Back to Search Start Over

Routine asymptomatic testing strategies for airline travel during the COVID-19 pandemic: a simulation study.

Authors :
Kiang, Mathew V
Kiang, Mathew V
Chin, Elizabeth T
Huynh, Benjamin Q
Chapman, Lloyd AC
Rodríguez-Barraquer, Isabel
Greenhouse, Bryan
Rutherford, George W
Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten
Havlir, Diane
Basu, Sanjay
Lo, Nathan C
Kiang, Mathew V
Kiang, Mathew V
Chin, Elizabeth T
Huynh, Benjamin Q
Chapman, Lloyd AC
Rodríguez-Barraquer, Isabel
Greenhouse, Bryan
Rutherford, George W
Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten
Havlir, Diane
Basu, Sanjay
Lo, Nathan C
Source :
The Lancet. Infectious diseases; vol 21, iss 7, 929-938; 1473-3099
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

BackgroundRoutine viral testing strategies for SARS-CoV-2 infection might facilitate safe airline travel during the COVID-19 pandemic and mitigate global spread of the virus. However, the effectiveness of these test-and-travel strategies to reduce passenger risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and population-level transmission remains unknown.MethodsIn this simulation study, we developed a microsimulation of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in a cohort of 100 000 US domestic airline travellers using publicly available data on COVID-19 clinical cases and published natural history parameters to assign individuals one of five health states of susceptible to infection, latent period, early infection, late infection, or recovered. We estimated a per-day risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 corresponding to a daily incidence of 150 infections per 100 000 people. We assessed five testing strategies: (1) anterior nasal PCR test within 3 days of departure, (2) PCR within 3 days of departure and 5 days after arrival, (3) rapid antigen test on the day of travel (assuming 90% of the sensitivity of PCR during active infection), (4) rapid antigen test on the day of travel and PCR test 5 days after arrival, and (5) PCR test 5 days after arrival. Strategies 2 and 4 included a 5-day quarantine after arrival. The travel period was defined as 3 days before travel to 2 weeks after travel. Under each scenario, individuals who tested positive before travel were not permitted to travel. The primary study outcome was cumulative number of infectious days in the cohort over the travel period without isolation or quarantine (population-level transmission risk), and the key secondary outcome was the number of infectious people detected on the day of travel (passenger risk of infection).FindingsWe estimated that in a cohort of 100 000 airline travellers, in a scenario with no testing or screening, there would be 8357 (95% uncertainty interval 6144-12831) infectious days with 649 (505-950) actively infectious passe

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
The Lancet. Infectious diseases; vol 21, iss 7, 929-938; 1473-3099
Notes :
application/pdf, The Lancet. Infectious diseases vol 21, iss 7, 929-938 1473-3099
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1367395123
Document Type :
Electronic Resource