Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy of a patient decision aid for improving person-centered decision-making by older adults with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors :
Fung, Constance H
Fung, Constance H
Martin, Jennifer L
Liang, Li-Jung
Hays, Ron D
Col, Nananda
Patterson, Emily S
Josephson, Karen
Mitchell, Michael N
Sanchez, Maria C
Aysola, Ravi
Song, Yeonsu
Dzierzewski, Joseph M
Huang, David
Zeidler, Michelle
Alessi, Cathy
Fung, Constance H
Fung, Constance H
Martin, Jennifer L
Liang, Li-Jung
Hays, Ron D
Col, Nananda
Patterson, Emily S
Josephson, Karen
Mitchell, Michael N
Sanchez, Maria C
Aysola, Ravi
Song, Yeonsu
Dzierzewski, Joseph M
Huang, David
Zeidler, Michelle
Alessi, Cathy
Source :
Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine; vol 17, iss 2, 121-128; 1550-9389
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Study objectivesPerson-centered obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) care is a collaborative approach that is respectful of an individual's health priorities. Informed decision-making is essential to person-centered care, especially as patients age. In a feasibility study, we evaluated the effects of a new decision aid (Decide2Rest) on OSA treatment decision-making in older adults.MethodsPatients (aged ≥ 60 years) with newly diagnosed OSA were recruited from two health care systems and randomized either to Decide2Rest or to a control program. Postintervention outcomes included 1) Decisional Conflict Scale (0-100, where 0 = low and 100 = high conflict), which measures perceptions of uncertainty, whether decisions reflect what matters most to patients, and whether patients feel supported in decision-making; 2) Preparation for Decision-Making scale (0-100, where 0 = least and 100 most prepared); and 3) OSA knowledge (0-100, where 0 = poor and 100 = outstanding). Multivariable linear regression models examined relationships between Decide2Rest and outcomes (Decisional Conflict Scale, Preparation for Decision-Making, OSA knowledge).ResultsSeventy-three patients were randomized to Decide2Rest (n = 36; mean age, 69 years; 72% male) vs control (n = 37; mean age, 69 years; 70% male). Results from the regressions, controlling for study site, indicate that the Decide2Rest program resulted in less decisional conflict (20.5 vs 32.7 on the Decisional Conflict Scale; P = .014), more preparedness for decision-making (87.8 vs 66.2 on the Preparation for Decision-Making scale; P < .001), and greater OSA knowledge (75.1 vs 65.3 OSA knowledge score; P = .04) scores than in the control group.ConclusionsThe Decide2Rest program promotes person-centered OSA decision-making for older patients with newly diagnosed OSA. Future studies are needed to optimize implementation of the program.Clinical trial registrationRegistry: ClinicalTrials.gov, Name: Improving Older Adults' Decision-Making for OSAT

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine; vol 17, iss 2, 121-128; 1550-9389
Notes :
application/pdf, Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine vol 17, iss 2, 121-128 1550-9389
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1367467222
Document Type :
Electronic Resource