Back to Search Start Over

A novel proposed grading system for cerebellar arteriovenous malformations.

Authors :
Nisson, Peyton L
Nisson, Peyton L
Fard, Salman A
Walter, Christina M
Johnstone, Cameron M
Mooney, Michael A
Tayebi Meybodi, Ali
Lang, Michael
Kim, Helen
Jahnke, Heidi
Roe, Denise J
Dumont, Travis M
Lemole, G Michael
Spetzler, Robert F
Lawton, Michael T
Nisson, Peyton L
Nisson, Peyton L
Fard, Salman A
Walter, Christina M
Johnstone, Cameron M
Mooney, Michael A
Tayebi Meybodi, Ali
Lang, Michael
Kim, Helen
Jahnke, Heidi
Roe, Denise J
Dumont, Travis M
Lemole, G Michael
Spetzler, Robert F
Lawton, Michael T
Source :
Journal of neurosurgery; vol 132, iss 4, 1105-1115; 0022-3085
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the existing Spetzler-Martin (SM), Spetzler-Ponce (SP), and Lawton-Young (LY) grading systems for cerebellar arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and to propose a new grading system to estimate the risks associated with these lesions.MethodsData for patients with cerebellar AVMs treated microsurgically in two tertiary medical centers were retrospectively reviewed. Data from patients at institution 1 were collected from September 1999 to February 2013, and at institution 2 from October 2008 to October 2015. Patient outcomes were classified as favorable (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-2) or poor (mRS score 3-6) at the time of discharge. Using chi-square and logistic regression analysis, variables associated with poor outcomes were assigned risk points to design the proposed grading system. The proposed system included neurological status prior to treatment (poor, +2 points), emergency surgery (+1 point), age > 60 years (+1 point), and deep venous drainage (deep, +1 point). Risk point totals of 0-1 comprised grade 1, 2-3 grade 2, and 4-5 grade 3.ResultsA total of 125 cerebellar AVMs of 1328 brain AVMs were reviewed in 125 patients, 120 of which were treated microsurgically and included in the study. With our proposed grading system, we found poor outcomes differed significantly between each grade (p < 0.001), while with the SM, SP, and LY grading systems they did not (p = 0.22, p = 0.25, and p = 1, respectively). Logistic regression revealed grade 2 had 3.3 times the risk of experiencing a poor outcome (p = 0.008), while grade 3 had 9.9 times the risk (p < 0.001). The proposed grading system demonstrated a superior level of predictive accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] of 0.72) compared with the SM, SP, and LY grading systems (AUROC of 0.61, 0.57, and 0.51, respectively).ConclusionsThe authors propose a novel grading system for cerebellar AVMs based on emergency surge

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Journal of neurosurgery; vol 132, iss 4, 1105-1115; 0022-3085
Notes :
application/pdf, Journal of neurosurgery vol 132, iss 4, 1105-1115 0022-3085
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1391601679
Document Type :
Electronic Resource