Back to Search Start Over

Hypofractionated FLASH-RT as an Effective Treatment against Glioblastoma that Reduces Neurocognitive Side Effects in Mice.

Authors :
Montay-Gruel, Pierre
Montay-Gruel, Pierre
Acharya, Munjal M
Gonçalves Jorge, Patrik
Petit, Benoît
Petridis, Ioannis G
Fuchs, Philippe
Leavitt, Ron
Petersson, Kristoffer
Gondré, Maude
Ollivier, Jonathan
Moeckli, Raphael
Bochud, François
Bailat, Claude
Bourhis, Jean
Germond, Jean-François
Limoli, Charles L
Vozenin, Marie-Catherine
Montay-Gruel, Pierre
Montay-Gruel, Pierre
Acharya, Munjal M
Gonçalves Jorge, Patrik
Petit, Benoît
Petridis, Ioannis G
Fuchs, Philippe
Leavitt, Ron
Petersson, Kristoffer
Gondré, Maude
Ollivier, Jonathan
Moeckli, Raphael
Bochud, François
Bailat, Claude
Bourhis, Jean
Germond, Jean-François
Limoli, Charles L
Vozenin, Marie-Catherine
Source :
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research; vol 27, iss 3, 775-784; 1078-0432
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

PurposeRecent data have shown that single-fraction irradiation delivered to the whole brain in less than tenths of a second using FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT), does not elicit neurocognitive deficits in mice. This observation has important clinical implications for the management of invasive and treatment-resistant brain tumors that involves relatively large irradiation volumes with high cytotoxic doses.Experimental designTherefore, we aimed at simultaneously investigating the antitumor efficacy and neuroprotective benefits of FLASH-RT 1-month after exposure, using a well-characterized murine orthotopic glioblastoma model. As fractionated regimens of radiotherapy are the standard of care for glioblastoma treatment, we incorporated dose fractionation to simultaneously validate the neuroprotective effects and optimized tumor treatments with FLASH-RT.ResultsThe capability of FLASH-RT to minimize the induction of radiation-induced brain toxicities has been attributed to the reduction of reactive oxygen species, casting some concern that this might translate to a possible loss of antitumor efficacy. Our study shows that FLASH and CONV-RT are isoefficient in delaying glioblastoma growth for all tested regimens. Furthermore, only FLASH-RT was found to significantly spare radiation-induced cognitive deficits in learning and memory in tumor-bearing animals after the delivery of large neurotoxic single dose or hypofractionated regimens.ConclusionsThe present results show that FLASH-RT delivered with hypofractionated regimens is able to spare the normal brain from radiation-induced toxicities without compromising tumor cure. This exciting capability provides an initial framework for future clinical applications of FLASH-RT.See related commentary by Huang and Mendonca, p. 662.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research; vol 27, iss 3, 775-784; 1078-0432
Notes :
application/pdf, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research vol 27, iss 3, 775-784 1078-0432
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1367465866
Document Type :
Electronic Resource