Back to Search Start Over

Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting

Authors :
Tomaniak, Mariusz
Neleman, Tara
des Plantes, Anniek Ziedses
Masdjedi, Kaneshka
van Zandvoort, Laurens J.C.
Kochman, Janusz
Den Dekker, Wijnand K.
Wilschut, Jeroen M.
Diletti, Roberto
Kardys, Isabella
Zijlstra, Felix
Van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
Daemen, Joost
Tomaniak, Mariusz
Neleman, Tara
des Plantes, Anniek Ziedses
Masdjedi, Kaneshka
van Zandvoort, Laurens J.C.
Kochman, Janusz
Den Dekker, Wijnand K.
Wilschut, Jeroen M.
Diletti, Roberto
Kardys, Isabella
Zijlstra, Felix
Van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
Daemen, Joost
Source :
Tomaniak , M , Neleman , T , des Plantes , A Z , Masdjedi , K , van Zandvoort , L J C , Kochman , J , Den Dekker , W K , Wilschut , J M , Diletti , R , Kardys , I , Zijlstra , F , Van Mieghem , N M & Daemen , J 2022 , ' Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting ' , Journal of Clinical Medicine , vol. 11 , no. 5 , 1397 .
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

3D coronary angiography-based vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) proved to be an accurate diagnostic alternative to invasively measured pressure wire based fractional flow reserve (FFR). The ability to compute post-PCI vFFR using pre-PCI vFFR virtual stent analysis is unknown. We aimed to assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of pre-PCI vFFR virtual stenting analysis (residual vFFR) with post-PCI FFR as a reference. This is an observational, single-center retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients from the FFR-SEARCH registry. We blindly calculated residual vFFR from pre-PCI angiograms and compared them to invasive pressure-wire based post-PCI FFR. Inclusion criteria involved presentation with either stable or unstable angina or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), ≥1 significant stenosis in one of the epicardial coronary arteries (percentage diameter stenosis of >70% by QCA or hemodynamically relevant stenosis with FFR ≤0.80) and pre procedural angiograms eligible for vFFR analysis. Exclusion criteria comprised patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), coronary bypass grafts, cardiogenic shock or severe hemodynamic instability. Eighty-one pre-PCI residual vFFR measurements were compared to post-PCI FFR and post-PCI vFFR measurements. Mean residual vFFR was 0.91 ± 0.06, mean post-PCI FFR 0.91 ± 0.06 and mean post-PCI vFFR was 0.92 ± 0.05. Residual vFFR showed a high linear correlation (r = 0.84) and good agreement (mean difference (95% confidence interval): 0.005 (−0.002–0.012)) with post-PCI FFR, as well as with post-PCI-vFFR (r = 0.77, mean difference −0.007 (−0.015–0.0003)). Residual vFFR showed good accuracy in the identification of lesions with post-PCI FFR < 0.90 (sensitivity 94%, specificity 71%, area under the curve (AUC) 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86–0.99), p < 0.001). Virtual stenting using vFFR provided an accurate estimation of post-PCI FFR and post-PCI vFFR. Further studies are needed to prospectiv

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Tomaniak , M , Neleman , T , des Plantes , A Z , Masdjedi , K , van Zandvoort , L J C , Kochman , J , Den Dekker , W K , Wilschut , J M , Diletti , R , Kardys , I , Zijlstra , F , Van Mieghem , N M & Daemen , J 2022 , ' Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting ' , Journal of Clinical Medicine , vol. 11 , no. 5 , 1397 .
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1376785295
Document Type :
Electronic Resource