Back to Search Start Over

Randomized Clinical Study of Temporary Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Difficult-to-Wean Patients

Authors :
Dres, Martin
de Abreu, Marcelo Gama
Merdji, Hamid
Muller-Redetzky, Holger
Dellweg, Dominic
Randerath, Winfried J.
Mortaza, Satar
Jung, Boris
Bruells, Christian
Moerer, Onnen
Scharffenberg, Martin
Jaber, Samir
Besset, Sebastien
Bitter, Thomas
Geise, Arnim
Heine, Alexander
Malfertheiner, Maximilian, V
Kortgen, Andreas
Benzaquen, Jonathan
Nelson, Teresa
Uhrig, Alexander
Moenig, Olaf
Meziani, Ferhat
Demoule, Alexandre
Similowski, Thomas
Dres, Martin
de Abreu, Marcelo Gama
Merdji, Hamid
Muller-Redetzky, Holger
Dellweg, Dominic
Randerath, Winfried J.
Mortaza, Satar
Jung, Boris
Bruells, Christian
Moerer, Onnen
Scharffenberg, Martin
Jaber, Samir
Besset, Sebastien
Bitter, Thomas
Geise, Arnim
Heine, Alexander
Malfertheiner, Maximilian, V
Kortgen, Andreas
Benzaquen, Jonathan
Nelson, Teresa
Uhrig, Alexander
Moenig, Olaf
Meziani, Ferhat
Demoule, Alexandre
Similowski, Thomas
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Rationale: Diaphragm dysfunction is frequently observed in critically ill patients with difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation. Objectives: To evaluate the effects of temporary transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation on weaning outcome and maximal inspiratory pressure. Methods: Multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled study. Patients aged >= 18 years on invasive mechanical ventilation for >= 4 days and having failed at least two weaning attempts received temporary transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation using a multielectrode stimulating central venous catheter (bilateral phrenic stimulation) and standard of care (treatment) (n = 57) or standard of care (control) (n= 55). In seven patients, the catheter could not be inserted, and in seven others, pacing therapy could not be delivered; consequently, data were available for 43 patients. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients successfully weaned. Other endpoints were mechanical ventilation duration, 30-day survival, maximal inspiratory pressure, diaphragm-thickening fraction, adverse events, and stimulation-related pain. Measurements and Main Results: The incidences of successful weaning were 82% (treatment) and 74% (control) (absolute difference [95% confidence interval (CI)], 7% [-10 to 25]), P = 0.59. Mechanical ventilation duration (mean +/- SD) was 12.7 +/- 9.9 days and 14.1 +/- 10.8 days, respectively, P = 0.50; maximal inspiratory pressure increased by 16.6 cm H2O and 4.8 cm H2O, respectively (difference [95% CI], 11.8 [5 to 19]), P = 0.001; and right hemidiaphragm thickening fraction during unassisted spontaneous breathing was +17% and -14%, respectively, P = 0.006, without correlation with changes in maximal inspiratory pressure. Serious adverse event frequency was similar in both groups. Median stimulation-related pain in the treatment group was 0 (no pain). Conclusions: Temporary transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation did not increase the proportion of successful weaning from mechanic

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1383745511
Document Type :
Electronic Resource