Back to Search Start Over

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin versus Standard Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Authors :
Kantarjian, Hagop M
Kantarjian, Hagop M
DeAngelo, Daniel J
Stelljes, Matthias
Martinelli, Giovanni
Liedtke, Michaela
Stock, Wendy
Gökbuget, Nicola
O'Brien, Susan
Wang, Kongming
Wang, Tao
Paccagnella, M Luisa
Sleight, Barbara
Vandendries, Erik
Advani, Anjali S
Kantarjian, Hagop M
Kantarjian, Hagop M
DeAngelo, Daniel J
Stelljes, Matthias
Martinelli, Giovanni
Liedtke, Michaela
Stock, Wendy
Gökbuget, Nicola
O'Brien, Susan
Wang, Kongming
Wang, Tao
Paccagnella, M Luisa
Sleight, Barbara
Vandendries, Erik
Advani, Anjali S
Source :
The New England journal of medicine; vol 375, iss 8, 740-753; 0028-4793
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

BackgroundThe prognosis for adults with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia is poor. We sought to determine whether inotuzumab ozogamicin, an anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, results in better outcomes in patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia than does standard therapy.MethodsIn this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia to receive either inotuzumab ozogamicin (inotuzumab ozogamicin group) or standard intensive chemotherapy (standard-therapy group). The primary end points were complete remission (including complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery) and overall survival.ResultsOf the 326 patients who underwent randomization, the first 218 (109 in each group) were included in the primary intention-to-treat analysis of complete remission. The rate of complete remission was significantly higher in the inotuzumab ozogamicin group than in the standard-therapy group (80.7% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 72.1 to 87.7] vs. 29.4% [95% CI, 21.0 to 38.8], P<0.001). Among the patients who had complete remission, a higher percentage in the inotuzumab ozogamicin group had results below the threshold for minimal residual disease (0.01% marrow blasts) (78.4% vs. 28.1%, P<0.001); the duration of remission was longer in the inotuzumab ozogamicin group (median, 4.6 months [95% CI, 3.9 to 5.4] vs. 3.1 months [95% CI, 1.4 to 4.9]; hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.96]; P=0.03). In the survival analysis, which included all 326 patients, progression-free survival was significantly longer in the inotuzumab ozogamicin group (median, 5.0 months [95% CI, 3.7 to 5.6] vs. 1.8 months [95% CI, 1.5 to 2.2]; hazard ratio, 0.45 [97.5% CI, 0.34 to 0.61]; P<0.001); the median overall survival was 7.7 months (95% CI, 6.0 to 9.2) versus 6.7 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 8.3), and the hazard ratio was 0.77 (97.5% CI, 0.58 to 1.03) (P=0.04). In the safety population, the most frequ

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
The New England journal of medicine; vol 375, iss 8, 740-753; 0028-4793
Notes :
application/pdf, The New England journal of medicine vol 375, iss 8, 740-753 0028-4793
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1377981759
Document Type :
Electronic Resource