Back to Search Start Over

Genetic Aspects and Molecular Testing in Prostate Cancer: A Report from a Dutch Multidisciplinary Consensus Meeting

Authors :
Mehra, N.
Kloots, I.
Vlaming, M.
Aluwini, S.
Dewulf, E.
Oprea-Lager, D.E.
Poel, H. van der
Stoevelaar, H.
Yakar, D.
Bangma, Chris H.
Bekers, E.
Bergh, Roderick van den
Bergman, A.M.
Berkmortel, F. van den
Boudewijns, S
Dinjens, W.N.
Futterer, J.J.
Hulle, T. van der
Jenster, G.
Kroeze, L.
Kruchten, M. van
Leenders, G. van
Leeuwen, P.J. van
Leng, W.W.J. de
Moorselaar, R.J.A. van
Noordzij, W.
Oldenburg, R.A.
Oort, I.M. van
Oving, I.
Schalken, J.A.
Schoots, I.G.
Schuuring, E.
Smeenk, R.J.
Vanneste, B.G.L.
Vegt, E
Vis, Andre N.
Vries, K. de
Willemse, P.M.
Wondergem, M.
Ausems, M.
Mehra, N.
Kloots, I.
Vlaming, M.
Aluwini, S.
Dewulf, E.
Oprea-Lager, D.E.
Poel, H. van der
Stoevelaar, H.
Yakar, D.
Bangma, Chris H.
Bekers, E.
Bergh, Roderick van den
Bergman, A.M.
Berkmortel, F. van den
Boudewijns, S
Dinjens, W.N.
Futterer, J.J.
Hulle, T. van der
Jenster, G.
Kroeze, L.
Kruchten, M. van
Leenders, G. van
Leeuwen, P.J. van
Leng, W.W.J. de
Moorselaar, R.J.A. van
Noordzij, W.
Oldenburg, R.A.
Oort, I.M. van
Oving, I.
Schalken, J.A.
Schoots, I.G.
Schuuring, E.
Smeenk, R.J.
Vanneste, B.G.L.
Vegt, E
Vis, Andre N.
Vries, K. de
Willemse, P.M.
Wondergem, M.
Ausems, M.
Source :
European Urology Open Science; 23; 31; 2666-1691; 49; ~European Urology Open Science~23~31~~~2666-1691~~49~~
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Item does not contain fulltext<br />BACKGROUND: Germline and tumour genetic testing in prostate cancer (PCa) is becoming more broadly accepted, but testing indications and clinical consequences for carriers in each disease stage are not yet well defined. OBJECTIVE: To determine the consensus of a Dutch multidisciplinary expert panel on the indication and application of germline and tumour genetic testing in PCa. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The panel consisted of 39 specialists involved in PCa management. We used a modified Delphi method consisting of two voting rounds and a virtual consensus meeting. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Consensus was reached if ≥75% of the panellists chose the same option. Appropriateness was assessed by the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the multiple-choice questions, 44% reached consensus. For men without PCa having a relevant family history (familial PCa/BRCA-related hereditary cancer), follow-up by prostate-specific antigen was considered appropriate. For patients with low-risk localised PCa and a family history of PCa, active surveillance was considered appropriate, except in case of the patient being a BRCA2 germline pathogenic variant carrier. Germline and tumour genetic testing should not be done for nonmetastatic hormone-sensitive PCa in the absence of a relevant family history of cancer. Tumour genetic testing was deemed most appropriate for the identification of actionable variants, with uncertainty for germline testing. For tumour genetic testing in metastatic castration-resistant PCa, consensus was not reached for the timing and panel composition. The principal limitations are as follows: (1) a number of topics discussed lack scientific evidence, and therefore the recommendations are partly opinion based, and (2) there was a small number of experts per discipline. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of this Dutch consensus meeting may provide further guidance on genetic counselling and molecular testing related to PCa.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
European Urology Open Science; 23; 31; 2666-1691; 49; ~European Urology Open Science~23~31~~~2666-1691~~49~~
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1377034992
Document Type :
Electronic Resource