Back to Search Start Over

Amplifying patient voices amid pandemic: Perspectives on tracheostomy care, communication, and connection.

Authors :
Pandian, V
Hopkins, BS
Yang, CJ
Ward, E
Sperry, ED
Khalil, O
Gregson, P
Bonakdar, L
Messer, J
Messer, S
Chessels, G
Bosworth, B
Randall, DM
Freeman-Sanderson, A
McGrath, BA
Brenner, MJ
Pandian, V
Hopkins, BS
Yang, CJ
Ward, E
Sperry, ED
Khalil, O
Gregson, P
Bonakdar, L
Messer, J
Messer, S
Chessels, G
Bosworth, B
Randall, DM
Freeman-Sanderson, A
McGrath, BA
Brenner, MJ
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate perspectives of patients, family members, caregivers (PFC), and healthcare professionals (HCP) on tracheostomy care during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The cross-sectional survey investigating barriers and facilitators to tracheostomy care was collaboratively developed by patients, family members, nurses, speech-language pathologists, respiratory care practitioners, physicians, and surgeons. The survey was distributed to the Global Tracheostomy Collaborative's learning community, and responses were analyzed. RESULTS: Survey respondents (n = 191) from 17 countries included individuals with a tracheostomy (85 [45 %]), families/caregivers (43 [22 %]), and diverse HCP (63 [33.0 %]). Overall, 94 % of respondents reported concern that patients with tracheostomy were at increased risk of critical illness from SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19; 93 % reported fear or anxiety. With respect to prioritization of care, 38 % of PFC versus 16 % of HCP reported concern that patients with tracheostomies might not be valued or prioritized (p = 0.002). Respondents also differed in fear of contracting COVID-19 (69 % PFC vs. 49 % HCP group, p = 0.009); concern for hospitalization (55.5 % PFC vs. 27 % HCP, p < 0.001); access to medical personnel (34 % PFC vs. 14 % HCP, p = 0.005); and concern about canceled appointments (62 % PFC vs. 41 % HCP, p = 0.01). Respondents from both groups reported severe stress and fatigue, sleep deprivation, lack of breaks, and lack of support (70 % PFC vs. 65 % HCP, p = 0.54). Virtual telecare seldom met perceived needs. CONCLUSION: PFC with a tracheostomy perceived most risks more acutely than HCP in this global sample. Broad stakeholder engagement is necessary to achieve creative, patient-driven solutions to maintain connection, communication, and access for patients with a tracheostomy.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1373217261
Document Type :
Electronic Resource