Back to Search Start Over

Expert quality control of solar radiation ground data sets

Authors :
Forstinger, Anne
Wilbert, Stefan
Jensen, Adam R.
Kraas, Birk
Peruchena, Carlos Fernández
Gueymard, Chris A.
Ronzio, Dario
Yang, Dazhi
Collino, Elena
Martinez, Jesús Polo
Ruiz-Arias, Jose A.
Hanrieder, Natalie
Blanc, Philippe
Saint-Drenan, Yves Marie
Forstinger, Anne
Wilbert, Stefan
Jensen, Adam R.
Kraas, Birk
Peruchena, Carlos Fernández
Gueymard, Chris A.
Ronzio, Dario
Yang, Dazhi
Collino, Elena
Martinez, Jesús Polo
Ruiz-Arias, Jose A.
Hanrieder, Natalie
Blanc, Philippe
Saint-Drenan, Yves Marie
Source :
Forstinger , A , Wilbert , S , Jensen , A R , Kraas , B , Peruchena , C F , Gueymard , C A , Ronzio , D , Yang , D , Collino , E , Martinez , J P , Ruiz-Arias , J A , Hanrieder , N , Blanc , P & Saint-Drenan , Y M 2021 , Expert quality control of solar radiation ground data sets . in Proceedings of SWC 2021: ISES Solar World Congress . International Solar Energy Society , pp. 1037-1048 , SWC 2021: ISES Solar World Congress , 25/10/2021 .
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Ground-based radiation measurements are required for all large solar projects and for evaluating the accuracy of solar radiation models and datasets. Ground data almost always contain low-quality periods caused by instrumental issues, logging errors, or maintenance deficiencies. Therefore, quality control (QC) is needed to detect and eventually flag or exclude such suspicious or erroneous data before any subsequent analysis. The few existing automatic QC methods are not perfect, thus expert visual inspection of the data is still required. In this work, we present a harmonized QC procedure, which is a combination of various available methods, including some that include an expert visual inspection. In the framework of IEA PVPS Task 16, these tests are applied to 161 world stations that are equipped with various radiometer models, and are candidates for an ongoing benchmark of irradiance datasets derived from satellite or weather models. Because the implementation of these methods by experts, and their subsequent decisions, might lead to different QC results, the independently obtained results from nine evaluators are compared for two test sites. The QC results are found similar and more stringent than purely automated tests, even though some deviations exist due to differences in manual flagging.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Forstinger , A , Wilbert , S , Jensen , A R , Kraas , B , Peruchena , C F , Gueymard , C A , Ronzio , D , Yang , D , Collino , E , Martinez , J P , Ruiz-Arias , J A , Hanrieder , N , Blanc , P & Saint-Drenan , Y M 2021 , Expert quality control of solar radiation ground data sets . in Proceedings of SWC 2021: ISES Solar World Congress . International Solar Energy Society , pp. 1037-1048 , SWC 2021: ISES Solar World Congress , 25/10/2021 .
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1372616478
Document Type :
Electronic Resource