Back to Search Start Over

Perioperative or only adjuvant gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for resectable pancreatic cancer (NEONAX)da randomized phase II trial of the AIO pancreatic cancer group

Authors :
Seufferlein, T.
Uhl, W.
Kornmann, M.
Alguel, H.
Friess, H.
Koenig, A.
Ghadimi, M.
Gallmeier, E.
Bartsch, D. K.
Lutz, M. P.
Metzger, R.
Wille, K.
Gerdes, B.
Schimanski, C. C.
Graupe, F.
Kunzmann, V.
Klein, I.
Geissler, M.
Staib, L.
Waldschmidt, D.
Bruns, C.
Wittel, U.
Fichtner-Feigl, S.
Daum, S.
Hinke, A.
Blome, L.
Tannapfel, A.
Kleger, A.
Berger, A. W.
Kestler, A. M. R.
Schuhbaur, J. S.
Perkhofer, L.
Tempero, M.
Reinacher-Schick, A. C.
Ettrich, T. J.
Seufferlein, T.
Uhl, W.
Kornmann, M.
Alguel, H.
Friess, H.
Koenig, A.
Ghadimi, M.
Gallmeier, E.
Bartsch, D. K.
Lutz, M. P.
Metzger, R.
Wille, K.
Gerdes, B.
Schimanski, C. C.
Graupe, F.
Kunzmann, V.
Klein, I.
Geissler, M.
Staib, L.
Waldschmidt, D.
Bruns, C.
Wittel, U.
Fichtner-Feigl, S.
Daum, S.
Hinke, A.
Blome, L.
Tannapfel, A.
Kleger, A.
Berger, A. W.
Kestler, A. M. R.
Schuhbaur, J. S.
Perkhofer, L.
Tempero, M.
Reinacher-Schick, A. C.
Ettrich, T. J.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Data on perioperative chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (rPDAC) are limited. NEONAX examined perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in rPDAC (National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria).Patients and methods: NEONAX is a prospective, randomized phase II trial with two independent experimental arms. One hundred twenty-seven rPDAC patients in 22 German centers were randomized 1 : 1 to perioperative (two preoperative and four post-operative cycles, arm A) or adjuvant (six cycles, arm B) gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and nabpaclitaxel (125 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle.Results: The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) at 18 months in the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population [R0/R1-resected patients who started neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) (A) or adjuvant CTX (B)]. The predefined DFS rate of 55% at 18 months was not reached in both arms [A: 33.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.5% to 48.1%), B: 41.4% (95% CI 20.7% to 62.0%)]. Ninety percent of patients in arm A completed neoadjuvant treatment, and 42% of patients in arm B started adjuvant chemotherapy. R0 resection rate was 88% (arm A) and 67% (arm B), respectively. Median overall survival (mOS) (ITT population) as a secondary endpoint was 25.5 months (95% CI 19.7-29.7 months) in arm A and 16.7 months (95% CI 11.6-22.2 months) in the upfront surgery arm. This difference corresponds to a median DFS (mDFS) (ITT) of 11.5 months (95% CI 8.8-14.5 months) in arm A and 5.9 months (95% CI 3.6-11.5 months) in arm B. Treatment was safe and well tolerable in both arms.Conclusions: The primary endpoint, DFS rate of 55% at 18 months (mITT population), was not reached in either arm of the trial and numerically favored the upfront surgery arm B. mOS (ITT population), a secondary endpoint, numerically favored the neoadjuvant arm A [25.5 months (95% CI 19.7-29.7months); arm B 16.7 months (95% CI 11.6-22.2 months)]. There was a d

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1383744982
Document Type :
Electronic Resource