Back to Search Start Over

Content validity of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30 for use in cancer

Authors :
Cocks, Kim
Wells, Jane R
Johnson, Colin
Schmidt, Heike
Koller, Michael
Oerlemans, Simone
Velikova, Galina
Pinto, Monica
Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A
Aaronson, Neil K
Exall, Elizabeth
Finbow, Chelsea
Fitzsimmons, Deborah
Grant, Laura
Grønvold, Mogens
Tolley, Chloe
Wheelwright, Sally
Bottomley, Andrew
Cocks, Kim
Wells, Jane R
Johnson, Colin
Schmidt, Heike
Koller, Michael
Oerlemans, Simone
Velikova, Galina
Pinto, Monica
Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A
Aaronson, Neil K
Exall, Elizabeth
Finbow, Chelsea
Fitzsimmons, Deborah
Grant, Laura
Grønvold, Mogens
Tolley, Chloe
Wheelwright, Sally
Bottomley, Andrew
Source :
Cocks , K , Wells , J R , Johnson , C , Schmidt , H , Koller , M , Oerlemans , S , Velikova , G , Pinto , M , Tomaszewski , K A , Aaronson , N K , Exall , E , Finbow , C , Fitzsimmons , D , Grant , L , Grønvold , M , Tolley , C , Wheelwright , S , Bottomley , A & European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group 2022 , ' Content validity of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30 for use in cancer ' , European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) , vol. 178 , pp. 128-138 .
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

AIM: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) is among the most widely used patient-reported outcome measures in cancer research and practice. It was developed prior to guidance that content should be established directly from patients to confirm it measures concepts of interest and is appropriate and comprehensive for the intended population. This study evaluated the content validity of the QLQ-C30 for use with cancer patients.METHODS: Adults undergoing cancer treatment in Europe and the USA participated in open-ended concept elicitation interviews regarding their functional health, symptoms, side-effects and impacts on health-related quality of life. Thematic analysis was conducted, and similarities across cancer types, disease stages and countries or languages were explored.RESULTS: Interviews with 113 patients with cancer (85 European, 28 USA) including breast, lung, prostate, colorectal and other cancers were conducted between 2016 and 2020. Conceptual saturation was achieved. The most frequently reported concepts were included in the QLQ-C30 conceptual framework. QLQ-C30 items were widely understood across language versions and were relevant to patients across cancer types and disease stages. While several new concepts were elicited such as difficulty climbing steps or stairs, weight loss, skin problems and numbness, many were not widely experienced and/or could be considered sub-concepts of existing concepts.CONCLUSIONS: The QLQ-C30 demonstrates good evidence of content validity for the assessment of functional health, symptom burden and health-related quality of life in patients with localised-to-advanced cancer.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Cocks , K , Wells , J R , Johnson , C , Schmidt , H , Koller , M , Oerlemans , S , Velikova , G , Pinto , M , Tomaszewski , K A , Aaronson , N K , Exall , E , Finbow , C , Fitzsimmons , D , Grant , L , Grønvold , M , Tolley , C , Wheelwright , S , Bottomley , A & European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group 2022 , ' Content validity of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30 for use in cancer ' , European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) , vol. 178 , pp. 128-138 .
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1382512818
Document Type :
Electronic Resource