Back to Search Start Over

A novel preoperative risk score to optimize patient selection for performing concomitant liver resection with cytoreductive surgery/HIPEC.

Authors :
Lee, Rachel M
Lee, Rachel M
Gamboa, Adriana C
Turgeon, Michael K
Zaidi, Mohammad Y
Kimbrough, Charles
Leiting, Jennifer
Grotz, Travis
Lee, Andrew J
Fournier, Keith
Powers, Benjamin
Dineen, Sean
Baumgartner, Joel M
Veerapong, Jula
Mogal, Harveshp
Clarke, Callisia
Wilson, Gregory
Patel, Sameer
Hendrix, Ryan
Lambert, Laura
Pokrzywa, Courtney
Abbott, Daniel E
LaRocca, Christopher J
Raoof, Mustafa
Greer, Jonathan
Johnston, Fabian M
Staley, Charles A
Cloyd, Jordan M
Maithel, Shishir K
Russell, Maria C
Lee, Rachel M
Lee, Rachel M
Gamboa, Adriana C
Turgeon, Michael K
Zaidi, Mohammad Y
Kimbrough, Charles
Leiting, Jennifer
Grotz, Travis
Lee, Andrew J
Fournier, Keith
Powers, Benjamin
Dineen, Sean
Baumgartner, Joel M
Veerapong, Jula
Mogal, Harveshp
Clarke, Callisia
Wilson, Gregory
Patel, Sameer
Hendrix, Ryan
Lambert, Laura
Pokrzywa, Courtney
Abbott, Daniel E
LaRocca, Christopher J
Raoof, Mustafa
Greer, Jonathan
Johnston, Fabian M
Staley, Charles A
Cloyd, Jordan M
Maithel, Shishir K
Russell, Maria C
Source :
Journal of surgical oncology; vol 123, iss 1, 187-195; 0022-4790
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

BackgroundWhile parenchymal hepatic metastases were previously considered a contraindication to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), liver resection (LR) is increasingly performed with CRS/HIPEC.MethodsPatients from the US HIPEC Collaborative (2000-2017) with invasive appendiceal or colorectal adenocarcinoma undergoing primary, curative intent CRS/HIPEC with CC0-1 resection were included. LR was defined as a formal parenchymal resection. Primary endpoints were postoperative complications and overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 658 patients were included. About 83 (15%) underwent LR of colorectal (58%) or invasive appendiceal (42%) metastases. LR patients had more complications (81% vs. 60%; p = .001), greater number of complications (2.3 vs. 1.5; p < .001) per patient and required more reoperations (22% vs. 11%; p = .007) and readmissions (39% vs. 25%; p = .014) than non-LR patients. LR patients had decreased OS (2-year OS 62% vs. 79%, p < .001), even when accounting for peritoneal carcinomatosis index and histology type. Preoperative factors associated with decreased OS on multivariable analysis in LR patients included age < 60 years (HR, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.10-11.81), colorectal histology (HR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.69-12.65), and multiple liver tumors (HR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.21-9.85) (all p < .05). When assigning one point for each factor, there was an incremental decrease in 2-year survival as the risk score increased from 0 to 3 (0: 100%; 1: 91%; 2: 58%; 3: 0%).ConclusionsAs CRS/HIPEC + LR has become more common, we created a simple risk score to stratify patients considered for CRS/HIPEC + LR. These data aid in striking the balance between an increased perioperative complication profile with the potential for improvement in OS.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Journal of surgical oncology; vol 123, iss 1, 187-195; 0022-4790
Notes :
application/pdf, Journal of surgical oncology vol 123, iss 1, 187-195 0022-4790
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1391599227
Document Type :
Electronic Resource