Back to Search Start Over

Adaption of the Quality From the Patient’s Perspective Instrument for Use in Assessing Gynecological Cancer Care and Patients’ Perceptions of Quality Care Received

Authors :
Olsson, Cecilia
Wilde Larsson, Bodil
Larsson, Maria
Holmberg, Erik
Marcickiewicz, Janusz
Tholander, Bengt
Flöter-Rådestad, Angelique
Bjurberg, Maria
Dahm-Kähler, Pernilla
Hellman, Kristina
Kjölhede, Preben
Stålberg, Karin
Högberg, Thomas
Åvall-Lundqvist, Elisabeth
Borgfeldt, Christer
Olsson, Cecilia
Wilde Larsson, Bodil
Larsson, Maria
Holmberg, Erik
Marcickiewicz, Janusz
Tholander, Bengt
Flöter-Rådestad, Angelique
Bjurberg, Maria
Dahm-Kähler, Pernilla
Hellman, Kristina
Kjölhede, Preben
Stålberg, Karin
Högberg, Thomas
Åvall-Lundqvist, Elisabeth
Borgfeldt, Christer
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Research focusing on patients’ perceptions of the quality of gynecological cancer care is needed. Objective: To adapt the Quality from the Patient’s Perspective instrument for use in gynecological cancer care (QPP-GynCa) and describe patients’ perceptions of their quality of care in terms of the care received and the subjective importance of the aspects of care. Methods: A cross-sectional study 6–8 months after diagnosis was conducted, involving 1511 patients (response rate of 50.4%) included in the Swedish quality registry for gynecologic cancer. Results: The exploratory factor analysis (n = 1431) resulted in the QPP-GynCa with a 5-factor structure and an eigenvalue of ≥1, explaining 73.1% of the total scale variance. The final 27-item version of the QPP-GynCa consisted of 18 items with 8 additional single items and 1 global single item. The Cronbach’s alpha was acceptable for most factors (>.80). Subjective importance scores were higher than corresponding quality of care scores for care received (P ≤ .01)in all dimensions, factors, and items. Conclusions: The QPP-GynCa instrument reflects all 4 dimensions of the theoretical model of quality of care and achieved good validity as a reliable instrument in assessing the quality of gynecological cancer care. Implication for Practice: Information related to self-care, aspects of sexuality, and reducing patient waiting times need improvement. What Is Foundational: This study contributes to a better understanding of quality of gynecological cancer treatment and care. The validated QPP-GynCa instrument will be a platform for more research on how this group of patients experience their received care, as well as importance of each aspect of care.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1374234149
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097.cr9.0000000000000019