Back to Search Start Over

The Gene Curation Coalition: A global effort to harmonize gene-disease evidence resources.

Authors :
DiStefano, MT
Goehringer, S
Babb, L
Alkuraya, FS
Amberger, J
Amin, M
Austin-Tse, C
Balzotti, M
Berg, JS
Birney, E
Bocchini, C
Bruford, EA
Coffey, AJ
Collins, H
Cunningham, F
Daugherty, LC
Einhorn, Y
Firth, HV
Fitzpatrick, DR
Foulger, RE
Goldstein, J
Hamosh, A
Hurles, MR
Leigh, SE
Leong, IUS
Maddirevula, S
Martin, CL
McDonagh, EM
Olry, A
Puzriakova, A
Radtke, K
Ramos, EM
Rath, A
Riggs, ER
Roberts, AM
Rodwell, C
Snow, C
Stark, Z
Tahiliani, J
Tweedie, S
Ware, JS
Weller, P
Williams, E
Wright, CF
Yates, TM
Rehm, HL
DiStefano, MT
Goehringer, S
Babb, L
Alkuraya, FS
Amberger, J
Amin, M
Austin-Tse, C
Balzotti, M
Berg, JS
Birney, E
Bocchini, C
Bruford, EA
Coffey, AJ
Collins, H
Cunningham, F
Daugherty, LC
Einhorn, Y
Firth, HV
Fitzpatrick, DR
Foulger, RE
Goldstein, J
Hamosh, A
Hurles, MR
Leigh, SE
Leong, IUS
Maddirevula, S
Martin, CL
McDonagh, EM
Olry, A
Puzriakova, A
Radtke, K
Ramos, EM
Rath, A
Riggs, ER
Roberts, AM
Rodwell, C
Snow, C
Stark, Z
Tahiliani, J
Tweedie, S
Ware, JS
Weller, P
Williams, E
Wright, CF
Yates, TM
Rehm, HL
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

PURPOSE: Several groups and resources provide information that pertains to the validity of gene-disease relationships used in genomic medicine and research; however, universal standards and terminologies to define the evidence base for the role of a gene in disease and a single harmonized resource were lacking. To tackle this issue, the Gene Curation Coalition (GenCC) was formed. METHODS: The GenCC drafted harmonized definitions for differing levels of gene-disease validity on the basis of existing resources, and performed a modified Delphi survey with 3 rounds to narrow the list of terms. The GenCC also developed a unified database to display curated gene-disease validity assertions from its members. RESULTS: On the basis of 241 survey responses from the genetics community, a consensus term set was chosen for grading gene-disease validity and database submissions. As of December 2021, the database contained 15,241 gene-disease assertions on 4569 unique genes from 12 submitters. When comparing submissions to the database from distinct sources, conflicts in assertions of gene-disease validity ranged from 5.3% to 13.4%. CONCLUSION: Terminology standardization, sharing of gene-disease validity classifications, and resolution of curation conflicts will facilitate collaborations across international curation efforts and in turn, improve consistency in genetic testing and variant interpretation.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1373007575
Document Type :
Electronic Resource