Back to Search Start Over

Combined Assessment of FFR and CFR for Decision Making in Coronary Revascularization: From the Multicenter International ILIAS Registry

Authors :
Hoef, T.P. van de
Lee, J.M.
Boerhout, C.K.M.
Waard, G.A. de
Jung, J.H.
Lee, S.Hong
Mejía-Rentería, H.
Hoshino, M.
Echavarria-Pinto, M.
Meuwissen, M.
Matsuo, H.
Madera-Cambero, M.
Eftekhari, A.
Effat, M.A.
Murai, T.
Marques, K.
Doh, J.H.
Christiansen, E.H.
Banerjee, R.
Nam, C.W.
Niccoli, G.
Nakayama, M.
Tanaka, N.
Shin, E.S.
Royen, N. van
Chamuleau, S.A.
Knaapen, P.
Escaned, J.
Kakuta, T.
Koo, B.K.
Piek, J.J.
Hoef, T.P. van de
Lee, J.M.
Boerhout, C.K.M.
Waard, G.A. de
Jung, J.H.
Lee, S.Hong
Mejía-Rentería, H.
Hoshino, M.
Echavarria-Pinto, M.
Meuwissen, M.
Matsuo, H.
Madera-Cambero, M.
Eftekhari, A.
Effat, M.A.
Murai, T.
Marques, K.
Doh, J.H.
Christiansen, E.H.
Banerjee, R.
Nam, C.W.
Niccoli, G.
Nakayama, M.
Tanaka, N.
Shin, E.S.
Royen, N. van
Chamuleau, S.A.
Knaapen, P.
Escaned, J.
Kakuta, T.
Koo, B.K.
Piek, J.J.
Source :
JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions; 1047; 1056; 1936-8798; 10; 15; ~JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions~1047~1056~~~1936-8798~10~15~~
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Item does not contain fulltext<br />OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the clinical implications of combined assessment of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR). BACKGROUND: Combined assessment of FFR and CFR allows detailed characterization of pathophysiology in chronic coronary syndromes. Data on the clinical implications of distinct FFR and CFR patterns are limited, leading to uncertainty regarding their relevance. METHODS: Patients with chronic coronary syndromes and obstructive coronary artery disease were selected from the multicenter ILIAS (Inclusive Invasive Physiological Assessment in Angina Syndromes) registry. Patients were classified into 4 groups on the basis of FFR ≤0.80 and CFR <2.0. The endpoint was the 5-year target vessel failure (TVF) rate. RESULTS: A total of 2,143 patients with 2,725 lesions were included. Compared with normal FFR/normal CFR, low FFR/low CFR carried the highest risk for TVF (HR: 5.4; 95% CI: 3.2-9.3; P < 0.001), significantly higher than in revascularized vessels (P = 0.007). Discordance, with either low FFR/normal CFR or normal FFR/low CFR, was associated with increased TVF rates compared with normal FFR/normal CFR (low FFR/normal CFR: HR: 3.5 [95% CI: 2.2-5.4; P < 0.001]; normal FFR/low CFR: HR: 3.0 [95% CI: 1.9-4.7; P < 0.001]). No difference in 5-year TVF was observed between the 2 discordant groups (P = 0.57) or between the discordant groups and the revascularized group (P = 0.26 vs low FFR/normal CFR; P = 0.60 vs normal FFR/low CFR). CONCLUSIONS: Impaired coronary hemodynamics are uniformly associated with increased 5-year TVF rates. Nonrevascularized vessels with discordant FFR and CFR are associated with 5-year event rates that are equivalent to those of vessels that undergo revascularization, whereas vessels with combined low FFR and CFR exhibit event rates that are significantly higher than after revascularization. (Inclusive Invasive Physiological Assessment in Angina Syndromes Registry [ILIAS Registry]; NCT0448

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions; 1047; 1056; 1936-8798; 10; 15; ~JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions~1047~1056~~~1936-8798~10~15~~
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1366909178
Document Type :
Electronic Resource