailor interventions to promote biodiversity, such as those in PLANET4B case studies

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1393083569
Document Type :
Electronic Resource