Back to Search Start Over

The 'sex gap' in COVID-19 trials: a scoping review

Authors :
Schiffer, V.
Janssen, E.B.N.J.
Bussel, B.C.T. van
Jorissen, L.L.M.
Tas, J.
Sels, J.E.M.
Bergmans, D.
Dinh, T.H.T.
Kuijk, S.M.J. Van
Hana, A.
Mehagnoul-Schipper, J.
Scheeren, C.I.E.
Mesotten, D.
Stessel, B.
Marx, G.
Hof, A. van't
Spaanderman, M.E.A.
Mook, W. van
Horst, I.C. van der
Ghossein-Doha, C.
Schiffer, V.
Janssen, E.B.N.J.
Bussel, B.C.T. van
Jorissen, L.L.M.
Tas, J.
Sels, J.E.M.
Bergmans, D.
Dinh, T.H.T.
Kuijk, S.M.J. Van
Hana, A.
Mehagnoul-Schipper, J.
Scheeren, C.I.E.
Mesotten, D.
Stessel, B.
Marx, G.
Hof, A. van't
Spaanderman, M.E.A.
Mook, W. van
Horst, I.C. van der
Ghossein-Doha, C.
Source :
EclinicalMedicine; 2589-5370; 29; 100652; ~EclinicalMedicine~~~~~2589-5370~~29~~100652
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 229328.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)<br />BACKGROUND: Many studies investigate the role of pharmacological treatments on disease course in Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Sex disparities in genetics, immunological responses, and hormonal mechanisms may underlie the substantially higher fatality rates reported in male COVID-19 patients. To optimise care for COVID-19 patients, prophylactic and therapeutic studies should include sex-specific design and analyses. Therefore, in this scoping review, we investigated whether studies on pharmacological treatment in COVID-19 were performed based on a priori sex-specific design or post-hoc sex-specific analyses. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, UpToDate, clinical trial.org, and MedRxiv for studies on pharmacological treatment for COVID-19 until June 6th, 2020. We included case series, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies in humans (≥18 years) investigating antiviral, antimalarial, and immune system modulating drugs. Data were collected on 1) the proportion of included females, 2) whether sex stratification was performed (a priori by design or post-hoc), and 3) whether effect modification by sex was investigated. FINDINGS: 30 studies were eligible for inclusion, investigating remdesivir (n = 2), lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 5), favipiravir (n = 1), umifenovir (n = 1), hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine (n = 8), convalescent plasma (n = 6), interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway inhibitors (n = 5), interleukin-1 (IL-1) pathway inhibitors (n = 1) and corticosteroids (n = 3). Only one study stratified its data based on sex in a post-hoc analysis, whereas none did a priori by design. None of the studies investigated effect modification by sex. A quarter of the studies included twice as many males as females. INTERPRETATION: Analyses assessing potential interference of sex with (side-)effects of pharmacological therapy for COVID-19 are rarely reported. Considering sex differences in case-fatality rates and genetic, immunological, and hormonal mecha

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
EclinicalMedicine; 2589-5370; 29; 100652; ~EclinicalMedicine~~~~~2589-5370~~29~~100652
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1366924781
Document Type :
Electronic Resource